#musicbrainz

/

      • chocomo rult inz seng with germlish
      • 2006-02-19 05047, 2006

      • decklin has quit
      • 2006-02-19 05030, 2006

      • chocomo
      • 2006-02-19 05004, 2006

      • decklin joined the channel
      • 2006-02-19 05030, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        a 120 minute discid!
      • 2006-02-19 05035, 2006

      • chocomo
        I noticed
      • 2006-02-19 05041, 2006

      • BGreeNZ
        Where does one get a 120 minute discID from?
      • 2006-02-19 05057, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        has anyone tried greycat's interface?
      • 2006-02-19 05030, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        BGreeNZ: faulty cd hardware
      • 2006-02-19 05043, 2006

      • chocomo
        only one track
      • 2006-02-19 05048, 2006

      • chocomo
        this is garbage
      • 2006-02-19 05055, 2006

      • BGreeNZ
        unless, of course, the publishers bent the Red Book standard to breaking point ;)
      • 2006-02-19 05022, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        wolfsong_: not yet, I was going to look at it in the morning
      • 2006-02-19 05043, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        doesn't work in IE
      • 2006-02-19 05016, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        that's no loss :)
      • 2006-02-19 05044, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        as the most widely used browser it is
      • 2006-02-19 05053, 2006

      • LjL joined the channel
      • 2006-02-19 05006, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        also doesn't work on an artist page
      • 2006-02-19 05032, 2006

      • fuchs has quit
      • 2006-02-19 05006, 2006

      • BGreeNZ
        About the only thing that works in IE are spyware worms. Oh, yes, and all those *** "designed for Internet Explorer" webpages...
      • 2006-02-19 05013, 2006

      • yalaforge has quit
      • 2006-02-19 05022, 2006

      • chocomo
        'ere we goo..
      • 2006-02-19 05033, 2006

      • BGreeNZ
        ... that break in Standard browsers :(
      • 2006-02-19 05036, 2006

      • Jetpack
        whats greycat's interface?
      • 2006-02-19 05049, 2006

      • wolfsong_
      • 2006-02-19 05012, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        Jetpack: the mail to mb-users earlier
      • 2006-02-19 05015, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        BGreeNZ: what's a standard browser?
      • 2006-02-19 05045, 2006

      • chocomo
        that doesn't make anysense! the side bar is right there
      • 2006-02-19 05051, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        there aren't any browsers that are 100% standards complient
      • 2006-02-19 05001, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        chocomo: what sidebar?
      • 2006-02-19 05012, 2006

      • chocomo
        you know, the sidebar search?
      • 2006-02-19 05017, 2006

      • chocomo
        the big ugly grey thing?
      • 2006-02-19 05019, 2006

      • BGreeNZ
        wolfsong_: Any browser that actually follows the http://www.w3c.org/ standards, such as anything but IE
      • 2006-02-19 05019, 2006

      • chocomo
        hello?
      • 2006-02-19 05033, 2006

      • chocomo hugs the sidebar search
      • 2006-02-19 05036, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        none of them do that's my point
      • 2006-02-19 05043, 2006

      • Mudcrow
        you talking about greycats site mo?
      • 2006-02-19 05046, 2006

      • chocomo
        ja
      • 2006-02-19 05001, 2006

      • wolfsong_ has no idea what chocomo is babbling about
      • 2006-02-19 05002, 2006

      • Mudcrow
        its for AR links not for searching
      • 2006-02-19 05009, 2006

      • chocomo
        erh
      • 2006-02-19 05010, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        :-)
      • 2006-02-19 05012, 2006

      • chocomo
        I don't get it
      • 2006-02-19 05026, 2006

      • chocomo
        ar links how+
      • 2006-02-19 05026, 2006

      • Jetpack
        ok ty
      • 2006-02-19 05033, 2006

      • chocomo
        hæ?ty?
      • 2006-02-19 05035, 2006

      • chocomo
        wtf
      • 2006-02-19 05040, 2006

      • chocomo
        talk properly man
      • 2006-02-19 05004, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        if you drag a link to the fields on top it helps with AR link creation
      • 2006-02-19 05018, 2006

      • BGreeNZ
        wolfsong_: Which standard in particular? Last I checked, Mozilla and Opera both implemented HTML 4.01 and CSS 2
      • 2006-02-19 05019, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        are you talking to yourself again chocomo?
      • 2006-02-19 05041, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        no browsers fully support CSS 2
      • 2006-02-19 05001, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        only Opera comes close
      • 2006-02-19 05003, 2006

      • chocomo
        why did you *ignore* everyone else in the channel and such can't see who i'm talkign too ? :p
      • 2006-02-19 05005, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        the first and last standard compliant browser was Mosaic
      • 2006-02-19 05007, 2006

      • chocomo
        haha
      • 2006-02-19 05010, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        FF doesn't
      • 2006-02-19 05012, 2006

      • chocomo points to nikki
      • 2006-02-19 05041, 2006

      • wolfsong_ nods at inhouseuk
      • 2006-02-19 05020, 2006

      • BGreeNZ
        wolfsong_: Which particular part of the spec isn't supported?
      • 2006-02-19 05030, 2006

      • chocomo
        cheese
      • 2006-02-19 05041, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        ham
      • 2006-02-19 05047, 2006

      • LjL
        inhouseuk: but then it *was* the standard :)
      • 2006-02-19 05052, 2006

      • chocomo
        minihamazu!
      • 2006-02-19 05006, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        LjL: exactly :)
      • 2006-02-19 05027, 2006

      • LjL
        inhouseuk: you can't really get a C compiler, either
      • 2006-02-19 05015, 2006

