#musicbrainz

/

      • yllona
        mikemorr: was it a noisy discussion? if so i would have ignored it ;)
      • 2008-05-15 13639, 2008

      • mikemorr
        It was somewhat high-traffic
      • 2008-05-15 13653, 2008

      • mikemorr
        but I think some good concepts came out of it
      • 2008-05-15 13659, 2008

      • yllona
        what was the gist of the argument?
      • 2008-05-15 13628, 2008

      • mikemorr
        Basically that we need to have a way to specify whether a release-level AR applies to all tracks without exception, applies to some tracks but we don't know which ones, or applies to the release as a whole but not the individual tracks (e.g. certain production ARs which have a different meaning at the track vs. release level)
      • 2008-05-15 13640, 2008

      • mikemorr
        Hence Type 1/2/3
      • 2008-05-15 13658, 2008

      • yllona
        oh that does make sense (for once) :-D
      • 2008-05-15 13636, 2008

      • mikemorr
        Actually I think I misused the "type 1/2/3" terminology. See http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/BarryPlatt for the three types of ARs
      • 2008-05-15 13600, 2008

      • mikemorr
        There can still be three different meanings for a release-level AR though
      • 2008-05-15 13628, 2008

      • yllona
        mikemorr: thanks for that :)
      • 2008-05-15 13622, 2008

      • mikemorr
        In the mb-style discussion (subject: "AR Types") there were some good suggestions for how the UI would prompt the user to select the right meaning when entering a release-level AR. Radio buttons and such.
      • 2008-05-15 13649, 2008

      • yllona
        that would be helpful
      • 2008-05-15 13623, 2008

      • yllona
        it does seem that most of the "fuzzy" stuff is more immediate in the re-mix/mash-up/sample arena, tho it should more clear on releases now, since that whole expensive debacle with de las soul, a few years back
      • 2008-05-15 13637, 2008

      • yllona
        *de la soul
      • 2008-05-15 13603, 2008

      • mikemorr
        What debacle was that?
      • 2008-05-15 13643, 2008

      • yllona
        de la didn't credit some of their samples on one of their hit songs
      • 2008-05-15 13603, 2008

      • yllona
        let me see if i can dig up the info, one sec
      • 2008-05-15 13618, 2008

      • mikemorr
        So "fuzzy" applies to that arena in the sense that a sample might be credited on a release but the specific track is not indicated?
      • 2008-05-15 13627, 2008

      • yllona
        yes
      • 2008-05-15 13637, 2008

      • yllona
        tho hardcore fans should be able to identify them upon listening, that's supposed to be part of the "fun"
      • 2008-05-15 13657, 2008

      • mikemorr
        Right :)
      • 2008-05-15 13641, 2008

      • yllona
        i can do it with early hip-hop, not so much any more as current artists are sampling other hip-hop releases, so it's like 2nd and 3rd generation dilution
      • 2008-05-15 13654, 2008

      • Amblin- has quit
      • 2008-05-15 13658, 2008

      • Amblin- joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13644, 2008

      • yllona
        using older jazz re-issues as an example, sometimes info just wasn't written down :)
      • 2008-05-15 13617, 2008

      • yllona
        again, you should be able to identify by "ear" though ;)
      • 2008-05-15 13639, 2008

      • mikemorr
        Agreed :)
      • 2008-05-15 13615, 2008

      • mikemorr
        Gotta run
      • 2008-05-15 13622, 2008

      • yllona
        here's the de la soul thing: "With all of the acclaim came some unwanted attention, most notably in the form of a lawsuit by the Turtles. De La Soul had sampled the Turtles' "You Showed Me" and layered it with a French lesson on a track on 3 Feet High called "Transmitting Live From Mars," without getting the permission of the '60s pop group. The Turtles won the case, and the decision not only had substantial impact on De La S
      • 2008-05-15 13638, 2008

      • yllona
        okay, see ya! thanks for the help
      • 2008-05-15 13612, 2008

      • yllona
        or more on de las soul: "Following the suit, all samples had to be legally cleared before an album could be released. Not only did this have the end result of rap reverting back to instrumentation, thereby altering how the artists worked, it also meant that several albums in the pipeline had to be delayed in order for samples to clear. One of those was De La Soul's second album, De La Soul Is Dead."
      • 2008-05-15 13630, 2008

