#musicbrainz

sigh, I ended up editing anyway

and what kind of person thinks it's a good idea to add only the first cd of a 3-disc audiobook

A lazy one.

with three edits to his name, so yeah

or a person who has only one disc

Wizzcat: IIRC CDs started being printed in 1982

http://86.154.78.164:3000/release/7433a0d7-60f8... \o/ it's actually starting to look like a useful branch!

acid2_: \o/

Dammit, mikemorr, I'd completely forgotten about that EVIL page. :)

acid2_: I'm at work as part of work, not this channel mind you :p

I /almost/ looked at the tt code last night, then I remembered the state of postaids' perl set-up. ¬_¬

hmm?

is that my cock up, or yours?

Debian's. Switch to perl 5.10, how dare they.

haha

lol

uhughuhuh

Hahah

oh hai

I should do an svn up on my TT branch, goodness knows what state my copy is in

you should check the log :P

copy, not branch

Yeah, see you've started on release pages

yup, they are looking good now (see link above)

need to load track ARs though

hejsan niklas

hej

Hello, quick question: I have a CD with titles both in English and Greek on the box (that is, song titles are translated in both langs) - should I create a pseudo-release for the English titles?

(artists and lyrics are greek btw)

Yes, if it's english only it's a pseudo release.

Technically all greek is a pseudo release too. The only "official" release is with both as it is on the album.

So I should add a normal release with both titles separated with a hyphen as on the box and create two pseudo releases?

or maybe pseudo realeases are not needed?

Well, ideally yes. But if that's too much work just do what you want.

I always do the official AND pseudo release. But sometimes I'm in a hurry and just do the pseudo release, somebody else can do the official release later.

ok, it's not much work - I just wonder if it might be confusing for people searching for the album

Yeah, that's why I do both (usually). I have all the data there, it will just make things easier for others later down the line.

ok, thanks!

np

oh my

how sexy x_X

it reminds me of old norse, germanic AND english

awesome

the first link is faroese

see the similarities

<3

yay. jim dela hunt is now an automod.

nice. :)

is the promotion to style guru official too?

or will there be a vote or something?

not official.

no voting.

unless you wanna have russion democracy. One candidate. :)

hehe :)

One man, one vote. And we all know who's the man.

what's with brianfreud, btw?

I think life got him

you think but you do not know?

I do know.

he *really* needed a job. and mb was distracting him.

the way he was participating, it really is distracting :D

ya

editing can be as addictive as the greens sometimes

Anyone seen a PPC dmg of Picard with PUID generation working?

er, for that matter, could be universal. i'd just like to see it running on my ppc mac.

not yet. I've asked for volunteers to help package picard, but so far no one has produced anything yet.

VxJasonxV: how about you? any progress?

ruaok: I'm working at hacking away with MacPorts to see if I can get a working build. If I can, I can probably do something to help... I'll need to read up on MacPorts stuff, though.

ok, lemme know if you need help.

do you also have an intel box?

No :/

rats

I know that there's already an Intel DMG which is supposed to work on the blog...

it does work. no reported problems.

but its outdated and so its the build process that created it.

and I tried when I first set up MacPorts here to build everything universal, you know, just so I could pack up things / make a universal binary

but I had lots of problems

oh, don't do that.

so I'm building for PPC only

I've been there too.

thats exactly it.

build twice, then lipo

ok, maybe you can I can be a team then. :)

Ahh, cool. I didn't know what tool did that.

if you can get the build process down and documented for PPC, I can run that on intel.

then I can send you the intel binaries and you can lipo them to create a UB.

I just really want to have a new owner on the osx packaging front. :)

What version should we go for? Latest 0.9 stable or the testing releases?

Yeah, well this is all really new to me. Not building software, but finding my way around macports and such

DMGs and lipo (i had no idea about)

luks: you guys are planning on changing the QT version used?

both 4.3 and 4.4 should be fine

ruaok: I have a really new version of QT 4.4, hope thats not an issue

ah, alrighty

should we prefer one over the other?

nope

great.

that reminds me, I need to check in my osx related changes to setup.py

ruaok: I can send you the package names that I know Picard (or its dependents) need to build.

er, the macports pkg names, at least

sure.

it would be nice to be able to have EVERYTHING in macports.

short of picard itself, but that could come later.

I was thinking about that, too. Reproducibility is key for me, I'd like to test new versions and stuff like that