#musicbrainz

/

      • Nyght
        nechto13: the language will throw me right off... do you have anything in English? I'm pulling things that most can be checked with on IMDB or are at least our common language./
      • 2006-05-12 13224, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        but the way it will change impacts how we should make changes today and we don't' know how it will change
      • 2006-05-12 13247, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        as ruaok has said the NGS still needs to be hammered out
      • 2006-05-12 13206, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        we need to look at this a lil closer
      • 2006-05-12 13230, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        there are inarguably a lot of problems in the db today
      • 2006-05-12 13242, 2006

      • Nyght
        okay, but I can spend all night showing you soundtracks that don't follow soundtrack guide.. because it's not "natural" to list composer... and support this, or you can start digging yourself.. this is broken... it's working against "natural choice"... and yet, my idea is worse? I could care less if the composer is known in truth.. I would rather it be all performing artist, but it seemed that it was composer
      • 2006-05-12 13246, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        they will all need fixing one way or another
      • 2006-05-12 13250, 2006

      • Nyght
        for some reason... one I don't even know why.
      • 2006-05-12 13259, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        well step back a second
      • 2006-05-12 13201, 2006

      • Nyght
        and yet, my idea is worse? I could care less if the composer is known in truth.. I would rather it be all performing artist, but it seemed that it was composer
      • 2006-05-12 13220, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        the last time i checked it was still proposed unless that's changed
      • 2006-05-12 13229, 2006

      • nechto13
        and this is a popular musical we are talking about. i could name a couple of ones that weren't as popular and good luck finding performers for them. either way for some releases it will be a lot easier finding performers than composers and on other ones it would be vice versa
      • 2006-05-12 13234, 2006

      • nechto13
      • 2006-05-12 13235, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        and even if it's official i think what you're proposing to change it to has some loops to close
      • 2006-05-12 13209, 2006

      • nechto13
        Nyght: i don't doubt that there are Disney tracks some credited to performers some to composers. i've seen it myself. but you said it yourself about that it's easier to find performers than composers so you check if it's the artist who performed it on a soundtrack then it should be a composer and if it's not than it's a cover. seems simple enough, unless i'm not getting something
      • 2006-05-12 13224, 2006

      • MrQwerty joined the channel
      • 2006-05-12 13232, 2006

      • Nyght
        well honestly nechto13, you're out of my language expertise, so I have no chance to find the performers... that's why I hate the japanese files so much.. I can't read it, or write it.
      • 2006-05-12 13236, 2006

      • Nyght
        therefore I can't search for it.
      • 2006-05-12 13226, 2006

      • Nyght
        Great, it's got some loops.. let's figure those loops out wolfsong, and make it better. It's a proposal, because what we're doing doesn't seem to be working out for the database, as you can tell by digging up those multiple albums that don't follow guidelines
      • 2006-05-12 13243, 2006

      • Nyght
        and, I don't feel we should search them all down, because there's nothing stating this is going to be how it's dealt with in the future.
      • 2006-05-12 13237, 2006

      • nechto13
        Nyght: this is another sticking point for me that maybe it wouldn't be that difficult for soundtracks in english but anything that was released in other languages would be very difficult to find performer-wise
      • 2006-05-12 13241, 2006

      • Nyght
        feat. or not feat., seems trivial.. yes, eventually that will be changed too... but, that's a handful, we're talking something that is released in droves every year.. coming in and needing an editor to correct each one, unless someone experieneced with the guidelines put it in in the first place.
      • 2006-05-12 13251, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        Nyght: are you making a new proposal because the current one isn't being followed or are you saying that the current proposal is broken in some way? is the current proposal viable? can it be reworked?
      • 2006-05-12 13232, 2006

      • Nyght
        nechto, put the name of the film in quotes in russian, and then spell out soundtrack in russian, see if you don't find your artists.
      • 2006-05-12 13206, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        all the problems are there because there because we've never had a rule for soundtracks
      • 2006-05-12 13228, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        at all
      • 2006-05-12 13228, 2006

      • Nyght
        the current proposal in my opinion is very backwords to what comes naturally for people to do when inputting a soundtrack. Therefore broken, badly broken.
      • 2006-05-12 13259, 2006

      • Nyght
        it moves soundtracks from "album/release status" to the same position classical is.
      • 2006-05-12 13211, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i haven't read it recently for comments but i have to disagree
      • 2006-05-12 13212, 2006

      • Nyght
        I wont put in a classical album.. because I don't know how to.. because it's too difficult.
      • 2006-05-12 13228, 2006

      • nechto13
        Nyght: i know how to search for soundtracks in russian. the fact of the matter is most of the information about soviet releases for instance is still not there in that detail
      • 2006-05-12 13240, 2006