      • mikemorr
        thank you! cheers!
      • 2008-05-15 13633, 2008

      • ijabz
        mikemorr:thanks I think I was a bit concerned that artist was overloaded to be performing artist and person but I guess that will be sorted in the NGS
      • 2008-05-15 13652, 2008

      • srotta has quit
      • 2008-05-15 13620, 2008

      • outsidecontext joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13630, 2008

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13606, 2008

      • brianfreud has quit
      • 2008-05-15 13657, 2008

      • Muzzz
        re
      • 2008-05-15 13616, 2008

      • deadchip joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13621, 2008

      • deadchip
        are tags available through the webapi?
      • 2008-05-15 13637, 2008

      • warp
        yes!
      • 2008-05-15 13621, 2008

      • inhouseuk
      • 2008-05-15 13626, 2008

      • brianfreud_ joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13600, 2008

      • warp
        deadchip: you can even submit tags through the webapi
      • 2008-05-15 13653, 2008

      • deadchip
        oh great
      • 2008-05-15 13621, 2008

      • deadchip
        although giving submission to everyone's hands might not be so good, if you look at what all ends up in Last.fm tags
      • 2008-05-15 13630, 2008

      • deadchip
        or it a voted edit? (i suppose not?)
      • 2008-05-15 13633, 2008

      • ijabz
        Would it be reasonable to treat tags as genres(if they were filtered through ID3v1 genre list)
      • 2008-05-15 13606, 2008

      • warp
        deadchip: the whole point of folksonomy is to let everyone tag everything with whatever _they_ think is useful.
      • 2008-05-15 13611, 2008

      • ijabz
        warp:webapi, youre talking about the xmlwebservice right?
      • 2008-05-15 13616, 2008

      • warp
        deadchip: from the chaos, order should emerge :)
      • 2008-05-15 13621, 2008

      • warp
        ijabz: yes.
      • 2008-05-15 13640, 2008

      • deadchip
        the problem i have is that SNR is still bad with Last.fm tags
      • 2008-05-15 13654, 2008

      • ijabz
        I cant see anything about submitting tags at http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/XMLWebService?highlig…
      • 2008-05-15 13606, 2008

      • deadchip
        in theory the amplitude of a tag also represents frequency but i think it could be better
      • 2008-05-15 13631, 2008

      • deadchip
        something like that a tag looses a little amplitude each day unless someone re-uses it
      • 2008-05-15 13637, 2008

      • warp
        ijabz: i have some example code in svn at http://svn.musicbrainz.org/miscellaneous/trunk/fo… , I _think_ the submitting is documented somewhere too, but don't know where.
      • 2008-05-15 13640, 2008

      • deadchip
        that way irrelevant tags would eventually totally disappear
      • 2008-05-15 13605, 2008

      • warp
        deadchip: how would you define 'use' ?
      • 2008-05-15 13617, 2008

      • deadchip
        warp, just retag something with an existing tag
      • 2008-05-15 13625, 2008

      • deadchip
        you can do it on LFM, don't know here
      • 2008-05-15 13654, 2008

      • warp
        ah, seems a bit silly. I already gave it the tag.
      • 2008-05-15 13635, 2008

      • warp
        i mean.. then i need to write scripts which go through my music collection to re-apply all my tags periodically :)
      • 2008-05-15 13648, 2008

      • deadchip
        yeah i guess
      • 2008-05-15 13617, 2008

      • deadchip
        so far i have no good solution for this, i don't store service-based tags permanently at all, just the ones user can given him/herself to the tracks
      • 2008-05-15 13653, 2008

      • nikki grumbles because she just found two more fake pound coins in her change >(
      • 2008-05-15 13602, 2008

      • warp
        nikki: aw :(
      • 2008-05-15 13611, 2008

      • warp
        deadchip: you can query which tags are yours at musicbrainz. you could use the tags by others on a release/track/artist, and override those with your own in those cases you care.
      • 2008-05-15 13638, 2008

      • deadchip
        interesting i didn't know you can view which are yours
      • 2008-05-15 13652, 2008

      • warp
        deadchip: you can at any time delete or replace your own tags, but not those of others.
      • 2008-05-15 13606, 2008

