#musicbrainz

/

      • yllona
        that album tracks are all correctly named
      • 2006-08-11 22310, 2006

      • nightgroove
        I mean, since its telonius monk, should it not be on him and with ar's to the orchestra, ifr classical stlyeguidelines?
      • 2006-08-11 22311, 2006

      • yllona
        those are all thelonious monk tunes, and correctly spelled
      • 2006-08-11 22342, 2006

      • yllona
        yes. i agree. i wanted to cheeck the track listings first
      • 2006-08-11 22347, 2006

      • nightgroove
        ahh
      • 2006-08-11 22349, 2006

      • nightgroove
        good show
      • 2006-08-11 22301, 2006

      • yllona
        it should be listed under monk, with Ar's to the orchestra and conductor
      • 2006-08-11 22303, 2006

      • toxickore has quit
      • 2006-08-11 22307, 2006

      • nightgroove
        that's what I thought
      • 2006-08-11 22321, 2006

      • nightgroove
        thank you so much for the help :D
      • 2006-08-11 22325, 2006

      • sidd has quit
      • 2006-08-11 22329, 2006

      • yllona
        your welcome!
      • 2006-08-11 22345, 2006

      • yllona
        *you're
      • 2006-08-11 22311, 2006

      • nightgroove
        I'm kinda really busy right now, trying to keep my mind in order for bug testing, would you be so kind as to fix7tell the moderator/etc this?
      • 2006-08-11 22343, 2006

      • nightgroove
        s/7///
      • 2006-08-11 22303, 2006

      • yllona
        you mean add a mod note with instructions?
      • 2006-08-11 22320, 2006

      • nightgroove
        yes
      • 2006-08-11 22341, 2006

      • nightgroove
        (and also make sure that its followed, follow it up as it where9
      • 2006-08-11 22350, 2006

      • nightgroove
        if you have the time and inclination that is :)
      • 2006-08-11 22312, 2006

      • yllona
        sure thing, the mod harveydrone has always been cooperative in the past
      • 2006-08-11 22318, 2006

      • nightgroove
        sweet
      • 2006-08-11 22321, 2006

      • nightgroove
        thanks again :)
      • 2006-08-11 22348, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        mo s/7/\// :)
      • 2006-08-11 22355, 2006

      • yllona
        no problem, i'll book mark. and follow up as son as i'm off-the clock ;)
      • 2006-08-11 22301, 2006

      • yllona
        *soon as
      • 2006-08-11 22302, 2006

      • nightgroove
        thank you1 I was just about to ask how to replace character with /
      • 2006-08-11 22323, 2006

      • nightgroove
        figured to escape with \
      • 2006-08-11 22331, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        yup
      • 2006-08-11 22337, 2006

      • sidd joined the channel
      • 2006-08-11 22350, 2006

      • nightgroove
        ehhmm
      • 2006-08-11 22318, 2006

      • nightgroove
        does anyone else have this issue on test that suddenly all the voting buttons are not side by side but under eachother? it doesn't happen on all mods
      • 2006-08-11 22340, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        yeah, I opened a bug for it earlier
      • 2006-08-11 22300, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        it's appears to be on ones without the approve link
      • 2006-08-11 22305, 2006

      • nightgroove
        oh great, then i don't have too
      • 2006-08-11 22336, 2006

      • nightgroove
        hmm
      • 2006-08-11 22343, 2006

      • nightgroove
        my approve links has gone awol
      • 2006-08-11 22304, 2006

      • nightgroove rereaeds
      • 2006-08-11 22309, 2006

      • nightgroove
        erh you said 'witouth'
      • 2006-08-11 22311, 2006

      • nightgroove
        duurr
      • 2006-08-11 22329, 2006

      • inhouseuk
      • 2006-08-11 22348, 2006

      • nightgroove
        thanks :)
      • 2006-08-11 22302, 2006

      • sidd_ has quit
      • 2006-08-11 22306, 2006

      • nightgroove cc's
      • 2006-08-11 22345, 2006

      • sidd_ joined the channel
      • 2006-08-11 22316, 2006

      • nightgroove
        is there a bug/rfe for 'hide trackAR-links on releaseview toggle'?
      • 2006-08-11 22326, 2006

      • nightgroove
      • 2006-08-11 22329, 2006

      • nightgroove
        its hard to see
      • 2006-08-11 22341, 2006

      • nightgroove
        which reminds me
      • 2006-08-11 22330, 2006

      • Shepard
        yes there is
      • 2006-08-11 22357, 2006

      • Shepard
      • 2006-08-11 22304, 2006

      • sidd__ joined the channel
      • 2006-08-11 22327, 2006

      • BrianG joined the channel
      • 2006-08-11 22347, 2006

      • sidd_ has quit
      • 2006-08-11 22341, 2006

      • ruaok
        ok, looks like vote history searches.
      • 2006-08-11 22349, 2006

