#musicbrainz

;_;

cat chasing is hard work ya know

;_;

dumme ulv!

such an uncivilized cat resorting to violence

Hehe, screw lunch, I found chocolate cake :3

hey i'm not the one that's fighting. I'm just going to make you do it :]

I think they say that's the thing that makes cats rule and dogs drool

\o/

course I like dogs and cats, and wolves. :D

:-)

What about foxes?

Nyght!! save me from this tre!

Them red cunning little beasts.

fuchs?

Foxes are great too!

mo, just jump, you'll and on all fours

Hehe, there's a family of foxes that like to rummage through the bins in my back garden

yes but there is a big scary wolf under here

awww

we have some foxes here too

not that I've seen any close though.

+l

There's a proper van thingy softname method

its some last name, va, some firstname, :]

Ah

van*

beethoven, ludwig van

yes that's the current

it depends on their country of birth

yes

uh oh.. what about an american born artist?

depends if they use it like the dutch

I kinda like how when aprove a mod, I get into the 'super voting mode'

I don't know honestly.

nothing but the mo idself to distrackt me on thepage

What mods need to be voted on anyways besides move items?

hæ?

well there is merge, edit, add link, what have you

theres about 6300 mods to be voted on

Someone said earlier that merges had to be voted on, couldn't be approved. So, I was wondering what votes I should concentrate on more..

only add tracktimes and release, change case is automods

Mudcrow: I realize that... ;) but, when say, a third of those can be approved by an automod, it seems like votes given should be to those that can't be approved by an automod.

oh, so leave lal the work to us then?

no chance

merge and delete cant be approved

No.. but make the voting count instead of voting on one thing and having an automod come around right after and approve it. Therefore making both teams effective?

and of course. we can aproive, but not autofai lanything

thank you Mudcrow

so any *wrong* mods would stil lneed no votes

well of course, but I can start at what can't be auto'd and then go to my normal votes. since I have to dig for votes anyways. :D

catmo: i don't fight against wolves, i fight for them

good for you

I think, considering the amount of open mods, that the chances a automod approving a mod after you have voted yes is slim

;) I don't know.. my mods are getting approved pretty regularly. :D

That's in no way a complaint!

i like the approve feature a lot

me to

it's nice for squashing open AR mods that are obviously right

as do I

I should use it more

and other things

i usually approve instead of voting yes because i only vote on my subscribed artists, and i won't vote yes unless i'm sure

now i vote yes if i think it's probably correct

like an album add mod i'm too lazy to look up to verify

I often aprove if thereis a slight error (to no fault of the newbie) and then edit it. (with modnotes of course)

I felt the same way ojnkpjg, but i found I can actually look up a lot of things and at least try and help the amount of open mods, even if they aren't "my artists".

I do the same sometimes mo, its sometimes a lot quicker to approve, correct and then explain what was wrong, then waiting for someone else to correct it

mud: ding!

and I have general knowledge about a lot of groups, but only specific and precise knowledge on those artists I subscribe to. Those are the ones I can usually say yes or no by simply looking at the mod, because I've learned them that intimately.

and as long as there is explanation somewhere, with a link usually it helps a lot!

ooohh

ah, someone will intrigue you eventually.

:)

someone have

but he is literally living on the other side of the palnet :(

planet

That sucks! tell him to move.

he can't affor it poor luff1

and you're stable where you are I imagine.

not so much as being stable here as being unstable everywhere else

:)

but of course, HUGE difference there. :D

there is actually, ifyou don't mind

oh how I love lucene

Geh, I am going to end up voting no on almost all of these deletion tracks.

erh.. of course you should, only tracks that should be deleted are nats and data tracks

actually yes, I know there's a difference. I was just teasing mo

ok! :)

what are nats?

None album tracks

*Non

ah, thank you!

You're welcome!

I've seen that a lot lately and didn't know for a fact

wish I could leave the same note on a buncha mods. :D

arg

it doesn't sound like puid at all!

It dooooes

puid doesn't sound like pweed at all!

Does so.

does not!

: (

I like puds. :D but.. that's me.

lol

that's how I read it

but with an 'i' sound i nthere

yay kitaro

Oooo! I've got an early birthday card from my mom-in-law

ooohh

awww :)

wow, it's postmarked the 4th, that was fast!

ahh I don't see the pun in the name before I pronounce it http://musicbrainz.org/showartist.html?artistid...

that's happened several times

hei russsssss

hi

I still don't get the pun in the name, but their wikipedia entry is atrociously bad.

sru thirty tuu

oh? eek I soulds.. not vote yes then

hii russssssss

hi again :P

Mostly I mean that the wikipage is just retarded and full of information which is rather trivial and sounds more like a marketing scheme than an "encyclopaedia entry" or so

uff da

But that's a quite a common Wikipedia thing

someone that knows anytrhing abut the band should really clean that out

For instance, the first paragraph is about some stickers the band has distributed. After the first chapter (which makes up most of the entry), I still don't know anything about the band. :D