#musicbrainz

/

      • HairMetalAddict joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15308, 2007

      • sdbrady joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15308, 2007

      • rpedro joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15308, 2007

      • muz joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15308, 2007

      • HiFructose joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15322, 2007

      • YAUB joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15357, 2007

      • Apollozeus joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15356, 2007

      • HairMetalAddict slaps mo with a Uriah Heep with a cover to: Tesla ~ Stealin' [from "Real to Reel: Reel 1" (2007)]
      • 2007-06-02 15321, 2007

      • HairMetalAddict deletes a "with a" from that statement. :-P
      • 2007-06-02 15354, 2007

      • Apollozeus has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15322, 2007

      • UserError has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15342, 2007

      • UserErr0r joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15305, 2007

      • rpedro has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15357, 2007

      • rpedro joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15308, 2007

      • Knio has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15310, 2007

      • Knio1 joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15351, 2007

      • gioele joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15306, 2007

      • gioele
        hi
      • 2007-06-02 15341, 2007

      • Rondom joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15353, 2007

      • Rondom has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15320, 2007

      • inhouseuk has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15328, 2007

      • inhouseuk__ joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15331, 2007

      • inhouseuk__
        inhouseuk__ is now known as inhouseuk
      • 2007-06-02 15353, 2007

      • Chien joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15330, 2007

      • gioele
        is there a command-line tool to tag files using musicbrainz's database?
      • 2007-06-02 15346, 2007

      • FauxFaux
        Perl!
      • 2007-06-02 15300, 2007

      • Citizen
        *g* same thought here
      • 2007-06-02 15310, 2007

      • Citizen
      • 2007-06-02 15336, 2007

      • FauxFaux
        I couldn't work out how to get the silly id3 library (yes, was just working with mp3s at the time) to write TXXX fields, though, which kind of made my life a little difficult.
      • 2007-06-02 15313, 2007

      • UserErr0r has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15336, 2007

      • UserErr0r joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15354, 2007

      • nightgroove
        ooohhh
      • 2007-06-02 15304, 2007

      • nightgroove
        nightgroove is now known as catgroove
      • 2007-06-02 15309, 2007

      • catgroove
        uriah heep cover!
      • 2007-06-02 15356, 2007

      • drsaunde
        it's gonna be a crummy day....i hate going to weddings when there's a smog alert out
      • 2007-06-02 15303, 2007

      • catgroove
        D:
      • 2007-06-02 15346, 2007

      • catgroove
      • 2007-06-02 15349, 2007

      • drsaunde
        mo: I would make that relationship to "Part Two" , then just note the cover is of the "King Kong" section
      • 2007-06-02 15358, 2007

      • catgroove
        I don't like it :(
      • 2007-06-02 15312, 2007

      • catgroove
        i'd rather just make a 'frank zappa composed' type ar
      • 2007-06-02 15318, 2007

      • catgroove
        gah
      • 2007-06-02 15316, 2007

      • drsaunde
        i've done something similar before....can't remember the artist but the original track was a Track A / Track B format and the cover was only of Track A, yet i still made the relationship
      • 2007-06-02 15320, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        morning :)
      • 2007-06-02 15337, 2007

      • BrianFreud has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15316, 2007

      • Chien has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15320, 2007

      • BrianFreud joined the channel
      • 2007-06-02 15336, 2007

      • catgroove
        yes but this is more like 5-10 per 'track'
      • 2007-06-02 15326, 2007

      • drsaunde
        hmm..is there a clear second release (first release as only King Kong)?
      • 2007-06-02 15340, 2007

      • catgroove
        only live afaik
      • 2007-06-02 15342, 2007

      • catgroove
        :(
      • 2007-06-02 15353, 2007

      • drsaunde
        you could link to that version..then link that version as being part of the medley in "Part Two"
      • 2007-06-02 15306, 2007

      • catgroove
        ja.. but only live exsists, afaik
      • 2007-06-02 15309, 2007

      • catgroove
        look the lniks..
      • 2007-06-02 15320, 2007

      • catgroove
      • 2007-06-02 15325, 2007

      • drsaunde
        zappa doesn't like to make things easy does he
      • 2007-06-02 15339, 2007

      • catgroove
        nope
      • 2007-06-02 15357, 2007

      • catgroove
      • 2007-06-02 15352, 2007

      • catgroove
        (yet another non album track removal)
      • 2007-06-02 15300, 2007

