#musicbrainz

/

      • wolfsong13
        there are more than just keyboards
      • 2006-05-25 14540, 2006

      • mudcrow
        theres big keyboards and little keybords
      • 2006-05-25 14551, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        and the ones with hammers and strings inside
      • 2006-05-25 14553, 2006

      • Joan_W
        hve you looked recently - there are all types of keyboards from organs down to harpsichords
      • 2006-05-25 14506, 2006

      • Joan_W
        and inbetween
      • 2006-05-25 14507, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        electronic keyboards, he means
      • 2006-05-25 14509, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        synths
      • 2006-05-25 14512, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        make/model#
      • 2006-05-25 14512, 2006

      • gecks
        yes thanks, but you can't do individual models. discogs you can do everything
      • 2006-05-25 14522, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i dont think we'd want that much info
      • 2006-05-25 14525, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        although they do need to be regrouped catmo
      • 2006-05-25 14548, 2006

      • Nyght
        They're referring to things like a Roland RX 7 or whatnot Joan
      • 2006-05-25 14551, 2006

      • mudcrow
        theres no such thing as too much info
      • 2006-05-25 14504, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        all the keyboards should be a subgrouping of keyboards
      • 2006-05-25 14507, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        well, we'd have to allow a free text entry field to get that much info
      • 2006-05-25 14513, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        because enumerating it would be pointless
      • 2006-05-25 14518, 2006

      • Joan_W
        hi beth
      • 2006-05-25 14521, 2006

      • gecks
      • 2006-05-25 14525, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i don't think we want to do either
      • 2006-05-25 14539, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        sub tracks is nice
      • 2006-05-25 14542, 2006

      • Nyght
        hey, thoiugh I've been here off and on
      • 2006-05-25 14544, 2006

      • gecks
        and needs to be rearranged somewhat oh well
      • 2006-05-25 14556, 2006

      • catmo
        wolfsong13: what do you mean?
      • 2006-05-25 14516, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        yes song parts are about the only thing redemable on discogs
      • 2006-05-25 14539, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        catmo according to the wiki page keyboards are split up
      • 2006-05-25 14549, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        is that page up to date?
      • 2006-05-25 14553, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i think the ability to create a collection and wantlist is pretty great
      • 2006-05-25 14553, 2006

      • catmo
        hmm.. the wikipage is a bit outofdate
      • 2006-05-25 14500, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        especially with the new marketplace type thing
      • 2006-05-25 14501, 2006

      • catmo
        what are you refering to. spesifically?
      • 2006-05-25 14503, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i haven't looked at the actual AR
      • 2006-05-25 14511, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        not that we'd want to do that, but i like it a lot
      • 2006-05-25 14512, 2006

      • gecks
        yeah i wouldn't want collection facility here...the data just isn't suited for it IMO
      • 2006-05-25 14552, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        ojnkpjg: i think we do want that actually
      • 2006-05-25 14500, 2006

      • catmo
        I want it!!!
      • 2006-05-25 14507, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        what for?
      • 2006-05-25 14520, 2006

      • mudcrow
        bragging rights :)
      • 2006-05-25 14521, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        song segments?
      • 2006-05-25 14523, 2006

      • nikki_
        gecks: it depends how much detail you want. personally I'm happy with something that matches the tracklisting.
      • 2006-05-25 14525, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        we can't distinguish between different media formats for the same releases
      • 2006-05-25 14531, 2006

      • nikki_
        mb can do that fine.
      • 2006-05-25 14549, 2006

      • tro has quit
      • 2006-05-25 14549, 2006

      • catmo
        but we will. in the future
      • 2006-05-25 14552, 2006

      • catmo
        afaik
      • 2006-05-25 14558, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        what do song segments have to do with collections?
      • 2006-05-25 14559, 2006

      • nikki_
        catmo: when you finish :P
      • 2006-05-25 14503, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i think we're talking about different things
      • 2006-05-25 14504, 2006

      • catmo
        :o
      • 2006-05-25 14505, 2006

      • gecks
        yeah thats what i want for the my tagging. and the way MBz changes the data to keep consistancy, i like that a lot for tagging
      • 2006-05-25 14515, 2006

      • warp
        can anyone suggest a tag editor for flac? (i'm on ubuntu)
      • 2006-05-25 14522, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        metaflac :P
      • 2006-05-25 14523, 2006

      • catmo
        next time I wont rent stuff for mlibrary. I'll work on that instead?
      • 2006-05-25 14526, 2006

