-
inhouseuk
g0llum|school: that cd index is invalid because it contains the data track.
2005-06-17 16832, 2005
-
inhouseuk
it should be removed and the album merged
2005-06-17 16841, 2005
-
g0llum|school
so what? it describes the fact that this cd has a data track
2005-06-17 16854, 2005
-
_mo
if it was at the beggining, yes
2005-06-17 16856, 2005
-
_mo
but not
2005-06-17 16800, 2005
-
inhouseuk
the data is the 2nd session on the cd
2005-06-17 16836, 2005
-
g0llum|school
ok. i'll change my vote
2005-06-17 16847, 2005
-
_mo
thank you :p
2005-06-17 16858, 2005
-
_mo
for a minute there I thoguh *i* did soemthign wrong
2005-06-17 16823, 2005
-
g0llum|school is a bit clueless it seems when it comes to discid's
2005-06-17 16852, 2005
-
inhouseuk
yeah, they can be confusing :)
2005-06-17 16838, 2005
-
inhouseuk just realised he hadn't voted on the cd index remove - has now :)
2005-06-17 16809, 2005
-
_mo
:)
2005-06-17 16821, 2005
-
inhouseuk
_mo: when the index has gone. put in the data track delete and the merge. no need to wait for the data track to be deleted first
2005-06-17 16842, 2005
-
inhouseuk
obviously post the mod links here
2005-06-17 16834, 2005
-
_mo
ja
2005-06-17 16816, 2005
-
inhouseuk
on the merge, put a note saying the data track delete is in progress with a link to it :)
2005-06-17 16817, 2005
-
_mo
usually I do, in case the oen goes trough before the other and causes mayhem, but because I got el voting staffhere on irc I can do it :)
2005-06-17 16832, 2005
-
_mo
am I the only person who thinks that two ending )) are ugly even if they are 'tecnically' correct?
2005-06-17 16838, 2005
-
_mo
2005-06-17 16849, 2005
-
_mo
I would just either amke them seperate or leave it
2005-06-17 16816, 2005
-
inhouseuk
that mod is not correct
2005-06-17 16855, 2005
-
_mo
thought so
2005-06-17 16801, 2005
-
inhouseuk
the feat. should be outside the other parens
2005-06-17 16831, 2005
-
_mo
whenever I need (something in pparantesis (inside paranthesis) I always ommit the last one (or add another oen at the end)
2005-06-17 16848, 2005
-
_mo
(like (maybe) so)
2005-06-17 16858, 2005
-
_mo
never (like (maybe so))
2005-06-17 16811, 2005
-
_mo
)) is UGLY
2005-06-17 16815, 2005
-
inhouseuk guesses _mo is not a programmer
2005-06-17 16809, 2005
-
luks_
and surely not a lisp programmer :)
2005-06-17 16814, 2005
-
_mo
eh?
2005-06-17 16817, 2005
-
_mo
o_O
2005-06-17 16851, 2005
-
_mo
are you making lew comments about my sexual orientation? ´o_O`
2005-06-17 16817, 2005
-
_mo confused
2005-06-17 16849, 2005
-
luks_
heh. this is some lisp code:
2005-06-17 16850, 2005
-
luks_
(switch-to-buffer (other-buffer)))
2005-06-17 16813, 2005
-
_mo
aha
2005-06-17 16827, 2005
-
_mo
MPH!
2005-06-17 16831, 2005
-
_mo
2005-06-17 16838, 2005
-
_mo
>_<
2005-06-17 16856, 2005
-
_mo
2005-06-17 16802, 2005
-
_mo
the other oen has CD ids see
2005-06-17 16813, 2005
-
_mo
so I cant merge them until that track goes byebye
2005-06-17 16811, 2005
-
luks_
luks_ is now known as luks
2005-06-17 16827, 2005
-
_mo
great.. I have to wait another hour >_<
2005-06-17 16814, 2005
-
inhouseuk
I think the word is "bollocks"
2005-06-17 16857, 2005
-
Shepard is missing the 'Edit All' link on VA albums
2005-06-17 16824, 2005
-
inhouseuk
nope, you're not missing it. It doesn't exist :)
2005-06-17 16826, 2005
-
g0llum|school
bye!