      • Knio1
        Knio1 is now known as Knio
      • 2007-06-02 15304, 2007

      • catgroove ponders why hawke voted abstain
      • 2007-06-02 15316, 2007

      • catgroove
        thanks brainfrø and drsound
      • 2007-06-02 15318, 2007

      • catgroove
        :P
      • 2007-06-02 15334, 2007

      • catgroove likes messing peoples nicks
      • 2007-06-02 15313, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        :)
      • 2007-06-02 15331, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        catgroove, did you get my email?
      • 2007-06-02 15306, 2007

      • catgroove
        hmm
      • 2007-06-02 15312, 2007

      • catgroove
        sec, haven't chcked my mails yet
      • 2007-06-02 15321, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        k
      • 2007-06-02 15330, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        dug up some info on the original TW
      • 2007-06-02 15345, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        might need to (ugh) split original TW into 3 groups
      • 2007-06-02 15345, 2007

      • hawke_
        catgroove: hmm, a lot of remixes are attributed to the artists of the original track...
      • 2007-06-02 15301, 2007

      • hawke_
        I voted "abstain" because I'm not sure of the correctness of it
      • 2007-06-02 15308, 2007

      • catgroove
        then the release which it is on shoud have the track artistthance
      • 2007-06-02 15309, 2007

      • catgroove
      • 2007-06-02 15311, 2007

      • catgroove
        this is a NAT
      • 2007-06-02 15319, 2007

      • hawke_
        I guess it comes down to "is it a remix or a cover?"
      • 2007-06-02 15328, 2007

      • hawke_
        the title suggests it's a remix
      • 2007-06-02 15355, 2007

      • catgroove
        I'd say cover sincethats whatthe page I linked to said it was. it was fully re-recorded,
      • 2007-06-02 15305, 2007

      • catgroove
        he got the original singer to guest vocal on it
      • 2007-06-02 15306, 2007

      • catgroove
        :)
      • 2007-06-02 15326, 2007

      • hawke_
        heh
      • 2007-06-02 15336, 2007

      • catgroove
        if it isn't though, the trak does appear on other erleases, so in anycase, a NAT (non album track) is wrong
      • 2007-06-02 15305, 2007

      • hawke_
        yeah, that's true
      • 2007-06-02 15309, 2007

      • gioele has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15359, 2007

      • hawke_
        mo: are you seriously suggesting that a fictitious person is not a valid concept?
      • 2007-06-02 15342, 2007

      • HairMetalAddict has quit
      • 2007-06-02 15313, 2007

      • catgroove
        if its Fitiously fitious, rather than a fittious real entety, ie 'gorillaz' or 'Spinal Tap'
      • 2007-06-02 15323, 2007

      • catgroove
        yes
      • 2007-06-02 15345, 2007

      • catgroove
        there is not fitious real entetty 'the simposns' performing 'as a band'
      • 2007-06-02 15317, 2007

      • catgroove
        it's simply the catch-all released-under-entity for which music for mthat TV show is under
      • 2007-06-02 15350, 2007

      • catgroove
        as people wouldn't know to look for the names of the composers, the recordreleases and oweners of the show don't bother
      • 2007-06-02 15323, 2007

      • catgroove
        people don't know to look of 'richard o'brien' when they look for 'rovky horror picture show' either, but it doesn't make 'rhps' the artist
      • 2007-06-02 15300, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        hawke: Catgroove has a point. He and I talked about this the other day a good bit. Yes, there's precident for ficticious artists. But right now, we're treating TV/Movie characters different than Musicals and some soundtracks.
      • 2007-06-02 15332, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        We don't list "Original London Cast", we list the composer. For most movies, we don't list the characters, we list the composer, classical style.
      • 2007-06-02 15349, 2007

      • catgroove
        we should have AR's with 'roles'
      • 2007-06-02 15349, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        But for The Simpsons, etc, we list the character instead - it's not consistant...
      • 2007-06-02 15307, 2007

      • hawke_
        IMO it should be whoever is credited with it
      • 2007-06-02 15332, 2007

      • catgroove
        yes, but that's not usefull in a daabase like mb
      • 2007-06-02 15338, 2007

      • hawke_
        how is that not useful?
      • 2007-06-02 15344, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        Originally, I would have agreed. But if you think about it a bit, that then means we have "artists" for every single character who ever performs on a soundtrack
      • 2007-06-02 15353, 2007

      • hawke_
        especially with the "performs as" AR
      • 2007-06-02 15353, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        Which becomes unuseful.
      • 2007-06-02 15311, 2007

      • hawke_
        BrianFreud: a lot of times they're not credited to the characters though
      • 2007-06-02 15314, 2007

