22:53 PM
alastairp
which suggests IO
2009-02-24 05511, 2009
22:53 PM
alastairp
e.g., network
2009-02-24 05531, 2009
22:53 PM
sonium1 has quit
2009-02-24 05533, 2009
22:53 PM
chefkoch
chefkoch is now known as chefkoch_AW
2009-02-24 05553, 2009
22:53 PM
chefkoch_AW has quit
2009-02-24 05557, 2009
22:53 PM
ruaok
well, ya its blasting search results to the main web server.
2009-02-24 05504, 2009
22:54 PM
ruaok
but the main web server is equally idle.
2009-02-24 05508, 2009
22:54 PM
pronik
outsidecontext: still around?
2009-02-24 05512, 2009
22:54 PM
alastairp
heh, right
2009-02-24 05522, 2009
22:54 PM
ruaok
loads of procs waiting for results from the search server.
2009-02-24 05528, 2009
22:54 PM
outsidecontext
pronik, yes
2009-02-24 05536, 2009
22:54 PM
pronik
2009-02-24 05541, 2009
22:54 PM
pronik
how about that?
2009-02-24 05552, 2009
22:54 PM
ruaok
there I can see that the CPU utilization is low -- beause most procs are blocked.
2009-02-24 05555, 2009
22:54 PM
luks
ugh
2009-02-24 05524, 2009
22:55 PM
luks
documenation is nice, but separately
2009-02-24 05557, 2009
22:55 PM
pronik
as a context help?
2009-02-24 05500, 2009
22:56 PM
outsidecontext
too much info :( that reverts the improvements on the file naming page
2009-02-24 05506, 2009
22:56 PM
luks
as a manual
2009-02-24 05513, 2009
22:56 PM
pronik
That's why I posted a picture first
2009-02-24 05508, 2009
22:57 PM
outsidecontext
what about keeping it simple? like the encoding selection was in one line?
2009-02-24 05509, 2009
22:57 PM
navap
While I tag all my files with 2.4, I don't think its a good idea to stress that as the *current standard* since as it rightly states, a lot of pyalers lack 2.4 support.
2009-02-24 05516, 2009
22:57 PM
pronik
OK, got feedback, back to the drawing board ;)
2009-02-24 05530, 2009
22:57 PM
outsidecontext
:)
2009-02-24 05537, 2009
22:57 PM
navap
UTF-8 is good to stress though.
2009-02-24 05553, 2009
22:57 PM
ruaok
anyone feel like handling an email from a band member who needs to correct some of their data?
2009-02-24 05555, 2009
22:57 PM
navap
Would have prevented a lot of headache for me a couple of minthes ago.
2009-02-24 05502, 2009
22:58 PM
navap
monthes*
2009-02-24 05507, 2009
22:58 PM
pronik
what about the "don't mess with it if you don't know what you are doing" line?
2009-02-24 05516, 2009
22:58 PM
pronik
leave or throw out?
2009-02-24 05558, 2009
22:58 PM
luks
most of people do need to mess with it
2009-02-24 05516, 2009
22:59 PM
luks
so please just "Version of ID3 tags: (.) ID3v2.4 ( ) ID3v2.3"
2009-02-24 05523, 2009
22:59 PM
luks
two lines, like the encoding is currently
2009-02-24 05511, 2009
23:00 PM
pronik
no problem
2009-02-24 05531, 2009
23:00 PM
pronik
2009-02-24 05548, 2009
23:00 PM
luks
I really don't like inline documenation, which is there just for people who are not able to read the documenation
2009-02-24 05551, 2009
23:00 PM
luks
yes
2009-02-24 05500, 2009
23:01 PM
luks
that's exactly where is should be
2009-02-24 05545, 2009
23:02 PM
CosmicRay has quit
2009-02-24 05543, 2009
23:03 PM
nikki finds the inline docs a bit scary looking :o
2009-02-24 05559, 2009
23:03 PM
pronik
don't worry, they are on their way to the wiki already ;)
2009-02-24 05548, 2009
23:04 PM
nikki
hehe
2009-02-24 05513, 2009
23:05 PM
yllona has quit
2009-02-24 05530, 2009
23:07 PM
pronik
outsidecontext, luks: done, pushing out
2009-02-24 05546, 2009
23:07 PM
luks
thanks
2009-02-24 05503, 2009
23:08 PM
outsidecontext
thanks
2009-02-24 05515, 2009
23:09 PM
pronik
2009-02-24 05536, 2009
23:13 PM
outsidecontext
pronik, sorry to be picky, but i liked the old text for the encoding better
2009-02-24 05500, 2009
23:14 PM
outsidecontext
but maybe just because i was used to it, don't know
2009-02-24 05549, 2009
23:14 PM
outsidecontext
ah, keep it as it is now. it's cleaner now :)
2009-02-24 05515, 2009
23:15 PM
pronik
which old text? ;)
2009-02-24 05557, 2009
23:18 PM
outsidecontext
never mind, it was the text "text encoding to use for blah blah". i just compared the both versions side by side and yours is much cleaner
2009-02-24 05511, 2009
23:20 PM
toxickore joined the channel
2009-02-24 05529, 2009
23:22 PM
pronik
this whole page looks rather empty now :)
2009-02-24 05509, 2009
23:23 PM
luks
it's supposed to be much smaller
2009-02-24 05549, 2009
23:44 PM
nikki
oh, luks, does ngs handle box sets at all?
2009-02-24 05516, 2009
23:45 PM
ruaok
it does, iirc.
2009-02-24 05535, 2009
23:45 PM
ruaok
just not arbirary numbers of levels of products.
2009-02-24 05538, 2009
23:45 PM
nikki
I know it handles multiple discs
2009-02-24 05502, 2009
23:47 PM
Mirrakor has quit
2009-02-24 05546, 2009
23:47 PM
luks
how is a box set different from a multi disc release?
2009-02-24 05535, 2009
23:48 PM
nikki
well, a cd case in a box set could have more than one disc
2009-02-24 05509, 2009
23:51 PM
nikki
I was mostly asking because it came up earlier
2009-02-24 05533, 2009
23:51 PM
luks
I think just numbering the discs like 1.1, 1.2 would work well enough
2009-02-24 05552, 2009
23:51 PM
sonium has quit
2009-02-24 05559, 2009
23:51 PM
nikki
so 1.1 would be the first disc in the first cd case?
2009-02-24 05507, 2009
23:52 PM
luks
yes
2009-02-24 05523, 2009
23:52 PM
nikki
that seems like it might work
2009-02-24 05534, 2009
23:52 PM
nikki
well, I'm sure someone will throw some spanners... they always do :)
2009-02-24 05558, 2009
23:52 PM
luks
I'd rather not support that directly on multiple levels in the database
2009-02-24 05534, 2009
23:53 PM
luks
it complicates the schema and the user interface, but it applies only to minimum releases
2009-02-24 05540, 2009
23:53 PM
nikki nods
2009-02-24 05530, 2009
23:54 PM
luks
same for tape/vinyl sides, I'd rather just allow non-numeric track numbers than represent them in the database
2009-02-24 05527, 2009
23:56 PM
nikki
that reminds me... would ngs be able to handle multiple sides of dualdiscs/vinyldiscs?
2009-02-24 05557, 2009
23:56 PM
nikki
I remember you saying something about disc IDs not having to be an entire tracklist, but I don't know if that was ngs or just what you'd like to see
2009-02-24 05557, 2009
23:57 PM
luks
I'm still not sure what to do with disc ids