      • nikki_
        metaflac
      • 2006-05-25 14534, 2006

      • catmo
        hmm
      • 2006-05-25 14541, 2006

      • nikki_ has never used anything else :)
      • 2006-05-25 14545, 2006

      • catmo
        whats the deal with cockroache's mods now?
      • 2006-05-25 14555, 2006

      • catmo
        someone going around and automodapproving them?
      • 2006-05-25 14514, 2006

      • warp always has to go in after picard and fix stuff
      • 2006-05-25 14515, 2006

      • warp
        :/
      • 2006-05-25 14524, 2006

      • nikki_
        warp: like?
      • 2006-05-25 14526, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        catmo: you have organs under wind instruments and , piano under struck and others under electriv
      • 2006-05-25 14537, 2006

      • catmo
        wolf: that was sone intentionally
      • 2006-05-25 14543, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        also i don't think i saw harpsichord (may have missed it)
      • 2006-05-25 14543, 2006

      • catmo
        I did alot of research o n that
      • 2006-05-25 14554, 2006

      • catmo
        harpsicord are under psaltery
      • 2006-05-25 14556, 2006

      • warp
        nikki_: in this particular case, it's a vinyl only release. I want track numbers A1,A2,B1,B2, instead of 1,2,3,4
      • 2006-05-25 14501, 2006

      • nikki_
        ah
      • 2006-05-25 14504, 2006

      • catmo
        these isntruemnts are wind and string instruments
      • 2006-05-25 14512, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        it's technically accurate but not generally logical
      • 2006-05-25 14524, 2006

      • catmo
        'keyboards' is an arbritray grouping elemnt
      • 2006-05-25 14529, 2006

      • catmo
        well
      • 2006-05-25 14529, 2006

      • Joan_W has quit
      • 2006-05-25 14530, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        most people don't know that pianos are technically percission
      • 2006-05-25 14537, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        which is good
      • 2006-05-25 14539, 2006

      • catmo
        but I have them understrings!
      • 2006-05-25 14542, 2006

      • warp
        nikki_: I also prefer just 1,2,3,4 instead of 1/4, 2/4, 3/4, 4/4 which picard has started doing.
      • 2006-05-25 14546, 2006

      • catmo
        most people lknow pianos have strings
      • 2006-05-25 14550, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        do people really not know that?
      • 2006-05-25 14501, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        but they are hammered instruments
      • 2006-05-25 14503, 2006

      • nikki_
        piano is piano to me
      • 2006-05-25 14511, 2006

      • catmo
        yes. but so is dulcimer
      • 2006-05-25 14514, 2006

      • nikki_
        it has its own category in nikki's brain.
      • 2006-05-25 14514, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        they are not played as other strings are played
      • 2006-05-25 14522, 2006

      • catmo
        it has tringa and flla into othe struck chordophone family
      • 2006-05-25 14526, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        understand but not my point anyway
      • 2006-05-25 14531, 2006

      • catmo
        I fid literally *hours* of researcho n this
      • 2006-05-25 14534, 2006

      • nikki_
        warp: ah. you can either downgrade or wait for this tagger script people keep talking about
      • 2006-05-25 14536, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        it should be where someone will look for it
      • 2006-05-25 14555, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        and in the case of keyboards some of them aren't easily found
      • 2006-05-25 14513, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        the search functionality does a really good job these days
      • 2006-05-25 14517, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        it used to be awful before we had that
      • 2006-05-25 14519, 2006

      • catmo
        nonone will look for it, that's' what the search function is for. noone has complained so far. and with an instrument as often and widly used as piano, there would have been
      • 2006-05-25 14525, 2006

      • catmo
        this sortign is for consistency
      • 2006-05-25 14526, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        also oboe and english horn are not the same
      • 2006-05-25 14537, 2006

      • gecks
        agreed search engine makes it much better :)
      • 2006-05-25 14545, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        english horn should not be a sub there
      • 2006-05-25 14556, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i used to have to remember how many times to hit page down for certain instruments
      • 2006-05-25 14521, 2006

      • catmo
        no offence. but until you spend 3 hours on wikipedia and 5 hours surfign there web and know things by hard. please do not berate me about this
      • 2006-05-25 14530, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        but are they using search because they can't find it in the tree?
      • 2006-05-25 14546, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        ummm well i don't think i need to
      • 2006-05-25 14546, 2006

      • catmo
        theyare using search because there is 100+ instruments
      • 2006-05-25 14552, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        my intuition is that most people use search first
      • 2006-05-25 14555, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i majored in music in college
      • 2006-05-25 14557, 2006

