#musicbrainz

/

      • nikki
        how do they know how they should vote if they can't understand the argument?
      • 2009-02-01 03246, 2009

      • srotta
        I probably wouldn't vote on that sort of edit, but I can understand the reasoning.
      • 2009-02-01 03208, 2009

      • srotta
        So the votes should go through?
      • 2009-02-01 03213, 2009

      • srotta
        Edits, I mean.
      • 2009-02-01 03247, 2009

      • nikki
        I don't know, I don't speak russian to research it myself :P
      • 2009-02-01 03209, 2009

      • nikki
        but like I said, I think I'd prefer to not include info like that if it's questionable
      • 2009-02-01 03225, 2009

      • nikki
        I mean... how on earth is the guy supposed to prove he *didn't* marry someone?
      • 2009-02-01 03248, 2009

      • srotta
        Providing he is the guy. ;)
      • 2009-02-01 03206, 2009

      • nikki
        well, anyone, how do they prove someone didn't marry someone?
      • 2009-02-01 03215, 2009

      • srotta
        Yeah, that is a problem in general, proving something didn't happen or doesn't exist is much harder than the other way round.
      • 2009-02-01 03221, 2009

      • neomaq
        waterwind post translation: (sorry for poor english): "on my opinion information about group must be pumped from official sources(for exam. from oficial siteof band "waterwind", but not from suspicious sources. Also i must not reporting about self to anyone- then i married and divorced"
      • 2009-02-01 03208, 2009

      • nikki
        so he did marry and then get divorced?
      • 2009-02-01 03245, 2009

      • xlotlu
        i particularly enjoy the last part :)
      • 2009-02-01 03221, 2009

      • warp
        nikki: you have a convincing argument, commented and voted accordingly.
      • 2009-02-01 03207, 2009

      • neomaq
        there is no info about WHAT hi did, i am look at official site of "melnitsa"
      • 2009-02-01 03234, 2009

      • warp
        ah
      • 2009-02-01 03243, 2009

      • xlotlu
        i do wonder however.... why would MB need such ARs?
      • 2009-02-01 03235, 2009

      • nikki
        you could question a lot of our relationships :P
      • 2009-02-01 03206, 2009

      • srotta
        Particularly if we stick to official sites, we can remove quite a lot of ARs :P
      • 2009-02-01 03244, 2009

      • xlotlu
        Mr. X f*cked Mrs. Y from january 2009 to february 2009...
      • 2009-02-01 03254, 2009

      • nikki
        constantly? :o
      • 2009-02-01 03201, 2009

      • nikki
        they must be pretty tired :o
      • 2009-02-01 03202, 2009

      • warp
        lol
      • 2009-02-01 03212, 2009

      • nikki
        we do have 'was involved with' though
      • 2009-02-01 03223, 2009

      • warp
        we do? wow.
      • 2009-02-01 03230, 2009

      • xlotlu
        no, really. how's that relevant to musicbrainz?
      • 2009-02-01 03249, 2009

      • xlotlu
        leave the crap to the media and wikipedia...
      • 2009-02-01 03218, 2009

      • warp
        xlotlu: i expect it often does affect the music of the artists involved.
      • 2009-02-01 03219, 2009

      • nikki
        the only ones I've ever used that I know of are sibling ones
      • 2009-02-01 03222, 2009

      • nikki
        hmm...
      • 2009-02-01 03233, 2009

      • nikki
        how will we translate relationships?
      • 2009-02-01 03200, 2009

      • nikki
        there are quite a few which barely work in english, they have no hope in other languages...
      • 2009-02-01 03219, 2009

      • xlotlu
        warp: jean michel jarre composed geometry of love while being head over heels for isabelle adjani
      • 2009-02-01 03245, 2009

      • xlotlu
        while that's probably quite relevant for the outcome, i find it simply irrelevant for MB
      • 2009-02-01 03202, 2009

      • warp
        I mean, if both persons involved are musicicians (they should be, otherwise one of them shouldn't be in the DB usually), you will in some cases hear the influences from one of them in the work of the other.
      • 2009-02-01 03201, 2009

      • warp
        xlotlu: in your example, isabelle is not really a participant other than perhaps as a muse.
      • 2009-02-01 03223, 2009

      • neomaq
        nikki in official sources no information about marriage Den Skurida and Maria Larina, but strange in some source she acts as Maria Skurida, but not on http://waterwind.ru/
      • 2009-02-01 03223, 2009

      • warp
        ooh, a muse AR! ;)
      • 2009-02-01 03234, 2009

      • xlotlu
        warp: maybe she was humming what turned into the album theme when getting naked out of the shower...
      • 2009-02-01 03256, 2009

      • warp
        xlotlu: haha, ok
      • 2009-02-01 03238, 2009

      • warp
        xlotlu: anyway, for me that is enough to make it relevant to MB.
      • 2009-02-01 03249, 2009

      • xlotlu
        or maybe a falling brick hit jarre in the head at the time, so he got the idea for his music. and his infatuation with adjani was coincidental
      • 2009-02-01 03200, 2009

