#musicbrainz

/

      • mo
        yes. and the language sould be differnt
      • 2005-05-12 13249, 2005

      • dupuy
        because you could have a song titled "Happy Valley" with lyrics in any language
      • 2005-05-12 13212, 2005

      • dupuy
        english/cantonese version etc. apply to *tracks* not albums
      • 2005-05-12 13227, 2005

      • dupuy
        rarely is an entire album translated (lyrics and all)
      • 2005-05-12 13236, 2005

      • mo
        and I asked fro track-language ability and was told 'no'
      • 2005-05-12 13249, 2005

      • dupuy
        not 'no', just 'not yet'
      • 2005-05-12 13255, 2005

      • mo
        and why not?
      • 2005-05-12 13259, 2005

      • mo
        it is obviusly needed
      • 2005-05-12 13200, 2005

      • cikkolata
        mb_server is one just rfe ;)
      • 2005-05-12 13201, 2005

      • dupuy
        adding album languages was relatively easy and cheap
      • 2005-05-12 13206, 2005

      • cikkolata
        s/just/huge/
      • 2005-05-12 13212, 2005

      • g0llum
        such features have to grow with ppl using it :>
      • 2005-05-12 13240, 2005

      • dupuy
        we don't even yet have the ability to select album translation/transliteration versions based on preferences
      • 2005-05-12 13242, 2005

      • mo
        and I'm telling you. peopel will not expect language to mean *titles of sonmgs* they will expect *songs sung in*
      • 2005-05-12 13258, 2005

      • dupuy
        and in 90% of the cases, the result is the same!
      • 2005-05-12 13212, 2005

      • dupuy
        so it doesn't matter what they misunderstand
      • 2005-05-12 13223, 2005

      • mo
        yes so why not make the exeption for the 10% where it isnt?
      • 2005-05-12 13230, 2005

      • dupuy
        the cases where they are different; well, thats why we have voting and style guidelines
      • 2005-05-12 13233, 2005

      • cikkolata
        no matter what we do, people will misunderstand something :/
      • 2005-05-12 13240, 2005

      • dupuy
        because it makes the feature useless
      • 2005-05-12 13253, 2005

      • mo
        not to me
      • 2005-05-12 13204, 2005

      • mo
        the current proposition makes it useless to me
      • 2005-05-12 13228, 2005

      • mo
        japanese transaliterated/translated albums are japanese. not english.
      • 2005-05-12 13238, 2005

      • dupuy
        how do you actually *use* the lyrics information?
      • 2005-05-12 13241, 2005

      • mo
        the script isnt kanji/kana its latin
      • 2005-05-12 13249, 2005

      • mo
        not lyrics
      • 2005-05-12 13251, 2005

      • mo
        language
      • 2005-05-12 13259, 2005

      • dupuy
        yes, how is that useless?
      • 2005-05-12 13200, 2005

      • mo
        lyrics can be anything
      • 2005-05-12 13206, 2005

      • cikkolata is lost now
      • 2005-05-12 13210, 2005

      • mo
        most japanese have english words in them!
      • 2005-05-12 13230, 2005

      • dupuy
        but for most songs, there is only one language that it is *ever* performed in
      • 2005-05-12 13240, 2005

      • mo
        they are japanese. they sign in japanese. yet they use only english titles
      • 2005-05-12 13258, 2005

      • mo
        so english /latin????
      • 2005-05-12 13225, 2005

      • cikkolata
        theoretically someone could translate the original titles with english words into japanese
      • 2005-05-12 13229, 2005

      • dupuy
        no that is an edge 1% case, and we say that the titles are written in japanese using only loan words from english
      • 2005-05-12 13230, 2005

      • mo
        yes
      • 2005-05-12 13238, 2005

      • dupuy
        and call it japanese
      • 2005-05-12 13242, 2005

      • mo
        and that would be japanese/katakana
      • 2005-05-12 13211, 2005

      • cikkolata
        not necessarily, you might have a translation which is transliterated
      • 2005-05-12 13212, 2005

      • mo
        the origninal sould be japanese/latin IMHO
      • 2005-05-12 13224, 2005

      • cikkolata thinks her theoretical example is getting silly though
      • 2005-05-12 13232, 2005

      • mo
        :)
      • 2005-05-12 13234, 2005

      • dupuy
        okay, i think i've stated my position and attempted to explain the reasoning
      • 2005-05-12 13247, 2005

      • cikkolata
        thanks :)
      • 2005-05-12 13249, 2005

      • dupuy
        there's a reason i haven't been on IRC in the last few weeks
      • 2005-05-12 13253, 2005

      • mo
        yes. I dont see it or agree with it however :/
      • 2005-05-12 13256, 2005