2005-06-17 16831, 2005
-
g0llum|school has left the channel
2005-06-17 16839, 2005
-
Shepard
yeah that's the problem :)
2005-06-17 16803, 2005
-
Shepard
have to click edit for every single track just to correct the case -.-
2005-06-17 16827, 2005
-
inhouseuk
I think the reason it doesn't exist is because nobody has coded it yet
2005-06-17 16833, 2005
-
eponae
eponae is now known as epoaway
2005-06-17 16838, 2005
-
Daedalus- joined the channel
2005-06-17 16857, 2005
-
Daedalus has quit
2005-06-17 16828, 2005
-
Daedalus-
Daedalus- is now known as Daedalus
2005-06-17 16819, 2005
-
inhouseuk
Shepard: I've left a few notes on your Andrews Sisters mods :)
2005-06-17 16827, 2005
-
ValHallA|SW joined the channel
2005-06-17 16829, 2005
-
Shepard
are you sure about this?
2005-06-17 16846, 2005
-
inhouseuk
pretty sure yup
2005-06-17 16851, 2005
-
Shepard
ok
2005-06-17 16803, 2005
-
Shepard
cause then I have to change some other tracks :)
2005-06-17 16816, 2005
-
inhouseuk
sorry :)
2005-06-17 16851, 2005
-
Shepard
np should be correct :)
2005-06-17 16830, 2005
-
inhouseuk
it's always worth doing a quick check on one of the other databases. allmusic does make some mistakes, but most of the time it is pretty good
2005-06-17 16834, 2005
-
theturtle_ has quit
2005-06-17 16855, 2005
-
luks has quit
2005-06-17 16805, 2005
-
inhouseuk needs to go and get some shopping - back in a bit
2005-06-17 16837, 2005
-
Shepard
ok finished with them
2005-06-17 16841, 2005
-
_mo
yes!
2005-06-17 16842, 2005
-
_mo
2005-06-17 16842, 2005
-
g0llum joined the channel
2005-06-17 16851, 2005
-
klang has quit
2005-06-17 16816, 2005
-
klang joined the channel
2005-06-17 16823, 2005
-
_mo
2005-06-17 16808, 2005
-
g0llum
yup
2005-06-17 16818, 2005
-
epoaway
epoaway is now known as eponae
2005-06-17 16848, 2005
-
tumle has quit
2005-06-17 16849, 2005
-
xchatuser002
xchatuser002 is now known as tumlexchat
2005-06-17 16837, 2005
-
tumle2
tumle2 is now known as tumle
2005-06-17 16851, 2005
-
Telle|away
Telle|away is now known as Telle
2005-06-17 16811, 2005
-
clash has quit
2005-06-17 16818, 2005
-
HenkPoley joined the channel
2005-06-17 16815, 2005
-
lObotor has quit
2005-06-17 16826, 2005
-
g0llum
2005-06-17 16838, 2005
-
DJKC
leave as is, add Junkie XL and Elvis as members of the collaboration via AR would be my preference
2005-06-17 16828, 2005
-
_mo
hmmmm
2005-06-17 16835, 2005
-
_mo
but seriusly
2005-06-17 16852, 2005
-
_mo
Junkie XL never met Elvis in real life, did he?
2005-06-17 16805, 2005
-
enjayhch
I get very confused with weather pseudo artists should exist or not
2005-06-17 16819, 2005
-
_mo
always ami for feat Is what I say
2005-06-17 16834, 2005
-
_mo
unless the artist *spesifically* intended and its a valid bogus artist name
2005-06-17 16835, 2005
-
_mo
:p
2005-06-17 16848, 2005
-
_mo
not helpful with other words
2005-06-17 16832, 2005
-
Shepard has quit
2005-06-17 16855, 2005
-
enjayhch
heh
2005-06-17 16805, 2005
-
enjayhch
I kinda feel I should delete my mod
2005-06-17 16813, 2005
-
enjayhch
and do it bit by bit
2005-06-17 16814, 2005
-
_mo
wich ones?
2005-06-17 16819, 2005
-
_mo
oh that
2005-06-17 16826, 2005
-
_mo
you're numfrjey
2005-06-17 16827, 2005
-
_mo
?