      • Nyght
        they are for French..
      • 2006-05-12 13248, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        a lot of things aren't naturally the way people would expect them in mb which is why we document the sg itself
      • 2006-05-12 13258, 2006

      • Nyght
        they are for German, I'm sorry, Russian and Japanese are beyond my comprehension nechto13
      • 2006-05-12 13228, 2006

      • nechto13
        Nyght: also you put it in quotes you won't get any hits. without quotes you at least have a chance. and not always either
      • 2006-05-12 13243, 2006

      • Nyght
        and you think it's better for every classical album to need to go through an editor, or not come in at all because the guidelines are too much to swallow wolfsong13?
      • 2006-05-12 13205, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i don't think they are that much
      • 2006-05-12 13211, 2006

      • Nyght
        I got three pages worth of google hits nechto13
      • 2006-05-12 13218, 2006

      • Nyght
        but, that was english... :shrugs:
      • 2006-05-12 13221, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        and there's only one aspect of the csg being applied to soundtracks
      • 2006-05-12 13243, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        and that's who the album artist should be
      • 2006-05-12 13255, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        that's pretty straight forward
      • 2006-05-12 13256, 2006

      • nechto13
        Nyght: like i said that was a popular soundtrack. i haven't tried to put in anything obscure in MB
      • 2006-05-12 13226, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        then there are a couple of exceptions i would say make along the way which have actually been made easier by SG5DR
      • 2006-05-12 13237, 2006

      • Nyght
        do me a favor, wolfsong13, step out of your currently known name... make another name, start making moderations that aren't up to style specs.. you'll see the frustration, especially if you move out of genre as well. (ie: go to punk, rock, gothic, classical, etc.) there are helpful moderators, and it's gotten much better.. but,
      • 2006-05-12 13206, 2006

      • Nyght
        there's still a lot of negative impact for a new unknown editor.. and no, I wont even try classical, because it's too daunting.
      • 2006-05-12 13246, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        no argument there
      • 2006-05-12 13213, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        but i think the solution to that problem are the other items you're looking at
      • 2006-05-12 13238, 2006

      • Nyght
        now, take that same general "idea" and come in, without knowing the style guideline, and here you have Top Gun... it's a soundtrack, composer? Is that on liner notes?
      • 2006-05-12 13242, 2006

      • Nyght
        I can get them and find out... ;)
      • 2006-05-12 13259, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        the newbie frustration is "what are these rules you keep bringing up?" and "why do i have to hunt them down?"
      • 2006-05-12 13237, 2006

      • nechto13
        Nyght: people who put in releases that don't follow guidelines do so not because they know that guidelines are out there, but too complex. but because they haven't read them. i can't speek for most, but there are some who are not interested in following guidelines
      • 2006-05-12 13237, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        we have to get the rules in front of the user where they need to apply them
      • 2006-05-12 13248, 2006

      • Nyght
        and nechto13, I would never put this much work into finding out who the disney composer was.. the disney, the rest of the soundtracks, would go in the stack of classical
      • 2006-05-12 13218, 2006

      • Nyght
        because, the artists are on the liner notes, the composer.... isn't natural for what is shown as the norm for putting in soundtracks in the db itself.
      • 2006-05-12 13219, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        if we want good data we can't expect that someone will not get frustrated doing a 1001 searches because we hung in there and did it even though we were frustrated
      • 2006-05-12 13259, 2006

      • Nyght
        That right there wolfsong, is why I say the soundtrack guideline is broken... and too hard on new users.
      • 2006-05-12 13215, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        and if the composer isn't known btw that's covered in the sg already
      • 2006-05-12 13257, 2006

      • Nyght lifts brow and opens up the soundtrack guideline yet once more
      • 2006-05-12 13259, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        uhhh i'm lost
      • 2006-05-12 13221, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        maybe you're not following what i mean
      • 2006-05-12 13249, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        imagine the edit page for a second
      • 2006-05-12 13218, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i'm talking about putting the content of the wiki on that page (in cleaner version)
      • 2006-05-12 13227, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        that's what i'm saying will help newbies
      • 2006-05-12 13228, 2006

      • nechto13
        Nyght: i haven't met a newbie who told me that they don't undersdtand the guideline after i asked them to read it. but it's possible it needs rewriting, that doesn't mean that it should be abandoned
      • 2006-05-12 13231, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        on screen help
      • 2006-05-12 13238, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        not help you go search for
      • 2006-05-12 13200, 2006

      • Nyght
        For pre-existing classical music used on soundtracks, Artist should contain the composer in accordance with the ClassicalStyleGuide. For pre-existing non-classical music, Artist should contain the performers. (There's pre-existing..)
      • 2006-05-12 13205, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        that doesn't have anything to do with what you're saying is broken in the current proposal at all
      • 2006-05-12 13239, 2006