      • nikki
        neomaq: thanks
      • 2009-02-01 03210, 2009

      • Milosz
        hey nikki do you know Mansfield? the band
      • 2009-02-01 03214, 2009

      • srotta
        xlotlu: So you're saying we should have image attributes for relationship ARs?
      • 2009-02-01 03230, 2009

      • Milosz
        it's japanese so i figured.. maybe you do
      • 2009-02-01 03238, 2009

      • Milosz
        heh
      • 2009-02-01 03237, 2009

      • nikki
        nope, why?
      • 2009-02-01 03258, 2009

      • Milosz
        just wondering
      • 2009-02-01 03208, 2009

      • Milosz
        i'm totally falling in love with this one album
      • 2009-02-01 03221, 2009

      • Milosz
        so i wanted to ask if someone else likes it
      • 2009-02-01 03209, 2009

      • Milosz
        just that ;)
      • 2009-02-01 03230, 2009

      • nikki
        ah ok
      • 2009-02-01 03238, 2009

      • neomaq
        luks how i can check results of hourly crontab script? on mb server page still "This mirror was last updated: 2009-01-21 00:00:03.655208+00"
      • 2009-02-01 03257, 2009

      • neomaq
        luks i think some errors occurs
      • 2009-02-01 03203, 2009

      • luks
        neomaq: do you have slave.log in the root of your mb_server intallation?
      • 2009-02-01 03204, 2009

      • neomaq
        luks no :( `find / -name slave.log` thers is no such file in filesystem
      • 2009-02-01 03220, 2009

      • luks
        hm, which script do you have in cron?
      • 2009-02-01 03245, 2009

      • luks
        normally it should be admin/cron/slave.sh
      • 2009-02-01 03210, 2009

      • luks
        if you use admin/replication/LoadReplicationChanges directly, you need to redirect the output (and stderr) somewhere
      • 2009-02-01 03201, 2009

      • neomaq crontab was '15 * * * * root /home/mbserver/svn/mb_server/admin/cron/hourly.sh'
      • 2009-02-01 03205, 2009

      • nikki wonders what slave.sh does
      • 2009-02-01 03217, 2009

      • luks
        um, hourly.sh, why?
      • 2009-02-01 03223, 2009

      • luks
        I don't think that does replication
      • 2009-02-01 03239, 2009

      • luks
        it *produces* replication packets, at best :)
      • 2009-02-01 03213, 2009

      • luks
        nikki: just runs LoadReplicationChanges with logrotated log file
      • 2009-02-01 03236, 2009

      • nikki
        ah ok
      • 2009-02-01 03259, 2009

      • nikki has always used LoadReplicationChanges
      • 2009-02-01 03227, 2009

      • neomaq
        luks fix this, waiting for cronjob runs (2 min remaining)
      • 2009-02-01 03255, 2009

      • luks
        will take some time to update the DB
      • 2009-02-01 03217, 2009

      • luks
        at least 240 packets to import
      • 2009-02-01 03209, 2009

      • nikki
        I should probably make mine use cron...
      • 2009-02-01 03218, 2009

      • neomaq
        145 1368 76% 9 89"
      • 2009-02-01 03226, 2009

      • luks
        hm, I wonder how well can handle ext3 about 1M files
      • 2009-02-01 03231, 2009

      • nikki
        thinking of extracting freedb data?
      • 2009-02-01 03204, 2009

      • luks
        discogs
      • 2009-02-01 03225, 2009

      • nikki
        ah
      • 2009-02-01 03230, 2009

      • luks
        but I guess I should better import it into some kind of database
      • 2009-02-01 03235, 2009

      • luks
        even sqlite might do the job
      • 2009-02-01 03239, 2009

      • nikki
        hehe
      • 2009-02-01 03258, 2009

      • luks
        it's 371.6M gzipped, can't be that bigh
      • 2009-02-01 03259, 2009

      • luks
        -h
      • 2009-02-01 03209, 2009

      • nikki
        I was going to insert the freedb stuff into sqlite once just so I could search the bloody thing
      • 2009-02-01 03244, 2009

      • nikki
        oh, luks, would simply making the aliases in the db not unique break anything?
      • 2009-02-01 03228, 2009

      • luks
        I think some of the current code relies on it
      • 2009-02-01 03246, 2009

      • nikki
        oh?
      • 2009-02-01 03246, 2009

      • luks
        but nothing major
      • 2009-02-01 03253, 2009

      • luks
        should be simple to fix
      • 2009-02-01 03221, 2009

      • luks
        it's just a few checks, those could be simply removed
      • 2009-02-01 03237, 2009

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2009-02-01 03235, 2009

      • luks
        damn, this is not going to be fun. the huge XML file is not actually valid XML
      • 2009-02-01 03243, 2009

      • nikki
        :S
      • 2009-02-01 03254, 2009

      • nikki
        what's invalid?
      • 2009-02-01 03214, 2009

      • nikki
        I mean... what are they doing that's invalid
      • 2009-02-01 03237, 2009

      • luks
        it doesn't have a single root element, that's the first thing I've noticed before writing any code
      • 2009-02-01 03253, 2009

