hrm, "made twelve recordings (ten of which were issued) for Bluebird as the Chatman [sic] Brothers"
2008-10-07 28152, 2008
hawke_
At that point I'm pretty stuck though. Can't find anything for what those recordings might be.
2008-10-07 28103, 2008
Wizzcat
apparantly it was recorded by tommy mclennan in 1940 on bluebird, so presumably it must've been before that
2008-10-07 28103, 2008
drsaunde
The Mclennan recording is 1941 (found that)..still looking for the other one
2008-10-07 28119, 2008
Cord
. o O ( an AR stating a relationship between bands would also be nice, Band A is the successor of Band B or something. )
2008-10-07 28134, 2008
drsaunde
i couldn't find any evidence of a 1940 Chatmon recording anywhere (by him or his various bands with his brothers)... other sources list the Mclennan version as the original.. maybe we should go with that
2008-10-07 28107, 2008
Kerensky97
cord: ALOT of people want that.
2008-10-07 28130, 2008
hawke_
drsaunde: sounds good to me.
2008-10-07 28147, 2008
Wizzcat
Kerensky97: btw, what happened to your RFC
2008-10-07 28145, 2008
Kerensky97
I don't know, I mostly just suggested it because ruaok said to mention it in mbstyle. But apparently it doesn't let me post there any more.
2008-10-07 28133, 2008
ruaok shrugs
2008-10-07 28143, 2008
Kerensky97
I think it's because I dropped my subscription to the list.
2008-10-07 28147, 2008
ruaok
hmmm. its fall in california. 28C at noon.
2008-10-07 28138, 2008
Wizzcat
it seemed rather similar to EarlierReleaseOf to me though
2008-10-07 28157, 2008
Kerensky97
But we can't use existing ARs.
2008-10-07 28101, 2008
Kerensky97
That's the point.
2008-10-07 28145, 2008
Wizzcat
won't ERO be redundant if/when we get release clustering though?
2008-10-07 28154, 2008
Wizzcat
or wait, remasters.. hmm
2008-10-07 28117, 2008
Wizzcat
oh well, I'll leave it to smarter people :>
2008-10-07 28126, 2008
Kerensky97
I think alot of those ARs kind of overlap now as it is.
2008-10-07 28107, 2008
Sargun joined the channel
2008-10-07 28101, 2008
hawke_
drsaunde: do you want to point me at the Mclennan release so I can add it, or do you want to add it yourself and point me to it so I can add the AR?
2008-10-07 28153, 2008
drsaunde
ok one sec
2008-10-07 28116, 2008
ruaok ponders the name "data porn" for the upcoming releases/recently deceseased page
[13:00] warp srotta: knowing two languages, if one of them is more fit to express a concept, why should I limit myself to the other language when I know the listener understands both? <-- I agrees
2008-10-07 28152, 2008
CatCat
i have that going all the time
2008-10-07 28155, 2008
CatCat
both ways
2008-10-07 28158, 2008
juhae
Zeitgeist
2008-10-07 28102, 2008
juhae
n : the spirit of the time; the spirit characteristic of an age or generation [syn: Zeitgeist]
2008-10-07 28117, 2008
CatCat
i talk norwegian and suddenly i dunno a word so i use an english.
2008-10-07 28132, 2008
CatCat
as you can see here in irc, i do the opposite quite a much as well
2008-10-07 28145, 2008
CatCat
uh, zeitgeist doesnt fit at all then
2008-10-07 28152, 2008
CatCat
what's wrong with "trivia"?
2008-10-07 28154, 2008
juhae
just before you asked, i was about to say how zeitgeist is prolly another bad name for the page
2008-10-07 28153, 2008
CatCat
seriousyl. it's trivia, whats wrong with trivia?
2008-10-07 28153, 2008
ruaok
I don't like it. that's one reason. :)
2008-10-07 28122, 2008
CatCat
if that's the only reason, no offence, but it's a bad one
2008-10-07 28146, 2008
CatCat
the only other i can think of is "stats"
2008-10-07 28158, 2008
ruaok
trivia: matters or things that are very unimportant, inconsequential, or nonessential; trifles; trivialities.
2008-10-07 28107, 2008
ruaok
upcoming releases are not meaningless.
2008-10-07 28122, 2008
CatCat
to me trivia means "interesting to know, but not vital to your exsistance"
2008-10-07 28101, 2008
CatCat
trivia originates fro mthe word trivial, but its colloquious name has evolved from that to mean point of interest
2008-10-07 28107, 2008
CatCat
in a way doing a 180
2008-10-07 28111, 2008
CatCat
in meaning
2008-10-07 28110, 2008
CatCat
fux0r about with pretend latin and call it "intrivida"
2008-10-07 28115, 2008
CatCat
"not trivial"
2008-10-07 28149, 2008
hawke_
I don't think that's true. Trivia still means unimportant.
2008-10-07 28101, 2008
CatCat
yes. and no
2008-10-07 28102, 2008
hawke_
"interesting stuff that doesn't matter"
2008-10-07 28108, 2008
CatCat
like a brand name it has a secondary meaning
2008-10-07 28115, 2008
hawke_
example?
2008-10-07 28130, 2008
CatCat
almost all sites that has such a page use it as a name for it
