#musicbrainz

/

      • mo
        the same reason silence gets of his rocket
      • 2005-04-03 09307, 2005

      • mo
        I feel disorientated
      • 2005-04-03 09321, 2005

      • DJKC
        because pop music is different from opera/musicals/classical/etc
      • 2005-04-03 09325, 2005

      • mo
        because I feel if you are right about http://www.musicbrainz.org/showartist.html?artist…
      • 2005-04-03 09332, 2005

      • mo
        then I am right about
      • 2005-04-03 09333, 2005

      • mo
        ah.
      • 2005-04-03 09345, 2005

      • DJKC
        in the hamasaki + keiko case
      • 2005-04-03 09353, 2005

      • mo
        well you see, hedwig and the angry inch kinda crosses between popular music / musical
      • 2005-04-03 09359, 2005

      • DJKC
        it was a series that was specifically taking unrelated artists and having them collaborate
      • 2005-04-03 09314, 2005

      • DJKC
        hamsaki + keiko, koda kumi + boa, namie amuro + verbal, etc
      • 2005-04-03 09324, 2005

      • DJKC
        collaborations were new songs just for the charity series
      • 2005-04-03 09332, 2005

      • DJKC
        so... neither can be considered featuring
      • 2005-04-03 09341, 2005

      • DJKC
        unless you randomly pick one
      • 2005-04-03 09341, 2005

      • mo
        see, it is true that for classical releases we attribute to only to composer
      • 2005-04-03 09358, 2005

      • mo
        yes I know that, I was just trandomly picking one :p
      • 2005-04-03 09315, 2005

      • DJKC
        that's horrible though
      • 2005-04-03 09326, 2005

      • mo
        yes I know
      • 2005-04-03 09328, 2005

      • mo
        sorry..
      • 2005-04-03 09336, 2005

      • DJKC
        I can see if it was like a normal feat on an album
      • 2005-04-03 09343, 2005

      • DJKC
        but the whole series was pairing unrelated artists
      • 2005-04-03 09349, 2005

      • DJKC
        sort of like the spawn movie soundtrack
      • 2005-04-03 09356, 2005

      • mo
        but for the hedwig case, mitchell wrote the text and the original story.. much liek mozart had his stories and eve nlyrics written for him
      • 2005-04-03 09302, 2005

      • DJKC
        moderating any of the songs on there to main feat second would be weird
      • 2005-04-03 09318, 2005

      • mo
        well if you want to revers them be my guess..
      • 2005-04-03 09320, 2005

      • DJKC
        since the whole thing is based on taking unrelated ones and having them do a collaboration
      • 2005-04-03 09334, 2005

      • mo
        you said that already
      • 2005-04-03 09342, 2005

      • mo
        are you listening to me? :p
      • 2005-04-03 09308, 2005

      • DJKC
        partially. this is what I meant by "english needing paragraphs to explain"
      • 2005-04-03 09314, 2005

      • DJKC
        and I was referring to the spawn album in the second case
      • 2005-04-03 09318, 2005

      • DJKC
        and not the song+nation one
      • 2005-04-03 09329, 2005

      • mo
        yea
      • 2005-04-03 09346, 2005

      • mo
        what I'm saying is.. if the dude that wrote the actual play that mozart based his opera on, actually played the main character in that *same* opera, I think we'd allow for crediting him in artist name.. that was just my comment
      • 2005-04-03 09340, 2005

      • mo
        ok I'm done.. you don't care about classical stuff so I guess.. but anyway I appologise if I did anything wrongly
      • 2005-04-03 09347, 2005

      • mo
        I have deleted the mod now :)
      • 2005-04-03 09316, 2005

      • mo
      • 2005-04-03 09329, 2005

      • DJKC
        why do you have "regular edition" in the title for the kokoro odoru single?
      • 2005-04-03 09332, 2005

      • ruaok waves
      • 2005-04-03 09341, 2005

      • mo waves back
      • 2005-04-03 09321, 2005

      • mo
        because that was what it saidon the webiste and it was discussed how singles went out before albums did and thus 'album version' might not be the default version for japanese albums
      • 2005-04-03 09334, 2005

      • mo
        hm...
      • 2005-04-03 09351, 2005

      • mo
        I figured *not* to mess with that until someone coudl preve it wrong
      • 2005-04-03 09355, 2005

      • mo
        *prove
      • 2005-04-03 09304, 2005

      • mo
      • 2005-04-03 09326, 2005

      • mo
        trailing data tracks, and the one to remove the 5th has been aproved but the 6th hasn't .. wird
      • 2005-04-03 09336, 2005

      • mo
        looks freaky :)
      • 2005-04-03 09302, 2005

      • DJKC
        it just says regular edition
      • 2005-04-03 09308, 2005

      • DJKC
        as opposed to first press edition
      • 2005-04-03 09310, 2005

      • mo
        hmm...
      • 2005-04-03 09313, 2005

      • DJKC
        we usually remove that
      • 2005-04-03 09316, 2005

      • DJKC
        and in this case I already did
      • 2005-04-03 09325, 2005

      • mo
        well can you find it without that text?
      • 2005-04-03 09327, 2005

