#musicbrainz

/

      • canidae joined the channel
      • 2005-02-26 05728, 2005

      • canidae
        i'll kill the one who embrace ibm's hardware
      • 2005-02-26 05757, 2005

      • cikkolata
        ?
      • 2005-02-26 05704, 2005

      • canidae
        i got raid1, 1 ibm disk & 1 wd... the ibm dies, and pulls down my entire system with it
      • 2005-02-26 05738, 2005

      • cikkolata
        :/
      • 2005-02-26 05751, 2005

      • djce
        cikkolata: I don't know what to make of that CSS thing. OK, so we know what's going on now. But two questions come to mind:
      • 2005-02-26 05735, 2005

      • djce
        (1) Is this a bug in those browsers? Since MB's css sets both color and background-color higher up in the document, shouldn't those cascade down to the forms?
      • 2005-02-26 05714, 2005

      • djce
        (2) Which colours should the forms use - MB's document colours, or the "theme" colours set elsewhere?
      • 2005-02-26 05739, 2005

      • djce
        I don't suppose you could look into (1), maybe using the DOM inspector, for me?
      • 2005-02-26 05743, 2005

      • cikkolata
        if it's a bug, it's a bug in every browser I've tried because if I remove the bits of CSS I mentioned, I always get the defaults.
      • 2005-02-26 05747, 2005

      • cikkolata
        sure
      • 2005-02-26 05752, 2005

      • cikkolata
        it's hard to navigate in the dark though
      • 2005-02-26 05755, 2005

      • cikkolata scowls at firefox
      • 2005-02-26 05751, 2005

      • cikkolata
        what exactly do you want me to look at?
      • 2005-02-26 05720, 2005

      • djce
        What CSS rules are in place, and where they come from, which affect one of the input fields (pick one)
      • 2005-02-26 05736, 2005

      • djce
        I suppose it's no different from <a> colours, come to think of it.... everyone knows that even if you set a colour which applies to "html" or "body", that your link colours are still going to be blue/purple or whatever, unless you set them to be something else.
      • 2005-02-26 05740, 2005

      • djce
        It just means that writing CSS can be tricky, because your CSS is always going to interact with the browser's default CSS, and you don't know what or where those defaults are.
      • 2005-02-26 05754, 2005

      • cikkolata nods
      • 2005-02-26 05702, 2005

      • djce
        oh well.... patch? :-)
      • 2005-02-26 05716, 2005

      • djce
        as I say that presumably depends on Q (2) though.
      • 2005-02-26 05739, 2005

      • djce
        Personally I'd opt for using MB's colours, as having black form fields inside a white document looks damn weird to me.
      • 2005-02-26 05753, 2005

      • cikkolata
        I'm not sure what's supposed to happen with form defaults, but browsers seem to assume to use the defaults unless explicitly set
      • 2005-02-26 05709, 2005

      • cikkolata
        and I can't work out where to look in the specs
      • 2005-02-26 05733, 2005

      • cikkolata
        black form fields which are readable are much nicer than ones that aren't though :P
      • 2005-02-26 05750, 2005

      • cikkolata
        I must be the only person on the planet who uses a colour scheme like this
      • 2005-02-26 05747, 2005

      • cikkolata
        and since that's my default colours, I'm used to seeing them black, white ones look odd to me
      • 2005-02-26 05708, 2005

      • cikkolata
        http://lmfao.org.uk/.files/patches/musicbrainz-cs… if you want to use default colours...
      • 2005-02-26 05735, 2005

      • cikkolata thinks
      • 2005-02-26 05717, 2005

      • cikkolata
        if I change it to set the colours rather than using defaults, what should I do about the buttons?
      • 2005-02-26 05740, 2005

      • somnolent
        somnolent is now known as somnout
      • 2005-02-26 05716, 2005

      • cikkolata
        those would look bizarre white
      • 2005-02-26 05732, 2005

      • djce
        grey would be consistent with what I think most people would see anyway
      • 2005-02-26 05707, 2005