      • cikkolata
        busy?
      • 2005-05-12 13201, 2005

      • jmw has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13208, 2005

      • mo
        we are chewign him up :)
      • 2005-05-12 13219, 2005

      • dupuy
        and i did make an exception for this one
      • 2005-05-12 13231, 2005

      • dupuy
        cause cikkolata sent me an email asking
      • 2005-05-12 13250, 2005

      • WireD has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13203, 2005

      • mo
        whatever.. I just won't *use* the language thing then :[
      • 2005-05-12 13205, 2005

      • mo
        :)
      • 2005-05-12 13253, 2005

      • mo
        btw, dupuy, while you're here, can you look at http://www.musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=269… and spread the news like you did for other mods?
      • 2005-05-12 13238, 2005

      • luks
        \quit
      • 2005-05-12 13240, 2005

      • luks has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13241, 2005

      • dupuy
        mo, you don't have to use the language thing; one of the nice things about using the titles as the determinant is that Matthias code can use the language guesser, and it will usually guess right (except for that 1% japanese stuff)
      • 2005-05-12 13253, 2005

      • dupuy
        so, "it just happens"
      • 2005-05-12 13227, 2005

      • mo
        ... it quesses the script you mean? (AFAC on test)
      • 2005-05-12 13249, 2005

      • dupuy
        guessing script is very easy, and 99% accurate
      • 2005-05-12 13257, 2005

      • mo
        yes
      • 2005-05-12 13216, 2005

      • dupuy
        guessing language is a little bit harder, not much, and fairly accurate given a large corpus
      • 2005-05-12 13223, 2005

      • dupuy
        (body of works in the languages)
      • 2005-05-12 13246, 2005

      • mo
        it hasn't doe that for me so far on test, though
      • 2005-05-12 13202, 2005

      • dupuy
        I think that Dave actually may have added the code for that
      • 2005-05-12 13234, 2005

      • dupuy
        and if it doesn't yet, it is at least *possible* - guessing the language of lyrics that aren't stored in the DB is impossible
      • 2005-05-12 13258, 2005

      • dupuy
        and we don't store lyrics, and won't do so any time soon (i.e. ever)
      • 2005-05-12 13230, 2005

      • mo
        and we don't store if caps are intentionally supposed to be weird either. we get that info from other websites
      • 2005-05-12 13242, 2005

      • mo
        so why not what language?
      • 2005-05-12 13254, 2005

      • mo
        you keep sayign lyrics. I don't mean lyrics. lyrics are words of the song. I mean the language of the song. (wich is obtaniable fro mthe CD, sites etc)
      • 2005-05-12 13223, 2005

      • mo
        lyrics acan be transaliterated to. songs can't. they can be rerecoded and sung in a different language
      • 2005-05-12 13234, 2005

      • mo
        most opera would be italian fex
      • 2005-05-12 13249, 2005

      • mo
        exept requiem etf. woudl be latin
      • 2005-05-12 13253, 2005

      • mo
        as a language
      • 2005-05-12 13258, 2005

      • mo
        and then
      • 2005-05-12 13236, 2005

      • mo
        it is more often known what language song is sung in, people moderation that is who knowsa nd cares about it. like all other data.
      • 2005-05-12 13208, 2005

      • mo
        to determin the language based only on the title of the song.. well soem words are identical in soem languages.. take scandinavian languages
      • 2005-05-12 13224, 2005

      • dupuy
        that's another reason why we have to use titles, and not songs
      • 2005-05-12 13248, 2005

      • dupuy
        what language is beethoven's fifth symphony in?
      • 2005-05-12 13207, 2005

      • dupuy
        the title can be in german, english, japanese, whatever
      • 2005-05-12 13208, 2005

      • mo
        but asuming the song is not rerecored i na nother language. whatever the title is the language remains the same
      • 2005-05-12 13239, 2005

      • mo
        I don't think its right for a song in a language to be said to be another language just because the title happens to bein that language
      • 2005-05-12 13226, 2005

      • mo
        japanese transaliteratedtrasnalted albusm are not english and newer wil be, neithe is trasnaliterated russian, hebrew or what have you
      • 2005-05-12 13243, 2005

      • mo
        what is that band again.. bodom
      • 2005-05-12 13246, 2005

      • dupuy
        we don't say the song is anything, we just say the album titles are something
      • 2005-05-12 13215, 2005

      • dupuy
        remember, transliteration just changes the script, *not* the language
      • 2005-05-12 13217, 2005

      • mo
        yes but (I think) that we either need a second language table, or simply let the 'script' handle that
      • 2005-05-12 13238, 2005