      • DJKC is playing [Folder5] - [Folder+Folder5] - [I WANT YOU BACK]
      • 2005-04-03 09331, 2005

      • DJKC
        find what?
      • 2005-04-03 09306, 2005

      • mo
        find a reference to kokoro odoru witouth -regular edition- plastered in the title
      • 2005-04-03 09322, 2005

      • mo
        the more I run into japanese the more consistant I see the y name their titles
      • 2005-04-03 09315, 2005

      • DJKC
      • 2005-04-03 09326, 2005

      • DJKC
        usually stuff is only tagged as regular/first press when the first press is still available
      • 2005-04-03 09333, 2005

      • DJKC
        after that the listing is just without either tag in it
      • 2005-04-03 09343, 2005

      • SenRepus
        mo, russ, the guy who runs audioscrobbler, was tired of having people complain about hedwig and the webber stuff and came into mirc one day
      • 2005-04-03 09352, 2005

      • mo
        oh?
      • 2005-04-03 09316, 2005

      • SenRepus
        we decided that since things are suposed to be under composer, that was how we would do it... *shrugs*
      • 2005-04-03 09319, 2005

      • DJKC
      • 2005-04-03 09357, 2005

      • mo
        wel lthe yahoo version still says -original version-
      • 2005-04-03 09358, 2005

      • mo
        :p
      • 2005-04-03 09312, 2005

      • mo
        duurr
      • 2005-04-03 09319, 2005

      • DJKC
        huh?
      • 2005-04-03 09323, 2005

      • DJKC
        I was talking about the album title
      • 2005-04-03 09331, 2005

      • DJKC
        �R�R���I�h���i�ʏ�Ձj
      • 2005-04-03 09333, 2005

      • mo
        what the guy changein the artist name..
      • 2005-04-03 09339, 2005

      • mo
        album title!
      • 2005-04-03 09341, 2005

      • mo
        oh
      • 2005-04-03 09345, 2005

      • DJKC
        kokoro odoru (regular edition)
      • 2005-04-03 09312, 2005

      • mo
        yes your'e right.. where is the album with that text in ?
      • 2005-04-03 09330, 2005

      • DJKC
      • 2005-04-03 09340, 2005

      • DJKC
        you had it with (regular edition) in the title
      • 2005-04-03 09345, 2005

      • SenRepus
        i bought some classical stuff to teach myself how to do it right ^_^
      • 2005-04-03 09304, 2005

      • mo
        raahh I was wondering about that.. I saw o nthe site it had ?????? with other things in parantesis.. I think I saaw two different.. so I figured it might belong there. I was in dounbt but opted to include information rather than exlude information
      • 2005-04-03 09315, 2005

      • mo
        SenREous: HighFive!
      • 2005-04-03 09339, 2005

      • mo
        SenRepus*
      • 2005-04-03 09310, 2005

      • SenRepus
        ^_^
      • 2005-04-03 09313, 2005

      • mo
        but DJKC, thinking about that I do not speak japanese, and that english is not my native language.. that one error , is it exusable?
      • 2005-04-03 09318, 2005

      • mo
        or inexsusable?
      • 2005-04-03 09327, 2005

      • DJKC
        mo: your paste came through as question marks. anyway, the difference between http://www.sonymusic.co.jp/Music/Arch/AI/nobodykn… and http://www.sonymusic.co.jp/Music/Arch/AI/nobodykn… is literally "regular edition" for the first and "first press limited release edition"
      • 2005-04-03 09340, 2005

      • mo
        barf ok
      • 2005-04-03 09347, 2005

      • DJKC
        just pointing out what they mean, so you can ignore them in the future
      • 2005-04-03 09348, 2005

      • SenRepus thinks anyone doing japanese stuff deserves a few mistakes to be forgiven
      • 2005-04-03 09355, 2005

      • mo
        that explins it.. I tough it might be some other name i nthe title
      • 2005-04-03 09318, 2005

      • mo
        I'll remember to babelfish EVERYthing fro mnow on
      • 2005-04-03 09342, 2005

      • mo
        I babelfished everythign on the release dates to make sure I imputted 'single' and 'album' correctly
      • 2005-04-03 09344, 2005

      • DJKC
        SenRepus: err, I tend to feel the opposite - people doing Japanese stuff without being able to at least read it need gentle instruction to encourage them to not do stuff incorrectly again
      • 2005-04-03 09352, 2005

      • DJKC
        mo: or just learn by rote
      • 2005-04-03 09357, 2005

      • mo
        exactly
      • 2005-04-03 09305, 2005

      • DJKC
        memorize the first two characters
      • 2005-04-03 09311, 2005

      • DJKC
        since the one means regular and the other means first
      • 2005-04-03 09329, 2005