      • luks
        I know they also have some XML-forbitten characters in the data
      • 2009-02-01 03203, 2009

      • luks
        \2 or something
      • 2009-02-01 03217, 2009

      • nikki tuts at them
      • 2009-02-01 03235, 2009

      • CStan joined the channel
      • 2009-02-01 03255, 2009

      • v6lur_ joined the channel
      • 2009-02-01 03232, 2009

      • Milosz
        maybe it's XML 1.1
      • 2009-02-01 03222, 2009

      • luks
        I think it's called "tag soup" normally :)
      • 2009-02-01 03235, 2009

      • luks
        hm, I just realized they don't actually have multi-disc releases in their schema
      • 2009-02-01 03251, 2009

      • CStan has left the channel
      • 2009-02-01 03207, 2009

      • nikki
        what do they have?
      • 2009-02-01 03223, 2009

      • v6lur has quit
      • 2009-02-01 03229, 2009

      • luks
        track numbers like 1-1, 2-1
      • 2009-02-01 03243, 2009

      • luks
        actually, it's even not constent
      • 2009-02-01 03200, 2009

      • luks
        1-1, 1-01, 1.1
      • 2009-02-01 03244, 2009

      • the_p has quit
      • 2009-02-01 03227, 2009

      • Milosz
        that's nice..
      • 2009-02-01 03232, 2009

      • the_p joined the channel
      • 2009-02-01 03206, 2009

      • nikki
        luks: I was also wondering... do you know why pending aliases don't show up on the alias page?
      • 2009-02-01 03252, 2009

      • luks
        because the moderation code doesn't add them to the database until the edit is approved
      • 2009-02-01 03258, 2009

      • nikki
        ah
      • 2009-02-01 03205, 2009

      • nikki
        that's not so easy to fix I guess
      • 2009-02-01 03228, 2009

      • luks
        not very hard either
      • 2009-02-01 03225, 2009

      • nikki
        hmm... I guess I can't bribe you with chocolate...
      • 2009-02-01 03249, 2009

      • luks
        maybe you can :)
      • 2009-02-01 03202, 2009

      • nikki
        really? :o
      • 2009-02-01 03210, 2009

      • luks
        the only problem I see that we need to either close all add alias edits before updating the server or add a new edit type
      • 2009-02-01 03229, 2009

      • luks
        not sure which option is better
      • 2009-02-01 03240, 2009

      • nikki
        they're easy enough to approve
      • 2009-02-01 03229, 2009

      • alastair1 joined the channel
      • 2009-02-01 03251, 2009

      • nikki
        what would happen if we didn't close them all before updating it?
      • 2009-02-01 03217, 2009

      • luks
        the code would try to remove aliases that don't exist yet
      • 2009-02-01 03234, 2009

      • luks
        well, that's in case they are voted one
      • 2009-02-01 03245, 2009

      • luks
        in case they are accepted they would never be added
      • 2009-02-01 03217, 2009

      • luks
        *voted down
      • 2009-02-01 03252, 2009

      • nikki
        so we could approve them before upgrading, and if any sneak in after that, approve those after upgrading and re-enter them?
      • 2009-02-01 03218, 2009

      • luks
        yeah, that should work
      • 2009-02-01 03205, 2009

      • LotR has quit
      • 2009-02-01 03210, 2009

      • alastairp has quit
      • 2009-02-01 03219, 2009

      • luks
        hehe, Alias::Insert sets errno to EEXIST
      • 2009-02-01 03207, 2009

      • CatCat
        aaah yea, i remember when i was regular mod, I *hated* that aliases didn't show up
      • 2009-02-01 03252, 2009

      • CatCat
        becoming automod, one of the first things I was thinking was "yay! now aliases will show up immediately!"
      • 2009-02-01 03225, 2009

      • CatCat
        it was, heh, one of my big incentives to *becoming* automod
      • 2009-02-01 03252, 2009

      • nikki
        they've bothered quite a few people for quite a long time :P
      • 2009-02-01 03259, 2009

      • CatCat
        indeed
      • 2009-02-01 03201, 2009

      • nikki
        hence me being willing to bribe people to fix it :P
      • 2009-02-01 03216, 2009

      • CatCat
        nelol that it's taken much a long time
      • 2009-02-01 03223, 2009

      • CatCat
        such*
      • 2009-02-01 03249, 2009

      • CatCat
        nelol --> not even laughable
      • 2009-02-01 03255, 2009

      • CatCat
        Koji Kondo ~ Gerudo Valley (1:34) (from The Legend of Zelda Original Soundtrack) (1998)
      • 2009-02-01 03213, 2009

      • CatCat
        this song is awesome
      • 2009-02-01 03229, 2009

      • CatCat
        s/song/tune/
      • 2009-02-01 03212, 2009

      • CatCat
        nikki: need anything help with bribing materials? :D
      • 2009-02-01 03227, 2009

      • nikki
        I don't know what luks would like
      • 2009-02-01 03205, 2009

      • sonium1 joined the channel
      • 2009-02-01 03212, 2009

      • CatCat
        aaask him