      • djce
        rgb(235,233,232)
      • 2005-02-26 05722, 2005

      • SenRepus thinks too...
      • 2005-02-26 05736, 2005

      • SenRepus gets headache
      • 2005-02-26 05736, 2005

      • djce
        same for the button border-color
      • 2005-02-26 05727, 2005

      • cikkolata tries to remember if there's an easy way in CSS to tell the difference between text boxes and buttons
      • 2005-02-26 05759, 2005

      • djce
        input[type="text"]
      • 2005-02-26 05720, 2005

      • djce
        input[type="button"], input[type="submit"], input[type="reset"], button
      • 2005-02-26 05728, 2005

      • djce
        input[type="password"]
      • 2005-02-26 05732, 2005

      • djce
        that sort of thing :-)
      • 2005-02-26 05741, 2005

      • cikkolata
        I could have worked the rest out :P
      • 2005-02-26 05745, 2005

      • cikkolata
        -_-
      • 2005-02-26 05725, 2005

      • djce wonders what that emoticon means... I hope it's friendly :-)
      • 2005-02-26 05737, 2005

      • cikkolata
        the formstyle class isn't set for the google search.
      • 2005-02-26 05746, 2005

      • cikkolata
        it's more of "bleh"
      • 2005-02-26 05753, 2005

      • cikkolata
        I still think you should use defaults :P
      • 2005-02-26 05744, 2005

      • cikkolata
        what about the selects and checkboxes?
      • 2005-02-26 05744, 2005

      • djce
        cikkolata: ok, try the defaults then (i.e. remove color, background-color etc from all form-related elements). Then let's see how the page looks, both in a "dark" and a "light" theme.
      • 2005-02-26 05708, 2005

      • djce
        as long as they work and look usable, let's do that.
      • 2005-02-26 05736, 2005

      • djce
        It doesn't matter to 99% of the world because they use a "light" theme, so it's the same either way :-)
      • 2005-02-26 05742, 2005

      • cikkolata
        exactly
      • 2005-02-26 05752, 2005

      • cikkolata
        and the ones who don't are used to their silly colours
      • 2005-02-26 05756, 2005

      • djce
        the only change to most people would be in the sidebar
      • 2005-02-26 05704, 2005

      • cikkolata
        yeah
      • 2005-02-26 05710, 2005

      • djce
        the light gray form fields becoming white (for most people)
      • 2005-02-26 05727, 2005

      • djce
        (uuugh I spelt grey wrong. I feel dirty)
      • 2005-02-26 05755, 2005

      • cikkolata
        blame html and css or something
      • 2005-02-26 05731, 2005

      • cikkolata
        duhh.
      • 2005-02-26 05735, 2005

      • cikkolata
        I'm having a stupid moment.
      • 2005-02-26 05750, 2005

      • cikkolata
        ssh doesn't copy files as well as scp does.
      • 2005-02-26 05705, 2005

      • cikkolata
        (that is, the command "ssh")
      • 2005-02-26 05721, 2005

      • cikkolata
        I broke my mb_server again (or rather the db), so I can't show you it properly, but http://lmfao.org.uk/.files/ffmbdark.png for my dark theme after those CSS changes, http://lmfao.org.uk/.files/ffmbgodthatsbright.png default GTK colours, http://lmfao.org.uk/.files/ffmbinverse.png the inverse of my theme
      • 2005-02-26 05726, 2005

      • cikkolata
        which reminds me...
      • 2005-02-26 05713, 2005

      • cikkolata
        ruaok told me to talk to you about the album language stuff and find out what you think still needs doing
      • 2005-02-26 05714, 2005

      • SenRepus
        Aha!
      • 2005-02-26 05718, 2005

      • cikkolata
        aha?
      • 2005-02-26 05743, 2005

      • SenRepus
        nothing. im making progress in my sorting of Freezepop...
      • 2005-02-26 05748, 2005