      • dupuy
        but script can't handle translations of titles
      • 2005-05-12 13259, 2005

      • dupuy
        e.g. Beethoven's symphonies in english or german, script is latin either case
      • 2005-05-12 13200, 2005

      • mo
        a japanese trasnliterated/transalted album is top me japanese/latin
      • 2005-05-12 13216, 2005

      • dupuy
        transliterated, yes
      • 2005-05-12 13220, 2005

      • mo
        yes. but beethoves symphonies doesnt have words in them
      • 2005-05-12 13237, 2005

      • dupuy
        exactly my point
      • 2005-05-12 13247, 2005

      • dupuy
        by your definition, it has no language
      • 2005-05-12 13256, 2005

      • mo
        soldn't have a 'language' at all
      • 2005-05-12 13257, 2005

      • Shepard` joined the channel
      • 2005-05-12 13259, 2005

      • dupuy
        by ours, the titles *do* have a language
      • 2005-05-12 13216, 2005

      • mo
        well I'd call written language script
      • 2005-05-12 13228, 2005

      • dupuy
        script is the characters you use to write it
      • 2005-05-12 13231, 2005

      • mo
        yes
      • 2005-05-12 13243, 2005

      • mo
        the characters made to create the words
      • 2005-05-12 13250, 2005

      • mo
        of a certan language
      • 2005-05-12 13204, 2005

      • mo
        german, english and norwegian are a*all* latin languages
      • 2005-05-12 13219, 2005

      • mo
        but only english is english spoken
      • 2005-05-12 13233, 2005

      • mo
        but all 3 uses latin script
      • 2005-05-12 13250, 2005

      • mo
        bbs
      • 2005-05-12 13201, 2005

      • ruaok is away: bike ride
      • 2005-05-12 13256, 2005

      • dupuy has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13223, 2005

      • DJKC
        ] <dupuy> that's enough; anyhow, i very much dislike making general rules based on DJKC's weird edge cases <--- hehe
      • 2005-05-12 13239, 2005

      • DJKC
        missed him
      • 2005-05-12 13203, 2005

      • Charalambos joined the channel
      • 2005-05-12 13227, 2005

      • mo
        hmrrrr
      • 2005-05-12 13208, 2005

      • jolie joined the channel
      • 2005-05-12 13234, 2005

      • jolie has left the channel
      • 2005-05-12 13246, 2005

      • djce joined the channel
      • 2005-05-12 13206, 2005

      • jmw joined the channel
      • 2005-05-12 13257, 2005

      • claire has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13233, 2005

      • djce is away: bye
      • 2005-05-12 13254, 2005

      • luks joined the channel
      • 2005-05-12 13200, 2005

      • _DiE
        _DiE is now known as RienAPetay
      • 2005-05-12 13201, 2005

      • orwant2 has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13250, 2005

      • Telle has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13253, 2005

      • hdn has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13238, 2005

      • AidsOnYou has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13255, 2005

      • UserErr0r joined the channel
      • 2005-05-12 13242, 2005

      • hdn``
        hdn`` is now known as hdn
      • 2005-05-12 13216, 2005

      • pikapika has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13235, 2005

      • UserErr0r has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13255, 2005

      • UserErr0r joined the channel
      • 2005-05-12 13200, 2005

      • UE|sleep has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13252, 2005

      • mo
      • 2005-05-12 13233, 2005

      • luks
      • 2005-05-12 13251, 2005

      • luks
        "Track 2 contains a sample of "Fool's Paradise", performed by Meli'sa Morgan."
      • 2005-05-12 13208, 2005

      • mo
        oh good then
      • 2005-05-12 13233, 2005

      • mo
        why didnt they site that or something simmilar? :/
      • 2005-05-12 13252, 2005

      • mo
        thansk luks
      • 2005-05-12 13201, 2005

      • mo
        takk luks
      • 2005-05-12 13203, 2005

      • luks
        :)
      • 2005-05-12 13210, 2005

      • luks
        neni zac
      • 2005-05-12 13240, 2005

      • mo
        oh, is that slocvac for you're welcome?
      • 2005-05-12 13242, 2005

      • mo
        neat
      • 2005-05-12 13206, 2005

      • cikkolata giggles
      • 2005-05-12 13213, 2005

      • mo
        :D
      • 2005-05-12 13248, 2005

      • yalaforge has quit
      • 2005-05-12 13210, 2005

      • mnemonix has left the channel
      • 2005-05-12 13258, 2005

      • g0llum
        mo: i've added support for removing an instrument ;)
      • 2005-05-12 13215, 2005

      • g0llum
        that was a b*atch
      • 2005-05-12 13217, 2005

      • g0llum