      • Nyght
        Where performer information is available, it should be indicated using AdvancedRelationships. Such music is often referred to as the "score" - especially if it is instrumental.
      • 2006-05-12 13249, 2006

      • Nyght
        there's attributing performers via AR
      • 2006-05-12 13258, 2006

      • Nyght
        but, I don't see anything that says, it the composer is unknown do this..
      • 2006-05-12 13218, 2006

      • Nyght
        wolfsong13: if we want good data we can't expect that someone will not get frustrated doing a 1001 searches because we hung in there and did it even though we were frustrated
      • 2006-05-12 13228, 2006

      • Nyght
        That, is exactly why I say composer is a bad idea....
      • 2006-05-12 13235, 2006

      • Nyght
        your comment right there.
      • 2006-05-12 13241, 2006

      • nechto13
        Nyght: i actually didn't know that there were guidelines and had to ask for links when i joined irc when i was a newbie since i didn't know how to find them either
      • 2006-05-12 13245, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        composer = artist in this case yes?
      • 2006-05-12 13242, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        Nyght: we're talking about separate things
      • 2006-05-12 13258, 2006

      • Nyght is going to have to step back, because obviously there's miscommunications here
      • 2006-05-12 13225, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        you're proposing the content of the guideline be changed for clarity
      • 2006-05-12 13244, 2006

      • Nyght
        the current guideline, to my thinking, the way the majority of the database is currently, shows the current guideline goes against what people would normally do...
      • 2006-05-12 13255, 2006

      • Nyght
        therefore it is broken.
      • 2006-05-12 13258, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i'm saying that no matter what the content is if users don't know the content existts it's worthless to them
      • 2006-05-12 13209, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i'm saying change the presentation of the guidelines
      • 2006-05-12 13246, 2006

      • wolfsong13 does
      • 2006-05-12 13206, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        the point is if i don't know the rules i can't use them
      • 2006-05-12 13211, 2006

      • nechto13
        maybe type of release should be entered first and relevant guidelines would be presented to the user on the album add page?
      • 2006-05-12 13211, 2006

      • Nyght
        I don't see anywhere in the soundtrack guideline where it says, if you can't find composer.. or anything else. I see cases of pre-existing information. But, the opposite (ie: This very popular disney song "a whole new world" (or whatever pet name you want pet song) has been released on dozens of VA's is "post" soundtrack, therefore should be changed to composer.)
      • 2006-05-12 13222, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        it doesn't matter what the rules say at that point
      • 2006-05-12 13256, 2006

      • Nyght
        if a song was covered/remixed it breaks soundtrack guidelines. (I don't see that in the soundtrack guidelines, but I've heard of it.)
      • 2006-05-12 13208, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        nechto13: the help system i'm proposing occurs every step of the way not at x point
      • 2006-05-12 13229, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        Nyght: plz answer my earlier question
      • 2006-05-12 13234, 2006

      • Nyght
        (*holiday music should go by composer) again, it's no where I have found in the guidelines... there's a lot that seems to be followed and not in the guidelines.. but, step back from that.. are we talking "my idea" or current guideline?
      • 2006-05-12 13240, 2006

      • nechto13
        wolfsong13: i see. i'm guessing i missed that part
      • 2006-05-12 13250, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        does composer = artist as described in the current proposal?
      • 2006-05-12 13207, 2006

      • Nyght
        I agree to this wolfsong13: i'm saying that no matter what the content is if users don't know the content existts it's worthless to them
      • 2006-05-12 13218, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        great
      • 2006-05-12 13252, 2006

      • Nyght
        If this was the case "nechto13: maybe type of release should be entered first and relevant guidelines would be presented to the user on the album add page?" I wouldn't even have entered a single soundtrack, because it's not worth it to me to look up the composer.
      • 2006-05-12 13204, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        can you also agree that if a user sees PropsedStyle, not Official they are more than likely not going to use it?
      • 2006-05-12 13214, 2006

      • Nyght
        Why not? "wolfsong13: it doesn't matter what the rules say at that point"
      • 2006-05-12 13229, 2006

      • Nyght
        Which question? "wolfsong13: Nyght: plz answer my earlier question"
      • 2006-05-12 13257, 2006

      • Nyght
        I like this idea "wolfsong13: nechto13: the help system i'm proposing occurs every step of the way not at x point"
      • 2006-05-12 13210, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        [12:18] wolfsong13: does composer = artist as described in the current proposal?
      • 2006-05-12 13219, 2006

      • Nyght
        in my current proposal?
      • 2006-05-12 13240, 2006

      • Nyght
        wait.. composer in my mind never equals artist.
      • 2006-05-12 13244, 2006

