#musicbrainz

/

      • toxickore joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26330, 2006

      • asdfqwerty has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26318, 2006

      • slaad has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26312, 2006

      • SoothingR joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26330, 2006

      • Synchro has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26330, 2006

      • Freso joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26305, 2006

      • d3ity
        hey guys

        • 2006-09-20 26310, 2006

      • d3ity
        trouble with picard, can anyone help?

        • 2006-09-20 26319, 2006

      • d3ity
        I've installed libofa, it installed cleanly

        • 2006-09-20 26338, 2006

      • d3ity
        now I'm attempting to install libtunepimp, but libtunepimp can't find libofa

        • 2006-09-20 26308, 2006

      • d3ity
        libofa-0.9.3 and libtunepimp-0.5.1

        • 2006-09-20 26305, 2006

      • flamingcow
        did you install from packages, or hand compile?

        • 2006-09-20 26338, 2006

      • d3ity
        compiled

        • 2006-09-20 26347, 2006

      • d3ity
        packages aren't available for my platform

        • 2006-09-20 26354, 2006

      • flamingcow
        is /usr/local/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf ?

        • 2006-09-20 26301, 2006

      • d3ity
        yes, and I ran ldconfig

        • 2006-09-20 26324, 2006

      • flamingcow
        can you look at the configure log for libtunepimp to see what the actual compiler command line and error are?

        • 2006-09-20 26345, 2006

      • d3ity
        checking for ofa_get_version in -lofa... no

        • 2006-09-20 26358, 2006

      • d3ity
        Then a shiny splash about libofa not existing, when in fact it does exist

        • 2006-09-20 26310, 2006

      • Synchro joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26311, 2006

      • flamingcow
        is there actually a file/symlink named /usr/local/lib/libofa.so ?

        • 2006-09-20 26346, 2006

      • d3ity
        I've got libofa.a, libofa.la, libofa.so, .so.0, .so.0.0.0

        • 2006-09-20 26350, 2006

      • d3ity
        I've got plenty of ofa

        • 2006-09-20 26315, 2006

      • flamingcow
        umm, .so.0.0.0 looks very wrong

        • 2006-09-20 26332, 2006

      • d3ity
        flamingcow, libofa.so.0.0.0

        • 2006-09-20 26336, 2006

      • flamingcow
        i know

        • 2006-09-20 26340, 2006

      • flamingcow
        but it should have the real version there

        • 2006-09-20 26300, 2006

      • flamingcow
        ok, there should be a configure *log* in libtunepimp

        • 2006-09-20 26305, 2006

      • flamingcow
        not just the script output

        • 2006-09-20 26310, 2006

      • flamingcow
        that shows what it's actually running

        • 2006-09-20 26355, 2006

      • d3ity
        right

        • 2006-09-20 26316, 2006

      • d3ity
        gimme a few seconds

        • 2006-09-20 26303, 2006

      • Kerensky97 joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26307, 2006

      • d3ity
        i'm having a pastebin race

        • 2006-09-20 26318, 2006

      • d3ity
        http://www.isul.com.br/labs/pastebin/?id=dbbff474…

        • 2006-09-20 26322, 2006

      • d3ity
        the non english one wins!

        • 2006-09-20 26301, 2006

      • Knio1
        Knio1 is now known as Knio

        • 2006-09-20 26309, 2006

      • flamingcow
        looks like your libofa lacks a reference to libstdc++

        • 2006-09-20 26345, 2006

      • flamingcow
        try:

        • 2006-09-20 26351, 2006

      • flamingcow
        LIBS=-lstdc++ ./configure

        • 2006-09-20 26333, 2006

      • flamingcow
        it may also lack an fftw reference

        • 2006-09-20 26308, 2006

      • flamingcow
        LIBS="-lstdc++ -lfftw" ./configure

        • 2006-09-20 26314, 2006

      • flamingcow
        adjust for your local library names

        • 2006-09-20 26305, 2006

      • d3ity
        lets see what that will do

        • 2006-09-20 26339, 2006

      • d3ity
        nope, nothing

        • 2006-09-20 26340, 2006

      • d3ity
        I'm checking on something with cxxlibs though

        • 2006-09-20 26354, 2006

      • d3ity
        x86_64 is known to have problems with stdc++

        • 2006-09-20 26357, 2006

      • d3ity
        hrm

        • 2006-09-20 26314, 2006

      • flamingcow
        you're running slackware on your x86_64 machine? :-P

        • 2006-09-20 26331, 2006

      • d3ity
        yep

        • 2006-09-20 26344, 2006

      • d3ity
        slamd64

        • 2006-09-20 26349, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        Oh no!

        • 2006-09-20 26319, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        Ticket the lack of packages, I'm sure the maintainer won't mind. ¬_¬

        • 2006-09-20 26325, 2006

      • d3ity
        well, it shouldn't be a problem, cxxlibs are there

        • 2006-09-20 26332, 2006

      • d3ity
        FauxFaux, not all of us want rpms

        • 2006-09-20 26352, 2006

      • FauxFaux
        I meant ticket slamd64. :)

        • 2006-09-20 26319, 2006

      • d3ity
        anyway, what should I try next?

        • 2006-09-20 26345, 2006

      • flamingcow
        http://www.ubuntulinux.org/

        • 2006-09-20 26346, 2006

      • flamingcow
        :-P

        • 2006-09-20 26359, 2006

      • flamingcow
        check the log with that LIBS= enviro

        • 2006-09-20 26303, 2006

      • flamingcow
        and see if it actually used it

        • 2006-09-20 26318, 2006

      • flamingcow
        you need to make sure it's actually linking in stdc++ when it tries to build something with ofa

        • 2006-09-20 26332, 2006

      • Brandon_72 joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26346, 2006

      • Brandon_72 has left the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26306, 2006

      • mudcrow joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26352, 2006

      • Freso has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26357, 2006

      • Tuxie has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26311, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        fttw does have compile problems

        • 2006-09-20 26319, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        d3ity, are you seeing it with abs()

        • 2006-09-20 26341, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        er, nevermind, that's libofa

        • 2006-09-20 26337, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        but, yeah

        • 2006-09-20 26355, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i think it might be an incompatibility with gcc 4.1

        • 2006-09-20 26312, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i don't recall seeing it using 4.0

        • 2006-09-20 26318, 2006

      • Sync joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26313, 2006

      • Synchro has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26358, 2006

      • Knio1 joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26321, 2006

      • pankkake_
        pankkake_ has joined #MusicBrainz

        • 2006-09-20 26324, 2006

      • spacebear_ has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26336, 2006

      • Amblin has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26359, 2006

      • pankkake has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26300, 2006

      • Rondom joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26358, 2006

      • Knio has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26327, 2006

      • d3ity
        ok, heres my current situation

        • 2006-09-20 26336, 2006

      • d3ity
        libofa is installed, libtunepimp fails to find libofa

        • 2006-09-20 26352, 2006

      • d3ity
        gcc version 3.4.6

        • 2006-09-20 26351, 2006

      • d3ity
        could it be a conflict between a previous version of libtunepimp?

        • 2006-09-20 26325, 2006

      • nightgroove joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26323, 2006

      • d3ity
        anyone?

        • 2006-09-20 26337, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        did you run ldconfig after installing libofa?

        • 2006-09-20 26357, 2006

      • d3ity
        ojnkpjg, yep

        • 2006-09-20 26305, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        check config.log and see what error was generated when the configure test for libofa failed

        • 2006-09-20 26314, 2006

      • d3ity
        ojnkpjg, hold on a second

        • 2006-09-20 26327, 2006

      • d3ity
        ojnkpjg, http://www.isul.com.br/labs/pastebin/?id=dbbff474…

        • 2006-09-20 26311, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i don't see anything there

        • 2006-09-20 26314, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i just get the default page

        • 2006-09-20 26333, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i guess it expired?