      • ruaok
        not surprsing, really.
      • 2006-08-11 22350, 2006

      • sidd has quit
      • 2006-08-11 22306, 2006

      • ruaok
        ok, another server bounce coming up as I turn off some unneeded logging.
      • 2006-08-11 22327, 2006

      • Shepard
        vote archiving needed, eh?
      • 2006-08-11 22336, 2006

      • Shepard
        err edit
      • 2006-08-11 22309, 2006

      • ruaok
        badly, yes.
      • 2006-08-11 22318, 2006

      • ruaok
        but everytime I suggest it everyone screams.
      • 2006-08-11 22344, 2006

      • ruaok
        soon we will have more edit/vote data than actual data.
      • 2006-08-11 22344, 2006

      • nightgroove
        as long as they're not deleted the old mods, I don't have a proble mwith it
      • 2006-08-11 22347, 2006

      • ruaok
        if not already.
      • 2006-08-11 22302, 2006

      • ruaok
        that's exactly what I am talking about.
      • 2006-08-11 22303, 2006

      • nightgroove
        archiving is a-ok with me
      • 2006-08-11 22332, 2006

      • ruaok
        archiving == deleting
      • 2006-08-11 22338, 2006

      • nightgroove
        erh
      • 2006-08-11 22357, 2006

      • nightgroove
        sorry, logic error
      • 2006-08-11 22300, 2006

      • nightgroove
        what?
      • 2006-08-11 22312, 2006

      • nightgroove
        how is archiving deleting?
      • 2006-08-11 22313, 2006

      • ruaok
        delete from moderation_closed;
      • 2006-08-11 22322, 2006

      • ruaok
        delete from vote_closed;
      • 2006-08-11 22333, 2006

      • nightgroove
        ...
      • 2006-08-11 22347, 2006

      • nightgroove
        but then stored smewhere else in case someone needs the info?
      • 2006-08-11 22355, 2006

      • Shepard
        the old mod data is really needed. but if you put it to some other server and exclude it from the normal searches and add a link "search in archives" then I'm fine with it
      • 2006-08-11 22303, 2006

      • nightgroove
        yes
      • 2006-08-11 22321, 2006

      • ruaok heards NGS slipping into neverland
      • 2006-08-11 22324, 2006

      • nightgroove
        2-3 year old data isn't needed in your day-to-day mod searches
      • 2006-08-11 22337, 2006

      • nightgroove
        what is ngs?
      • 2006-08-11 22344, 2006

      • nikki_
        next generation schema
      • 2006-08-11 22345, 2006

      • nightgroove
        new.. something schema?
      • 2006-08-11 22348, 2006

      • nightgroove
        oj
      • 2006-08-11 22351, 2006

      • nightgroove
        oh even
      • 2006-08-11 22323, 2006

      • nikki_
        hmmmm.
      • 2006-08-11 22331, 2006

      • nikki_
        I would at least archive them in one of those tar.bz2 thingies like you download to import the db, like closedmoderations-archive2000.tar.gz or something, which never gets changed
      • 2006-08-11 22358, 2006

      • nikki_
        even if you do actually delete them from the main server
      • 2006-08-11 22303, 2006

      • nightgroove
        :/
      • 2006-08-11 22318, 2006

      • nikki_
        then there's nothing to stop someone setting up something for finding really old edits...
      • 2006-08-11 22348, 2006

      • ruaok agrees with that.
      • 2006-08-11 22300, 2006

      • ruaok
        I'm still waiting for teleGUISE to setup a server.
      • 2006-08-11 22313, 2006

      • nightgroove
        ruaok: 3-4-5 years into othe future, we're going to be i n the possition that when the current day mods are being 'archived', we lose a lot of discussions and simmilar that has made guidelies and releases what they are, so when a new moderator/old one who forgot about the issue/wasn't there/etc sees the results, there will be no 'written' trails as to how it made it soo
      • 2006-08-11 22332, 2006

      • ruaok
        I think it would only be a few hours of work to make a new mb_server type
      • 2006-08-11 22345, 2006

      • nightgroove
        3-4 years agom nobody really made a lot of modnotes, since they wheren't mailed at all
      • 2006-08-11 22347, 2006

      • ruaok
        nightgroove: I understand fully. This is our history and we should preserve it.
      • 2006-08-11 22354, 2006

      • nightgroove
        exactly!
      • 2006-08-11 22328, 2006

      • ruaok
        problem is, if we can't, do we let the server slow to a crawl and become unusable becasue we want to save our history?
      • 2006-08-11 22341, 2006