      • catgroove
        because you get artists like 'bob and Jane' 'Jane and bob' Jane foo & bob bar
      • 2007-06-02 15336, 2007

      • catgroove
        ..among many other issues
      • 2007-06-02 15340, 2007

      • hawke_
        I think that if the album credits the character, put the character; if they credit the real names of the performer, put that; if they credit the writer, put that
      • 2007-06-02 15353, 2007

      • catgroove
        and I think not
      • 2007-06-02 15303, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        hawke: Just using the RHPS example, instead of Richard O'Brien, and being able to look at his works, you would have 10 or more different fictious artists linking back through 2 levels or ARs to the actual performers
      • 2007-06-02 15304, 2007

      • hawke_
        catgroove: the B&J one -- clearly those are all the same artist.
      • 2007-06-02 15324, 2007

      • catgroove
        yes, bad example
      • 2007-06-02 15333, 2007

      • catgroove
        but take BrianFreud example
      • 2007-06-02 15338, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        Plus then you have to handle all the RHPS tracks from various cast recordings, so add in anouther 40 versions of those same ficticious artists
      • 2007-06-02 15341, 2007

      • catgroove
        it would make a MESS out of soundtracks
      • 2007-06-02 15349, 2007

      • hawke_
        RHPS are credited to Richard O'Brien
      • 2007-06-02 15354, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        Right
      • 2007-06-02 15357, 2007

      • catgroove
        not to mention 2006 different 'cast' artists
      • 2007-06-02 15300, 2007

      • hawke_
        I mean on the disc
      • 2007-06-02 15302, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        no
      • 2007-06-02 15314, 2007

      • catgroove
        they aree credited to 'rocky' 'that guy' and 'foobar'
      • 2007-06-02 15315, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        on the disc, it credits "Rocky" "Jane" "Rocky & Jane" etc
      • 2007-06-02 15319, 2007

      • catgroove
        exactly
      • 2007-06-02 15324, 2007

      • hawke_ double-checks
      • 2007-06-02 15333, 2007

      • BrianFreud has the 4 disc set
      • 2007-06-02 15340, 2007

      • catgroove
        and then you'd' have different 'rocky's and different 'janes'
      • 2007-06-02 15352, 2007

      • Clint
        who the fuck is jane?
      • 2007-06-02 15356, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        You have the French, the movie, the Argentine, the San Francisco, the Toronto, the London, etc casts
      • 2007-06-02 15308, 2007

      • catgroove
        for each new cast that records the musical
      • 2007-06-02 15313, 2007

      • catgroove
        yes
      • 2007-06-02 15319, 2007

      • catgroove
        not to mentino all the lanugage tones
      • 2007-06-02 15333, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        (that's the version I mean catgroove :P )
      • 2007-06-02 15350, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        there's a 4 disc set with all the various language casts + movie on it
      • 2007-06-02 15355, 2007

      • catgroove
        eeep
      • 2007-06-02 15303, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        there'd be maybe 4 tracks which credit to the same ficitious artists
      • 2007-06-02 15304, 2007

      • catgroove
        and movies
      • 2007-06-02 15307, 2007

      • catgroove
        'my fair lady' etc
      • 2007-06-02 15316, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        yes
      • 2007-06-02 15320, 2007

      • hawke_
        still, the vast majority of those credit the actors
      • 2007-06-02 15325, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        that's why you convinced me catgroove
      • 2007-06-02 15333, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        every single movie would become a disaster
      • 2007-06-02 15349, 2007

      • catgroove
        yes ,and they shoud have AR's noit be added in fo & bar & jane & tom & dick& rovky 6 meat loaf & guy & etc super artist
      • 2007-06-02 15351, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        So if I wanted every, say David Newman composed film,
      • 2007-06-02 15353, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        no way to find it
      • 2007-06-02 15358, 2007

      • catgroove
        exactly
      • 2007-06-02 15326, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        catgroove: Now, right now, we're talking about artist / albumartist
      • 2007-06-02 15346, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        Would you still be opposed to the fictious artists if created solely for use as "performed by" ARs?
      • 2007-06-02 15352, 2007

      • catgroove
        on a track with everybody i n the cast sinigng , you'd get a track artist like that
      • 2007-06-02 15304, 2007

      • catgroove
        BrianFreud: yes and no
      • 2007-06-02 15337, 2007

      • BrianFreud
        "The Time Warp" by artist Richard O'Brien, performed by Morticia, Morticia a performance name for foobar?
      • 2007-06-02 15355, 2007

      • catgroove
        wait a sec
      • 2007-06-02 15358, 2007

      • catgroove
        I'm coming to that