      • cikkolata
        ah
      • 2005-02-26 05707, 2005

      • SenRepus
        it is good
      • 2005-02-26 05725, 2005

      • SenRepus
        we've (everyone on MB) mixed up two different CDs
      • 2005-02-26 05732, 2005

      • SenRepus
        realeases of a CD, rather
      • 2005-02-26 05710, 2005

      • cikkolata
        http://www.musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=236… <- do people even /look/ at what they're importing? :/
      • 2005-02-26 05710, 2005

      • SenRepus
        doubt it
      • 2005-02-26 05726, 2005

      • canidae
        Feb 26 19:25:11 san smartd[1961]: Device: /dev/hdb, SMART Usage Attribute: 194 Temperature_Celsius changed from 220 to 239
      • 2005-02-26 05729, 2005

      • canidae sighs
      • 2005-02-26 05744, 2005

      • cikkolata
        o_O
      • 2005-02-26 05745, 2005

      • canidae
        anyone wants egg & bacon? :p
      • 2005-02-26 05749, 2005

      • SenRepus
        owned
      • 2005-02-26 05717, 2005

      • SenRepus
        i cant beleive the tagger doesnt stop asking for money after you donate. at least wait a month or something
      • 2005-02-26 05737, 2005

      • ruaok rolls out of bed
      • 2005-02-26 05742, 2005

      • cikkolata
        hi ruaok!
      • 2005-02-26 05744, 2005

      • ruaok
        djce: you around?
      • 2005-02-26 05746, 2005

      • ruaok
        cikkolata: hey!
      • 2005-02-26 05750, 2005

      • djce
        hi
      • 2005-02-26 05712, 2005

      • ruaok
        I was just reading your mail...
      • 2005-02-26 05729, 2005

      • g0|away
        hi
      • 2005-02-26 05735, 2005

      • g0|away
        g0|away is now known as g0llum
      • 2005-02-26 05742, 2005

      • cikkolata
        hi g0llum!
      • 2005-02-26 05717, 2005

      • ruaok
        djce: the problem is that the drag and drop operations and how items in a listbox get selected acts differently under windows and linux.
      • 2005-02-26 05734, 2005

      • djce
        I suspected as much. But for me, on linux, the code is wrong.
      • 2005-02-26 05752, 2005

      • ruaok
        so, those lines that do inconsistent things are a silly attempt at making it behave the same on all oses
      • 2005-02-26 05755, 2005

      • djce
        which is presumably the opposite of what you were expecting.
      • 2005-02-26 05712, 2005

      • ruaok
        well, there is also a chance that things have been fixed in 2.5.3
      • 2005-02-26 05722, 2005

      • ruaok
        thus breaking linux.
      • 2005-02-26 05723, 2005

      • djce
        right. WX version you mean?
      • 2005-02-26 05727, 2005

      • ruaok
        yes.
      • 2005-02-26 05738, 2005

      • djce
        what ver do you have?
      • 2005-02-26 05749, 2005

      • ruaok
        so, I'd say go ahead fix it and then we'll have to test it under windows
      • 2005-02-26 05752, 2005

      • ruaok
        2.5.3.1
      • 2005-02-26 05753, 2005

      • djce
        (and what ver do I have? /me runs to dpkg...)
      • 2005-02-26 05707, 2005

      • ruaok
        I haven't tested 2.5.3.1 under windows.
      • 2005-02-26 05713, 2005

      • djce
        wxpython2.5.3 2.5.3.2
      • 2005-02-26 05722, 2005

      • ruaok
        yeah.
      • 2005-02-26 05705, 2005

      • cikkolata
        heh. this stupid cccd fools whatever it is that cdlookup.py uses, but not cdparanoia.
      • 2005-02-26 05711, 2005

      • cikkolata finds that /hilarious/
      • 2005-02-26 05710, 2005

      • SenRepus
        hey guys, can you check this mod out, i dont want it to fail and if anyone thinks its wrong i can delete it
      • 2005-02-26 05711, 2005