      • nightgroove
        that's the reason I'd like to be able to search/ archive it, I don't mind if it's removed for m the live server though ,it should probably lift up space, and hench make things faster
      • 2006-08-11 22306, 2006

      • nightgroove
        we need a separate machine(s) t ostore it
      • 2006-08-11 22339, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        ruaok: what about deleting closed moderations and votes against objects that no longer exist in the db? or has that already been done?
      • 2006-08-11 22352, 2006

      • nightgroove
        oohh
      • 2006-08-11 22357, 2006

      • nightgroove
        that should be interesting
      • 2006-08-11 22308, 2006

      • nightgroove
        although they'd be attached to a moderators history
      • 2006-08-11 22333, 2006

      • nightgroove
        but should have less 'historical' value :p
      • 2006-08-11 22345, 2006

      • ruaok
        inhouseuk: I think that would have diminishing returns.
      • 2006-08-11 22304, 2006

      • nightgroove
        what does tham mean?
      • 2006-08-11 22304, 2006

      • ruaok
        I think creating an archive package that has all the things older than 2 years would work better.
      • 2006-08-11 22315, 2006

      • ruaok
        lot of work for not much result.
      • 2006-08-11 22321, 2006

      • nightgroove
        oohhok
      • 2006-08-11 22353, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        yes, that would be better
      • 2006-08-11 22348, 2006

      • BrianG
        if correct information eventually gets locked, than edit history wont matter, will it?
      • 2006-08-11 22333, 2006

      • BrianG
        i mean to have on the site readily accessable
      • 2006-08-11 22326, 2006

      • dseomn has quit
      • 2006-08-11 22346, 2006

      • toxickore joined the channel
      • 2006-08-11 22309, 2006

      • nightgroove breathes a sigh of relief
      • 2006-08-11 22325, 2006

      • nightgroove
        I finally submitted the bug of doom ™
      • 2006-08-11 22318, 2006

      • slaad joined the channel
      • 2006-08-11 22358, 2006

      • nightgroove
        wow I feel so relived
      • 2006-08-11 22319, 2006

      • nightgroove
        it's out of my hands now, heh i thin kthats' the biggest peace of text I ever wrote here
      • 2006-08-11 22324, 2006

      • Kerensky97
        What's the bug of Doom?
      • 2006-08-11 22335, 2006

      • nightgroove
        change track artist stuff
      • 2006-08-11 22354, 2006

      • Kerensky97
        Oh.
      • 2006-08-11 22318, 2006

      • nightgroove
        I've added 7 bugs now
      • 2006-08-11 22327, 2006

      • nightgroove
        but now I can't be arshed to do anymore today
      • 2006-08-11 22330, 2006

      • nightgroove
        may e tomorrow
      • 2006-08-11 22304, 2006

      • toxickore has quit
      • 2006-08-11 22306, 2006

      • ruaok has quit
      • 2006-08-11 22356, 2006

      • Muz mooses mo
      • 2006-08-11 22302, 2006

      • nightgroove
        hei hei
      • 2006-08-11 22305, 2006

      • Muz
        Hey
      • 2006-08-11 22307, 2006

      • Muz
        Got your PM : P
      • 2006-08-11 22318, 2006

      • Muz
        Just got home from a night of crazy whiskey related fun
      • 2006-08-11 22335, 2006

      • nightgroove gir muz mange elger
      • 2006-08-11 22343, 2006

      • nightgroove
        ikke mange elgen
      • 2006-08-11 22344, 2006

      • Muz
        :D:D:D
      • 2006-08-11 22345, 2006

      • nightgroove
        :p
      • 2006-08-11 22334, 2006

      • snarlydwarf has quit
      • 2006-08-11 22345, 2006

      • Muz devours dinner
      • 2006-08-11 22350, 2006

      • nightgroove
        hmm dinner
      • 2006-08-11 22356, 2006

      • nightgroove
        at 01:26 oO
      • 2006-08-11 22306, 2006

      • nightgroove
        you're an hour off a me but still
      • 2006-08-11 22319, 2006

      • Muz
        Yeah, well I did just get home..
      • 2006-08-11 22323, 2006

      • nightgroove
        dakar
      • 2006-08-11 22328, 2006

      • Muz
        :3
      • 2006-08-11 22339, 2006

      • Muz
        Save your dakar for the hangover :(
      • 2006-08-11 22344, 2006

      • nightgroove
        :(
      • 2006-08-11 22349, 2006

      • Muz hopes there isn't one, but the slim chance still exists
      • 2006-08-11 22306, 2006

      • Muz isn't prone to hangovers
      • 2006-08-11 22311, 2006

      • nightgroove
        usj
      • 2006-08-11 22335, 2006

      • andreablu joined the channel