2005-06-17 16828, 2005
-
enjayhch is known as nhumfrey
2005-06-17 16831, 2005
-
_mo
aha
2005-06-17 16847, 2005
-
enjayhch
hum
2005-06-17 16800, 2005
-
_mo
well I don't know
2005-06-17 16817, 2005
-
_mo
anything that gets rid of feat. presents or vs' artist is a good thing with me :)
2005-06-17 16859, 2005
-
duncf joined the channel
2005-06-17 16802, 2005
-
enjayhch
think I will go and have BBQ and sort it out later
2005-06-17 16814, 2005
-
_mo
heh lol
2005-06-17 16812, 2005
-
clash-
clash- is now known as clash
2005-06-17 16817, 2005
-
inhouseuk
_mo: in that case it was a previously unreleased Elvis track, it just happened that the only version that was eventually released was remixed by JXL
2005-06-17 16844, 2005
-
_mo
hmh
2005-06-17 16800, 2005
-
_mo
then it soudl be under elvis and have 'JXL' remix i nthe title
2005-06-17 16820, 2005
-
inhouseuk
yup, which is what I put on the mod notes
2005-06-17 16837, 2005
-
Daedalus has quit
2005-06-17 16846, 2005
-
_mo
I can automod them if you like?
2005-06-17 16813, 2005
-
DJKC
it's not that simple though
2005-06-17 16814, 2005
-
_mo
nj?
2005-06-17 16820, 2005
-
Shepard joined the channel
2005-06-17 16859, 2005
-
clash has quit
2005-06-17 16828, 2005
-
_mo
nj?
2005-06-17 16845, 2005
-
inhouseuk
I think it should be investigated / discussed more before it is automod'ed
2005-06-17 16850, 2005
-
_mo
aright
2005-06-17 16820, 2005
-
_mo
note that many of the tracks have 'JXL remix' tacked on to them already
2005-06-17 16812, 2005
-
inhouseuk
yes! I was going to check who it was attributed to when it was released. I think it was Elvis, but let me check
2005-06-17 16810, 2005
-
_mo
even if it wasn't, if elvis was the artist, then elvis was the artist. JXL needs to be credited for his remix, surly
2005-06-17 16817, 2005
-
_mo
, but yea
2005-06-17 16834, 2005
-
DJKC
there's a single that was put under the Elvis vs JXL I thought
2005-06-17 16843, 2005
-
_mo
but
2005-06-17 16858, 2005
-
_mo
what does 'vs' mean in this?
2005-06-17 16819, 2005
-
_mo
does it mean they went up o na stage ans fought it down rapper style? no
2005-06-17 16840, 2005
-
DJKC
o.O does vs normally mean that?
2005-06-17 16844, 2005
-
_mo
was either a quest singer on the others track album+ no
2005-06-17 16850, 2005
-
_mo
I dunno
2005-06-17 16851, 2005
-
DJKC
it doesn't on any of the vs style collaborations I've ever heard ^^;
2005-06-17 16852, 2005
-
inhouseuk
typical: from the official uk charts:
2005-06-17 16854, 2005
-
inhouseuk
SEARCH RESULTS
2005-06-17 16855, 2005
-
inhouseuk
1. Elvis vs JXL:
2005-06-17 16857, 2005
-
inhouseuk
A Little Less Conversation (22/6/2002)
2005-06-17 16802, 2005
-
_mo
it means either remixed feat or 'and'
2005-06-17 16835, 2005
-
DJKC
somewhere between "remixed" and "and" in this case
2005-06-17 16848, 2005
-
_mo
true vs is somethign esle than alot of stuf with vs artist currently i nthe DB
2005-06-17 16839, 2005
-
_mo
I vote for tackign JXL remix and crediting him with an ART.. altough.. do whe ave a 'remixed' AR?
2005-06-17 16813, 2005
-
DJKC
but that's not what it was released under at all. Both members of a a collaboration have to be aive and present for it to be one?
2005-06-17 16828, 2005
-
_mo
at the tiem oif the colab, definitly
2005-06-17 16846, 2005
-
_mo
how can someone be i na band togeter if at the tiem of band existance, one is *dead*?
2005-06-17 16853, 2005
-
transmogrify has quit
2005-06-17 16820, 2005
-
inhouseuk
because previously recorded sessions exist