        • 2006-09-20 26358, 2006

      • d3ity
        ugh

        • 2006-09-20 26305, 2006

      • d3ity
        alright, well I found the chunk that deals with ofa

        • 2006-09-20 26334, 2006

      • d3ity
        ojnkpjg, http://rafb.net/paste/results/cnCqJp68.html It's continues past that, but I saw a recurring theme in the errors

        • 2006-09-20 26322, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        configure:19439: gcc -o conftest -Wall -O2 -Wall -O2 conftest.c -lofa -lexpat -lcurl >&5

        • 2006-09-20 26329, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        it's not linking with libc++

        • 2006-09-20 26334, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        er, stdc++

        • 2006-09-20 26346, 2006

      • d3ity
        ojnkpjg, so how could I solve that

        • 2006-09-20 26311, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        LDFLAGS="-lstdc++" ./configure might work

        • 2006-09-20 26336, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i wonder why it's not doing it by default, though

        • 2006-09-20 26343, 2006

      • d3ity
        20 bucks says its slamd64

        • 2006-09-20 26352, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        what's that?

        • 2006-09-20 26304, 2006

      • d3ity
        x86_64 slackware

        • 2006-09-20 26306, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        h

        • 2006-09-20 26311, 2006

      • d3ity
        cxxlibs are a pain

        • 2006-09-20 26315, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        well, they're using an ancient gcc, too :)

        • 2006-09-20 26331, 2006

      • d3ity
        yeah

        • 2006-09-20 26315, 2006

      • d3ity
        eh

        • 2006-09-20 26322, 2006

      • d3ity
        this ancient gcc is a pain

        • 2006-09-20 26339, 2006

      • Aankhen`` joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26348, 2006

      • Tuxie joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26355, 2006

      • Tuxie has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26334, 2006

      • nightgroove has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26348, 2006

      • ringstrom joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26341, 2006

      • srotta has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26351, 2006

      • Amblin joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26319, 2006

      • ringstrom has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26318, 2006

      • chefkoch_AW has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26326, 2006

      • Tuxie joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26354, 2006

      • chefkoch joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26355, 2006

      • chefkoch
        chefkoch is now known as chefkoch_AW

        • 2006-09-20 26358, 2006

      • chefkoch_AW
        chefkoch_AW is now known as chefkoch

        • 2006-09-20 26320, 2006

      • Aankhen`` has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26349, 2006

      • Tuxie has quit

        • 2006-09-20 26349, 2006

      • gecks joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26348, 2006

      • danbri_laptop joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26336, 2006

      • JavaGeek joined the channel

        • 2006-09-20 26343, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        hello

        • 2006-09-20 26310, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        If I found an album on musicbrainz, but the album is in japanase/Kanji, how can I get a Japanese/Latin release?

        • 2006-09-20 26303, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        nevermind, I found the Japanese/Latin version

        • 2006-09-20 26313, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        should those two be merged?

        • 2006-09-20 26321, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        no

        • 2006-09-20 26352, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        they are the same album, but different script

        • 2006-09-20 26305, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        they are separate deliberately so that people can use which one they wish

        • 2006-09-20 26358, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        ah, I thought both scripts were preserved, and the tool picked the one needed according to preferences

        • 2006-09-20 26346, 2006

      • Kerensky97
        That's what we're building towards but the software doesn't support that yet.

        • 2006-09-20 26348, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        no, not yet. The only way to currently have different scripts is to have separate entries

        • 2006-09-20 26308, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        ok, glad to know that.

        • 2006-09-20 26301, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        btw, I was thinking that musicbrainz would do great if google merged with you :)

        • 2006-09-20 26311, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        or rather, you merged with Google

        • 2006-09-20 26337, 2006

      • gecks
        i preferred the first one :)

        • 2006-09-20 26341, 2006

      • Kerensky97
        They did donate some money to keep it going.

        • 2006-09-20 26300, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        but took you completely, like Picasa...

        • 2006-09-20 26308, 2006

      • JavaGeek
        Google Picard has a nice ring to it :)

        • 2006-09-20 26307, 2006

      • AMurderofCrows joined the channel