      • catmo
        jupp
      • 2006-05-25 14504, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        that's what i do, anyway
      • 2006-05-25 14504, 2006

      • nikki_
        wolfsong13: *I* use the search because I take one look at that huuuuuge list and think holy shit!
      • 2006-05-25 14512, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        if search doesn't work, i fallback to serching the tree
      • 2006-05-25 14515, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        then we should drop the tree bit entirely
      • 2006-05-25 14515, 2006

      • catmo
        well sorry, but I am going to take myown search and knowledge over yours
      • 2006-05-25 14532, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        well that's a bit sad isn't it?
      • 2006-05-25 14534, 2006

      • nikki_
        the list is *huge*. I can't be arsed to look in all those!
      • 2006-05-25 14543, 2006

      • nikki_ hated the search at first
      • 2006-05-25 14547, 2006

      • nikki_
        but now I can see why it's useful
      • 2006-05-25 14553, 2006

      • catmo
        stop complaining and come up with an alternative and push the envelope to have it implemnt it
      • 2006-05-25 14553, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        you're taking the word of some annonymous person
      • 2006-05-25 14557, 2006

      • mustaqila yawns and sharghles
      • 2006-05-25 14500, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i'm not complaining
      • 2006-05-25 14503, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i'm suggesting
      • 2006-05-25 14506, 2006

      • catmo
        yes you are
      • 2006-05-25 14511, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        yeah, enter a few classical albums and you'll develop a healthy hatred of the list
      • 2006-05-25 14513, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        without search
      • 2006-05-25 14513, 2006

      • nikki_ isn't complaining either
      • 2006-05-25 14523, 2006

      • catmo
        not talking to you nikki
      • 2006-05-25 14524, 2006

      • Shepard
        does anyone here care about myspace links?
      • 2006-05-25 14526, 2006

      • catmo
        :)
      • 2006-05-25 14526, 2006

      • nikki_
        ah good
      • 2006-05-25 14527, 2006

      • warp
        nikki_: oh, i currently just choose to live with it :) -- or if it's an album which doesn't have weird unicode, I sometimes go in afterwards and change them back.
      • 2006-05-25 14538, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        Shepard: not really
      • 2006-05-25 14546, 2006

      • Shepard
        because there seems to be a little style issue: http://musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=4878060
      • 2006-05-25 14559, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        catmo: don't be oversensitive
      • 2006-05-25 14507, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i'm only suggesting changes
      • 2006-05-25 14525, 2006

      • catmo
        I'm not being oversensitive, i'm giving 'standart coder repsonce to whining'
      • 2006-05-25 14525, 2006

      • gecks
        i almost added all the credits to a few trail of dead albums...ARs came a long way since i last checked. just need a way of doing track ranges and then they're pretty good, bar the process to add more instruments/roles :)
      • 2006-05-25 14532, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i personally don't think spliting them up when you have a tree is logical
      • 2006-05-25 14544, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        huh?
      • 2006-05-25 14553, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
      • 2006-05-25 14556, 2006

      • catmo
        aka: where you syour alternate treeless wkipage for the instruments tree
      • 2006-05-25 14517, 2006

      • nikki_
        I can't think of a better way of doing it, the list is huge and nothing is going to make it quick to navigate by hand
      • 2006-05-25 14535, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        why introduce a whole different document when we can build on all the work you've done?
      • 2006-05-25 14540, 2006

      • Shepard
        who wanted those links again? :)
      • 2006-05-25 14541, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        that's not logical either
      • 2006-05-25 14544, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        not me
      • 2006-05-25 14502, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i don't really care either way about the myspace stuff
      • 2006-05-25 14504, 2006

      • nikki_
        me, to stop people from adding them as everything under the sun
      • 2006-05-25 14504, 2006

      • micr0c0sm joined the channel
      • 2006-05-25 14508, 2006

      • nikki_
        but that's about it
      • 2006-05-25 14552, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        maybe we can steal pagerank from google to decide when a link is worth adding if it's not official
      • 2006-05-25 14558, 2006

      • gecks
        im not sure of the technicalities of it but i still think it would be better to have an annotation field for every instrument AR, so you could say "Guitar [Gibson SG]" without having to create a new instrument AR
      • 2006-05-25 14513, 2006

      • catmo
        perhaps
      • 2006-05-25 14536, 2006

      • catmo
        if you need a new instruments, just give's a ticet on mb.org/bugs btw