      • Nyght
        They are composer.. period.
      • 2006-05-12 13246, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        no the one in the wiki that you're saying is broken
      • 2006-05-12 13255, 2006

      • Nyght
        composer can be lyricist, and composer, but they are the writers
      • 2006-05-12 13258, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i'm talking about what it says
      • 2006-05-12 13206, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        not what you're thinking
      • 2006-05-12 13227, 2006

      • Nyght
        For music written for the soundtrack, Artist should contain the composer, not the performer. Where performer information is available, it should be indicated using AdvancedRelationships. Such music is often referred to as the "score" - especially if it is instrumental.
      • 2006-05-12 13241, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        right the Artist field
      • 2006-05-12 13257, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        that's what equals Composer right?
      • 2006-05-12 13204, 2006

      • Shepard yawns
      • 2006-05-12 13213, 2006

      • wolfsong13 tickles sheppy
      • 2006-05-12 13229, 2006

      • Shepard
        eek please not so early in the morning
      • 2006-05-12 13236, 2006

      • Nyght
        in current style guideline artist=composer
      • 2006-05-12 13224, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        ok so in that case the logic, although arguably too assumed and undocumented would be to use http://musicbrainz.org/style.html#styleguide-unkn…
      • 2006-05-12 13241, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        so in that case it's actually covered
      • 2006-05-12 13215, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        this is why i say genre specific styles are quite dangerous and weedy
      • 2006-05-12 13247, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        the general SG should overshadow all genre specific items
      • 2006-05-12 13207, 2006

      • Nyght
        but, you could easily have artists in that situation, so, unknown is better than factual artist.
      • 2006-05-12 13214, 2006

      • Nyght
        just a point, sorry I am interrupting you.
      • 2006-05-12 13222, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        so genre specific should work as much in concert with something that exists as possible
      • 2006-05-12 13249, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        errr meaning the performer or composer?
      • 2006-05-12 13256, 2006

      • Nyght
        performer, I'm sorry
      • 2006-05-12 13251, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        so if the entire soundtrack was written by an uncredited performer who are you saying the AlbumArtist would be if all the tracks are by different performers?
      • 2006-05-12 13223, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        and one more cavet
      • 2006-05-12 13252, 2006

      • Nyght
        you have that same situation as it stands right now, I don't see how that justifies keeping something that currently is about 75 % of what the database isn't
      • 2006-05-12 13259, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        the rule should hold to compilations
      • 2006-05-12 13204, 2006

      • nechto13
        Nyght: i don't know about you, but i'm hoping that when someone is putting a soundtrack or a classical release in MB and they don't know the composer then someone will have to fill in the blanks. i've seen people do blind imports from freedb and somehow that doesn't stir up as much debate about lack of additional information
      • 2006-05-12 13217, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        the performer stays the TrackArtist
      • 2006-05-12 13246, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        so when we talk about all those Disney hits albums the TrackArtist should not be the composer
      • 2006-05-12 13208, 2006

      • Nyght
        then that needs to be clarified in the soundtrack guideline.
      • 2006-05-12 13225, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        feel free to add it
      • 2006-05-12 13234, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        it's only a proposal
      • 2006-05-12 13247, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        but i don't think the proposal is broken as you said
      • 2006-05-12 13258, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        i think it may need tweaking
      • 2006-05-12 13210, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        and it probably hasn't been updated in light of SG5DR either
      • 2006-05-12 13210, 2006

      • Nyght
        you're correct.. it is only a proposal http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/SoundtrackStyle?highl… <--this one.
      • 2006-05-12 13227, 2006

      • Nyght
        but, it's being followed like it was a hard fast rule. People are voting no for performers in artist field.
      • 2006-05-12 13251, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        that's a whole separate problem
      • 2006-05-12 13203, 2006

      • Nyght
        and I can't get behind tweaking it, because in my mind it's already so broken.. because you can tell by a database search it's not natural.
      • 2006-05-12 13225, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        and it can't be fixed with another proposal
      • 2006-05-12 13206, 2006

      • Nyght
        well... then consider the proposal I had, a second proposal? Or, in my personal preference.. it would be all performers, and in the instance performers can't be found, then composer of the track.
      • 2006-05-12 13211, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        it can be fixed by tightening up the existing proposal and getting it official and pointing out in mod notes now that it is only proposed at this time
      • 2006-05-12 13235, 2006

      • Nyght
        because if I edit it, it will change drastically, and I don't want to do that.. I wanted to try and get some middle ground to what was being accepted already.
      • 2006-05-12 13236, 2006

      • nechto13
        Nyght: i think you come to the conclusion that it's broken because you spent too much time on Disney ;)
      • 2006-05-12 13238, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        but either way the votes fall where they may until something is offifical and nothing ever has been
      • 2006-05-12 13208, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        Nyght: i'll make a deal with you