      • deadchip
        heh
      • 2008-05-15 13643, 2008

      • warp
        i should update that example code to append by default, instead of overwriting.
      • 2008-05-15 13653, 2008

      • brianfreud_
        good idea
      • 2008-05-15 13653, 2008

      • warp
        and make it clear which are yours and which are generic when listing.
      • 2008-05-15 13607, 2008

      • warp
        hello mr. freud.
      • 2008-05-15 13607, 2008

      • deadchip
        is it a webapp or standalone?
      • 2008-05-15 13610, 2008

      • deadchip
        i mean yours
      • 2008-05-15 13618, 2008

      • brianfreud_
        hi warp :)
      • 2008-05-15 13620, 2008

      • deadchip
        heh basically i meant to ask how i can run it
      • 2008-05-15 13635, 2008

      • warp
        deadchip: just commandline scripts, written in python.
      • 2008-05-15 13636, 2008

      • ijabz
        thanks for the code, no luck with doumentation though, checked the obvious places in the wiki
      • 2008-05-15 13606, 2008

      • warp
        ijabz: i'll have a quick look to see if i can find it. i mean i must have gotten the info from somewhere :)
      • 2008-05-15 13642, 2008

      • deadchip
        ?
      • 2008-05-15 13651, 2008

      • ojnkpjg
        the devel version of picard has support for using tags as genre
      • 2008-05-15 13619, 2008

      • ijabz
        ojnkpg:thats my firt question answered then
      • 2008-05-15 13651, 2008

      • warp
        ijabz: i guess it's only in the server release notes. http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ServerReleaseNotes/20…
      • 2008-05-15 13659, 2008

      • warp
        deadchip: the scripts I pointed at deal only with folksonomy tags.
      • 2008-05-15 13647, 2008

      • deadchip
        warp, what do you mean by only with folksonomy tags?
      • 2008-05-15 13636, 2008

      • ijabz
        warp:thanks I'll pastethis into the xmlwebservice wiki page
      • 2008-05-15 13657, 2008

      • warp
        deadchip: 'tags' is a bit confusing in this context. we call metadata in mp3s, oggs, flacs, etc.. tags. and we call the stuff on the website, similar to last.fm and flickr 'tags'.
      • 2008-05-15 13613, 2008

      • warp
        ijabz: great! thanks.
      • 2008-05-15 13636, 2008

      • warp
        deadchip: see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy , etc..
      • 2008-05-15 13636, 2008

      • deadchip
        yeah right ok i get it
      • 2008-05-15 13645, 2008

      • deadchip
        i've looked it up but i didn't get what distinction you made
      • 2008-05-15 13640, 2008

      • clever has quit
      • 2008-05-15 13651, 2008

      • Sargun joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13644, 2008

      • FauxFaux joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13600, 2008

      • FauxFaux looks at a copy of the whitburn data, as mentioned on mbusers.
      • 2008-05-15 13604, 2008

      • FauxFaux
        Basically, :S
      • 2008-05-15 13620, 2008

      • l7 joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13637, 2008

      • brianfreud_
        whitburn data comes in mulitple flavors... most totally unhelpful
      • 2008-05-15 13625, 2008

      • FauxFaux
        The excel spreadsheet I have here has artist, artistsortorder, featuring, track name, length, label and a lot of catalogue numbers.
      • 2008-05-15 13602, 2008

      • brianfreud_
        sounds like one of the newer versions of the data
      • 2008-05-15 13603, 2008

      • FauxFaux
        And written by / some bpms / genres. :/
      • 2008-05-15 13647, 2008

      • brianfreud_ gives up on this sound card, reboots to try another :/
      • 2008-05-15 13650, 2008

      • brianfreud_ has quit
      • 2008-05-15 13635, 2008

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13649, 2008

      • brianfreud has quit
      • 2008-05-15 13634, 2008

      • outsidecontext
        luks: what is about ticket #3702?
      • 2008-05-15 13656, 2008

      • Muzzz
        FauxFaux: my flatmate /hates/ Cascada D:
      • 2008-05-15 13618, 2008

      • Muzzz
        This does not bode well for me sitting here with it on, after having had turned up the subwoofer considerably \o/
      • 2008-05-15 13602, 2008