      • ruaok got fed up with FF and started using camino
      • 2006-02-19 05030, 2006

      • chocomo
        doesn't work on Win does it?
      • 2006-02-19 05035, 2006

      • ruaok
        nope
      • 2006-02-19 05037, 2006

      • ruaok
        mac only
      • 2006-02-19 05038, 2006

      • chocomo
        bah
      • 2006-02-19 05041, 2006

      • inhouseuk
        FF has serious memory leaks
      • 2006-02-19 05057, 2006

      • ruaok
        inhouseuk: and it crashes too often
      • 2006-02-19 05059, 2006

      • chocomo
        ff is teh slow shitsnitz
      • 2006-02-19 05059, 2006

      • LjL had heard a bad leak was fixed with 1.5
      • 2006-02-19 05017, 2006

      • ruaok
        LjL: the leaks on mac got MUCH worse with 1.5
      • 2006-02-19 05023, 2006

      • LjL
        ruaok: it was rock-stable for me on windows... much less so on linux, though
      • 2006-02-19 05036, 2006

      • ruaok
        I would liek them to stop adding new features and just focus on stability.
      • 2006-02-19 05040, 2006

      • LjL
        oh, i see... never used the mac version
      • 2006-02-19 05000, 2006

      • LjL
        *firefox* adding features? i mean, have you seen opera? :)
      • 2006-02-19 05028, 2006

      • ruaok
        too true
      • 2006-02-19 05033, 2006

      • chocomo
        I need to download opera sometime
      • 2006-02-19 05038, 2006

      • ruaok
        FF is actually really good about that.
      • 2006-02-19 05043, 2006

      • Shepard
        the FF bookmark manager always makes me laugh
      • 2006-02-19 05048, 2006

      • Shepard
        or cry, can't decide yet
      • 2006-02-19 05051, 2006

      • chocomo
        its a bit annoying
      • 2006-02-19 05053, 2006

      • ruaok
        I just don't want them to do anything new until it stops leaking like a sieve
      • 2006-02-19 05001, 2006

      • chocomo
        ooh
      • 2006-02-19 05006, 2006

      • chocomo
        sieve = sil?
      • 2006-02-19 05016, 2006

      • Jetpack
        the whole concept of bookmarks needs to be overhauled
      • 2006-02-19 05023, 2006

      • Jetpack
        or just thought about again
      • 2006-02-19 05028, 2006

      • LjL
        ruaok: would probably be a good idea technically, but rather not from the "marketing" point of view...
      • 2006-02-19 05046, 2006

      • ruaok
        yeah, they need to stopy worrying about unseating M$
      • 2006-02-19 05012, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        BGreeNZ: i'll try to find the link again
      • 2006-02-19 05015, 2006

      • LjL
        Jetpack: yeah, i can probably think more in terms of an advanced "history" feature than in terms of bookmarks
      • 2006-02-19 05022, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        we had this conversation the other day
      • 2006-02-19 05045, 2006

      • LjL
        ruaok: well they've been succeeding rather well for all i can say
      • 2006-02-19 05004, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        until FF doesn't eat resources left and right i only have it on one machine
      • 2006-02-19 05004, 2006

      • Shepard
        LjL: a personal version of delicious.. bookmarks with tags
      • 2006-02-19 05033, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        try the Bookmark Tags extension
      • 2006-02-19 05036, 2006

      • ruaok
        LjL: yes, they've been gaining users quite nicely. but they just lost one too.
      • 2006-02-19 05044, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        does the same thing locally
      • 2006-02-19 05026, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.ph… it's one of my favorite extensions
      • 2006-02-19 05042, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        ruaok: make that 2
      • 2006-02-19 05058, 2006

      • chocomo
      • 2006-02-19 05059, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        it's not even usable
      • 2006-02-19 05008, 2006

      • chocomo
        i've fixed that artist so its bogusity can just die
      • 2006-02-19 05016, 2006

      • Shepard
        I fear that when I add more stuff to it, it might break :)
      • 2006-02-19 05033, 2006

      • Shepard
        bogusity.. lol
      • 2006-02-19 05047, 2006

      • wolfsong_
        well...
      • 2006-02-19 05048, 2006

      • chocomo
        chocomo, creater of bogus words
      • 2006-02-19 05024, 2006

      • Shepard
        hokus bogus
      • 2006-02-19 05027, 2006

      • fuchs joined the channel
      • 2006-02-19 05035, 2006

      • Shepard
        mahlzeit fuchs
      • 2006-02-19 05047, 2006

      • nikki_
        opera might have everything but the kitchen sink, but at least it's fast
      • 2006-02-19 05053, 2006

      • LjL
        ruaok: well, they've lost me as well, but that's just because i started using KDE instead of Windows and Firefox doesn't have a QT interface... and, i suppose they shouldn't add one just to make me (or a small minority anyway) happy
      • 2006-02-19 05010, 2006

      • ruaok
        hi fuchs, back so soon? how was the concert?
      • 2006-02-19 05023, 2006

      • LjL
        ruaok: granted, fixing memory leak is another story - but still, in a general way, i can understand why they target the majority
      • 2006-02-19 05031, 2006

      • ruaok
        LjL: and konqueror is a fine browser too
      • 2006-02-19 05002, 2006

      • LjL
        ruaok: it's not bad, but i would probably switch back to FF if it had a KDE interface
      • 2006-02-19 05010, 2006

      • LjL
        ruaok: because of extensions, mostly
      • 2006-02-19 05028, 2006

      • ruaok
        yes, i will miss those. hopefully FF will get its act together soon