I don't really like the interface, but it plays flacs and doesn't crash all the time like cog does
2008-01-10 01001, 2008
ruaok
and it supports this crazy thing called MusicBrainz. can't be all bad. :)
2008-01-10 01003, 2008
ruaok
thanks
2008-01-10 01032, 2008
nikki
hehe
2008-01-10 01048, 2008
tro has left the channel
2008-01-10 01040, 2008
aCiD2
huh, bug #3511 is odd
2008-01-10 01058, 2008
ruaok
what's odd about it?
2008-01-10 01020, 2008
aCiD2
Just odd to see that the server crashes on some queries
2008-01-10 01027, 2008
aCiD2
But I don't know much, if anything, about lucene
2008-01-10 01035, 2008
aCiD2
our our search handlers
2008-01-10 01026, 2008
ruaok
I'm guessing that something is getting is query syntax confused.
2008-01-10 01035, 2008
ruaok
*its
2008-01-10 01000, 2008
symphonick has quit
2008-01-10 01034, 2008
brianfreud
A thought I had while on the bus today... rather than some annotations being really long, maybe have multiple annotations per object? "SubOptimalCredits" "History" "Notes for Editors" came to mind
2008-01-10 01024, 2008
aCiD2
how would they be displayed?
2008-01-10 01025, 2008
aCiD2
brb
2008-01-10 01031, 2008
aCiD2 has quit
2008-01-10 01033, 2008
brianfreud
non-js, each subsection as a == ==, one after the other. js-on, little tabs to flip between them
2008-01-10 01052, 2008
aCiD2 joined the channel
2008-01-10 01056, 2008
brianfreud
non-js, each subsection as a == ==, one after the other. js-on, little tabs to flip between them
2008-01-10 01033, 2008
brianfreud
I'm working on the ARs and history between 1877 and 1929 for the cylinder companies - I have a ton of good material, but esp for Columbia, if the whole history were eventually in there, plus editing notes, plus SOC's, plus other stuff, that's a MASSIVE label annotation
2008-01-10 01056, 2008
brianfreud
or look at the current Varese Sarabande annotation, which is rather huge.
2008-01-10 01009, 2008
brianfreud
all good, all useful, but huge
2008-01-10 01015, 2008
aCiD2
Seems cool, could be done all client side too
2008-01-10 01017, 2008
aCiD2
right?
2008-01-10 01036, 2008
brianfreud
how so?
2008-01-10 01038, 2008
luks
you don't need multiple annotations for that
2008-01-10 01057, 2008
aCiD2
Well I mean the annotation is the same, the web browser splits it up with javascript to make it more readable
2008-01-10 01058, 2008
ruaok sees no problem with large annotations
2008-01-10 01009, 2008
brianfreud
more just text-overload ru
2008-01-10 01054, 2008
brianfreud
if I pull the label page, seeing 4 pages of history, then 2 pages of editing notes on cat #s and such, then a bunch of SOCs, before I ever get down to release listings... just seems it could be presented cleaner
2008-01-10 01013, 2008
dalen has quit
2008-01-10 01026, 2008
aCiD2
sure, but it doesn't need multi annotations
2008-01-10 01030, 2008
aCiD2
just use javascript to present it
2008-01-10 01037, 2008
brianfreud
and aCiD2, yes, if we had a js scipt that could turn, say, each == == in an annotation into a tab, or whatever, it'd be doable
2008-01-10 01045, 2008
aCiD2
yup
2008-01-10 01051, 2008
aCiD2 may have a hack tomorrow, for kicks :)
2008-01-10 01053, 2008
brianfreud
hmmm, hald tempted to whip up a GM script to do just that :P
2008-01-10 01005, 2008
aCiD2
or there you go :)
2008-01-10 01010, 2008
dalen joined the channel
2008-01-10 01011, 2008
brianfreud
would you use = = or == == as the separator?
2008-01-10 01022, 2008
aCiD2
= xxx =
2008-01-10 01027, 2008
aCiD2
err, = xxx =
2008-01-10 01039, 2008
brianfreud
hmmm, how does that look in the current (non-js) view...
2008-01-10 01052, 2008
aCiD2
or just * xx:
2008-01-10 01043, 2008
brianfreud
yeah, = x = looks huge in normal view, I'd use the == x ==
2008-01-10 01059, 2008
aCiD2
Oh, annotations are formated with the wiki?
2008-01-10 01000, 2008
aCiD2
cool
2008-01-10 01007, 2008
brianfreud
yeah
2008-01-10 01047, 2008
brianfreud
it's not 100% full moin support, but 90% of it works
2008-01-10 01010, 2008
brianfreud
oh yeah, and I tested - it's not listed anywhere, but our moin version does support __test__ for underline
2008-01-10 01044, 2008
aCiD2
100% support but 90% functionality... how does that work? :P