      • SenRepus
      • 2005-02-26 05718, 2005

      • SenRepus
        i think its right though, some ass voted against it
      • 2005-02-26 05730, 2005

      • SenRepus
        g0llum can ignore it thought he voted
      • 2005-02-26 05733, 2005

      • cikkolata carries on giggling madly.
      • 2005-02-26 05717, 2005

      • SenRepus
        -_-
      • 2005-02-26 05709, 2005

      • mae^ joined the channel
      • 2005-02-26 05756, 2005

      • SenRepus
        and no one looked at that link did they?
      • 2005-02-26 05722, 2005

      • cikkolata
        I did
      • 2005-02-26 05738, 2005

      • ruaok
        SenRepus: thanks for the donation!
      • 2005-02-26 05744, 2005

      • cikkolata
        I'm too busy finding this funny.
      • 2005-02-26 05706, 2005

      • cikkolata
        ruaok: has your chocolate made it yet?
      • 2005-02-26 05715, 2005

      • ruaok
        nope, not yet.
      • 2005-02-26 05742, 2005

      • ruaok
        It took a check from portland 8 days to make it 800 miles to my house.
      • 2005-02-26 05750, 2005

      • cikkolata
        that's stupid.
      • 2005-02-26 05706, 2005

      • cikkolata
        well, the mail's being slow, my friend's stuff only made it yesterday
      • 2005-02-26 05707, 2005

      • ruaok
        If that is any indicator on the chocolate, I'm expecting it in september. melted.
      • 2005-02-26 05729, 2005

      • cikkolata
        and she's in nebraska
      • 2005-02-26 05741, 2005

      • cikkolata giggles
      • 2005-02-26 05729, 2005

      • ruaok is a dumbass
      • 2005-02-26 05741, 2005

      • ruaok
        I should've checked the mail before jumping online.
      • 2005-02-26 05745, 2005

      • ruaok
        cikkolata: guess what arrived?
      • 2005-02-26 05700, 2005

      • ruaok likes the blue duct tape.
      • 2005-02-26 05706, 2005

      • cikkolata
        woo!
      • 2005-02-26 05719, 2005

      • ruaok
        nearly 10 pounds postage?
      • 2005-02-26 05728, 2005

      • cikkolata
        told you they're cunts.
      • 2005-02-26 05733, 2005

      • ruaok
        you're crazy, but I love you anyway!
      • 2005-02-26 05736, 2005

      • cikkolata
        :)
      • 2005-02-26 05723, 2005

      • ruaok promises to NOT eat it all at once
      • 2005-02-26 05727, 2005

      • ruaok beams
      • 2005-02-26 05704, 2005

      • cikkolata grins
      • 2005-02-26 05707, 2005

      • djce
        another happy hacker :-)
      • 2005-02-26 05727, 2005

      • ruaok
        Hmmm. darker shade shade of chocolate
      • 2005-02-26 05729, 2005

      • ruaok
        hmmm.
      • 2005-02-26 05739, 2005

      • cikkolata
        darker shade shade?
      • 2005-02-26 05705, 2005

      • ruaok
        The milk chocolate says: "A darker shade of chocolate"
      • 2005-02-26 05710, 2005

      • ruaok
        (only one shade)
      • 2005-02-26 05712, 2005

      • djce
      • 2005-02-26 05714, 2005

      • cikkolata
        ah
      • 2005-02-26 05721, 2005

      • ruaok
        perfect breakfast!
      • 2005-02-26 05705, 2005

      • cikkolata
        did you like the little fibonacci sequence? I thought it was hilarious.
      • 2005-02-26 05723, 2005

      • ruaok
        Your two/three pounds of chocolate made it faster from the UK than the damned check from Portland.
      • 2005-02-26 05744, 2005

      • ruaok
        the one unit sequence?
      • 2005-02-26 05749, 2005

      • ruaok
        yes, I did chuckle.