"slaad Hrm... what's the story with "featuring" titles? Should I get rid of them if the track listing doesn't use them?" <-- yes, use ar's instead. only add 'feat' for when its actually in the title
2006-08-04 21611, 2006
bokmo
nikki: cool!
2006-08-04 21615, 2006
Shepard
hi mo
2006-08-04 21620, 2006
bokmo
hi shep§!
2006-08-04 21625, 2006
bokmo
-§
2006-08-04 21652, 2006
ngw has quit
2006-08-04 21651, 2006
Shepard` joined the channel
2006-08-04 21610, 2006
Shepard has quit
2006-08-04 21610, 2006
Shepard`
Shepard` is now known as Shepard
2006-08-04 21614, 2006
AMurderofCrows joined the channel
2006-08-04 21615, 2006
inhouseuk
mo where in the styleguides does it say "only add 'feat' for when its actually in the title"?
2006-08-04 21623, 2006
mudcrow has quit
2006-08-04 21659, 2006
bokmo
afaik its comon consensus
2006-08-04 21659, 2006
bokmo
especually now that a) we have disaster releafe to put both artistnames in the artistfield. b) can show the ar's o n the release view, and c) taggerscript is just around the corner
2006-08-04 21630, 2006
bokmo
'feat' that is not in the tracklist should not be there
2006-08-04 21655, 2006
bokmo
however 'feat' or 'featuring' *in* the tracklist/artist whatehaveyo, should defintily stay
2006-08-04 21632, 2006
Shepard
agreed, it is an artistic expression that does not completely overlap with the ARs
2006-08-04 21645, 2006
bokmo
yes
2006-08-04 21601, 2006
inhouseuk
the view of AR's in the track list should not change the styleguide
2006-08-04 21601, 2006
bokmo
how is releafe spelled?
2006-08-04 21610, 2006
Shepard
relief
2006-08-04 21615, 2006
bokmo
thanks
2006-08-04 21636, 2006
bokmo
I think you've forgotten why that styleguidelien was made in the first place
I don't see the point in adding stuff to the track name as feat. if it's not even credited like that
2006-08-04 21651, 2006
bokmo
exactly
2006-08-04 21603, 2006
bokmo
but as strongly *keep it* if it *is* in the credit like that
2006-08-04 21609, 2006
bokmo
hi nikki
2006-08-04 21644, 2006
nikki_
"ooh look, Mr Obscure is mentioned as hitting a drum in tiny text in the depths of the liner notes for this track, I better make sure it's in the track name" just doesn't work
2006-08-04 21653, 2006
bokmo
but now io must shower before i faint
2006-08-04 21620, 2006
bokmo o O ( will faint in the shower instead? oO )
2006-08-04 21634, 2006
nikki_
:o
2006-08-04 21638, 2006
nikki_
please don't!
2006-08-04 21650, 2006
bokmo
I like Mr Obscure, he's a distant cousin of mine
2006-08-04 21654, 2006
bokmo
hmm
2006-08-04 21605, 2006
bokmo
bokmo is now known as Mr_Obscure
2006-08-04 21617, 2006
nikki_
now he IS you! :o
2006-08-04 21621, 2006
Mr_Obscure
ja!
2006-08-04 21627, 2006
Mr_Obscure
and whatelse
2006-08-04 21633, 2006
Mr_Obscure
its not registred
2006-08-04 21634, 2006
Mr_Obscure
:D
2006-08-04 21652, 2006
Mr_Obscure
well it *wasn't*
2006-08-04 21654, 2006
Mr_Obscure
it is now
2006-08-04 21657, 2006
Mr_Obscure
>D
2006-08-04 21616, 2006
Mr_Obscure
Mr_Obscure is now known as nightgroove
2006-08-04 21629, 2006
nightgroove is now known as Mr_Obscure_guy_that_always_changes_his_nickname_to_much
2006-08-04 21654, 2006
dseomn
dseomn is now known as much
2006-08-04 21601, 2006
much
no, I change my nick to much
2006-08-04 21604, 2006
nightgroove
:p
2006-08-04 21610, 2006
nightgroove is now known as Mr_Obscure_guy_that_always_changes_his_nickname_too_much
2006-08-04 21610, 2006
much
much is now known as dseomn
2006-08-04 21615, 2006
nightgroove
goodamn
2006-08-04 21618, 2006
nightgroove
:p
2006-08-04 21621, 2006
dseomn
there you go :)
2006-08-04 21612, 2006
emuzesto has quit
2006-08-04 21620, 2006
nightgroove
it's not my fault, before I came to the musicbrainz chat i didn't even know there was a difference betwenr 'too' and 'to'
2006-08-04 21648, 2006
dseomn
I'm not a grammar cop, I just thought it was funny
2006-08-04 21610, 2006
nightgroove
I know :)
2006-08-04 21616, 2006
nightgroove
dusjen!
2006-08-04 21622, 2006
nightgroove
nightgroove is now known as dusjemo
2006-08-04 21627, 2006
dseomn
dusjen?
2006-08-04 21611, 2006
Freso joined the channel
2006-08-04 21643, 2006
Shepard
shower
2006-08-04 21644, 2006
inhouseuk
mo, so you're saying "only add 'feat' for when its actually in the title" is an unwritten rule, which users wouldn't be aware of and the stylegudes actually contradict it
2006-08-04 21646, 2006
Shepard
hi freso
2006-08-04 21609, 2006
dseomn
Shepard: ah, that explains why mo didn't respond
2006-08-04 21612, 2006
Shepard
they are guidelines :)
2006-08-04 21645, 2006
inhouseuk
shep I know that. But common practice should be documented