      • ijabz
        Im trying to get tags with http://musicbrainz.org/ws/1/tag?type=xml&id=b… , buts it nor returning any even though the artist (pixies) has some tags
      • 2008-05-15 13622, 2008

      • brianfreud_ joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13637, 2008

      • brianfreud_
        brianfreud_ is now known as BrianFreud
      • 2008-05-15 13658, 2008

      • BrianFreud
        yay! sound! :) ...coming from the wrong jack, but who cares ;)
      • 2008-05-15 13623, 2008

      • Muzzz
        ijabz: I'm being prompted for username/password credentials :/
      • 2008-05-15 13627, 2008

      • Muzzz
        For that URL you posted
      • 2008-05-15 13642, 2008

      • Muzzz
        Which is weird considering my bot still appears tow ork fine;
      • 2008-05-15 13644, 2008

      • Muzzz
        ?lookup artist c0b2500e-0cef-4130-869d-732b23ed9df5
      • 2008-05-15 13645, 2008

      • omgponies
      • 2008-05-15 13626, 2008

      • gioele has quit
      • 2008-05-15 13649, 2008

      • ijabz
        Oh so do I now I open a different browser, but if yo enter a correct mb account it then takes you to the xml output but with no tag data
      • 2008-05-15 13655, 2008

      • warp
        ijabz: /tag probably only contains _your_ tags, which is why it is asking for username/password.
      • 2008-05-15 13602, 2008

      • warp
        ijabz: use inc=tags to get all tags.
      • 2008-05-15 13618, 2008

      • warp
        (i'm half-guessing, but that seems to be going on :)
      • 2008-05-15 13600, 2008

      • FauxFaux
        Muzzz: Nobody hates cascada! D:
      • 2008-05-15 13605, 2008

      • outsidecontext
        ijabz: the way you try it will only return your tags
      • 2008-05-15 13658, 2008

      • outsidecontext
      • 2008-05-15 13653, 2008

      • l8nite joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13615, 2008

      • outsidecontext
        the entity /tag can and should only be used to GET or POST user tags
      • 2008-05-15 13658, 2008

      • ijabz
        oh i see
      • 2008-05-15 13627, 2008

      • Remosi
        alastairp, gnrrg :)
      • 2008-05-15 13638, 2008

      • Eitch joined the channel
      • 2008-05-15 13630, 2008

      • Eitch
        Hi, is there a CLI program (linux) to generate IDs (TRMs) from music? I want to create a script that reads TRM from a file, send to MusicBrainz and return the Artist - Track Title information :)
      • 2008-05-15 13654, 2008

      • nikki
        you should be using PUIDs and not TRMs.
      • 2008-05-15 13659, 2008

      • FauxFaux
        Eitch: TRMs are dead, use PUIDs instead, and there's still no app. :)
      • 2008-05-15 13603, 2008

      • Eitch
        hehe
      • 2008-05-15 13627, 2008

      • nikki
        there's genpuid, which is hidden away in the depths of the musicip servers
      • 2008-05-15 13639, 2008

      • Eitch
        I see, i tried to use a command called "puid" that comes with the library on linux but I can't get it to work tho :(
      • 2008-05-15 13651, 2008

      • Eitch
        hehe
      • 2008-05-15 13650, 2008

      • Eitch
        "$ puid -L naosei.mp3" -> "No PUID available for this track." But using a program (amarok) for trying to guess the tags from the track works fine
      • 2008-05-15 13615, 2008

      • Remosi
        hmm
      • 2008-05-15 13619, 2008

      • FauxFaux
        Some versions of amarok do still use TRMs, but that error message is obviously not helpful.
      • 2008-05-15 13621, 2008

      • Remosi
        I have one somewhere I think
      • 2008-05-15 13631, 2008

      • Remosi
        but for puids
      • 2008-05-15 13611, 2008

      • Remosi
      • 2008-05-15 13620, 2008

      • Remosi
        you'll probably have to pull the entire tree to get all the relevant libraries
      • 2008-05-15 13625, 2008

      • Remosi
        and you need libofa installed too
      • 2008-05-15 13621, 2008

      • ijabz
        Ive put some info in http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/XMLWebService?action=… on tags, not brilliant but its a start
      • 2008-05-15 13629, 2008

      • Eitch
        Checking :)