      • mo
        thanks for taking the time to gently but firmly teaching me these things
      • 2005-04-03 09334, 2005

      • mo
        hm..
      • 2005-04-03 09337, 2005

      • mo
        yes...
      • 2005-04-03 09315, 2005

      • mo
        well sonre or later it will rib off.. I can recongise several hiragana now and I can tel lthe difference of katakana and hiragana witout reference
      • 2005-04-03 09339, 2005

      • SenRepus
        well, ok, youre right
      • 2005-04-03 09307, 2005

      • mo
        I humbly bow
      • 2005-04-03 09314, 2005

      • mo is humble
      • 2005-04-03 09351, 2005

      • mo
        do you guys wanna see a couple of weird albums?
      • 2005-04-03 09324, 2005

      • mo
      • 2005-04-03 09337, 2005

      • SenRepus
        messed up track numbers...
      • 2005-04-03 09345, 2005

      • mo
        jup
      • 2005-04-03 09302, 2005

      • SenRepus
        the dumb guy couldnt do the only one he had a TRM for the right way
      • 2005-04-03 09332, 2005

      • SenRepus submits mod for the second
      • 2005-04-03 09350, 2005

      • mo
        awsome
      • 2005-04-03 09319, 2005

      • mo
        also I seem to have found the very first beliable 'randomly voting 'yes' to everything' random voter!
      • 2005-04-03 09326, 2005

      • mo
      • 2005-04-03 09329, 2005

      • SenRepus
        at least he hasnt voted much
      • 2005-04-03 09341, 2005

      • mo
        yes.. I mean some of the mods are accurate.. simply because your random musicbrainzuser makes soem mods that are (atleast to him/her) accurate, most user don't activly go out to do 'bad' mods
      • 2005-04-03 09306, 2005

      • mo
      • 2005-04-03 09310, 2005

      • mo
        thanks SenRepus
      • 2005-04-03 09308, 2005

      • SenRepus
        mo im not sure what exactly is going on
      • 2005-04-03 09320, 2005

      • mo
        ers
      • 2005-04-03 09329, 2005

      • SenRepus
        the album has a track 26 by Gene Pitney, but not the second track 27 those guys have listed
      • 2005-04-03 09358, 2005

      • mo
        very confusing
      • 2005-04-03 09323, 2005

      • SenRepus
        another site says it has 28 tracks >.<
      • 2005-04-03 09334, 2005

      • mo
        baarg
      • 2005-04-03 09350, 2005

      • mo
        I gotta go see some thing on TV
      • 2005-04-03 09352, 2005

      • mo
        bbl
      • 2005-04-03 09334, 2005

      • somniloquy
        somniloquy is now known as somnambulating
      • 2005-04-03 09302, 2005

      • orogor has quit
      • 2005-04-03 09348, 2005

      • SenRepus
        mo!!!
      • 2005-04-03 09322, 2005

      • SenRepus
        moooo!
      • 2005-04-03 09313, 2005

      • orogor joined the channel
      • 2005-04-03 09356, 2005

      • SenRepus has quit
      • 2005-04-03 09336, 2005

      • SenRepus joined the channel
      • 2005-04-03 09324, 2005

      • SenRepus
        man, mo, youve been gone like an hour and a half
      • 2005-04-03 09339, 2005

      • mo
        yes well I had to watch the norwegian extreme makeover house edition
      • 2005-04-03 09347, 2005

      • mo
        hi
      • 2005-04-03 09349, 2005

      • mo
        SenRepus
      • 2005-04-03 09351, 2005

      • mo
        :)
      • 2005-04-03 09339, 2005

      • Knio-sleep
        Knio-sleep is now known as Knio
      • 2005-04-03 09353, 2005

      • djce is away: bye
      • 2005-04-03 09340, 2005

      • SenRepus
        did you see my link?
      • 2005-04-03 09346, 2005

      • SenRepus
        mo?
      • 2005-04-03 09308, 2005

      • mo
        yes and I voted :)
      • 2005-04-03 09317, 2005

      • SenRepus
        i have another question
      • 2005-04-03 09320, 2005

      • mo
        yes?
      • 2005-04-03 09313, 2005

      • SenRepus
      • 2005-04-03 09317, 2005

      • SenRepus
      • 2005-04-03 09319, 2005

      • SenRepus
        same album...
      • 2005-04-03 09335, 2005

      • SenRepus
        i cant decide which way to merge them, i wanted to get your opinion
      • 2005-04-03 09301, 2005

      • mo
        hm..
      • 2005-04-03 09309, 2005

      • SenRepus
        neither is entirely correct
      • 2005-04-03 09315, 2005

      • SenRepus
        according to my disc
      • 2005-04-03 09323, 2005

      • SenRepus
        but the thing is, im not sure if thats what i have. im pretty sure though
      • 2005-04-03 09330, 2005

      • SenRepus
        i just only have the first disc