There isn't documentation for this somewhere that I've missed, is there? Beyond the ?
2005-01-04 00446, 2005
canidae
the tp_tagger isn't very well documented, afaik
2005-01-04 00401, 2005
kass
Fair enough really, for an example proggie
2005-01-04 00410, 2005
canidae
it's not really something they're still working on, as they're moving on to this new "picard" program
2005-01-04 00443, 2005
kass nods. picard doesn't seem to have much to it yet. I looked at it and went on to fight with the 3rd party software
2005-01-04 00413, 2005
wheels has quit
2005-01-04 00400, 2005
wheels joined the channel
2005-01-04 00458, 2005
ruaok wakes up
2005-01-04 00414, 2005
ruaok
kass: do you work for the BBC??
2005-01-04 00458, 2005
cikkolata looks confused
2005-01-04 00437, 2005
cikkolata
apparently, on the 3rd december 1997, U2 were playing in mexico, yet they somehow managed two different setlists, if these bootlegs are anything to go by.
2005-01-04 00432, 2005
ruaok
cikkolata: U2 could've played two concerts that day, no?
2005-01-04 00446, 2005
ruaok
then again, bootleggers are notorious for bad metadata.
2005-01-04 00432, 2005
cikkolata
it doesn't seem likely.
2005-01-04 00441, 2005
cikkolata
(to them playing twice in one day)
2005-01-04 00455, 2005
ruaok
I've seen it happen with big venues, but not typically with big-ass stars.
2005-01-04 00415, 2005
ruaok
most likely and error, I gotta agree.
2005-01-04 00451, 2005
cikkolata
yeah, it's not a particularly short concert
2005-01-04 00409, 2005
soccos joined the channel
2005-01-04 00419, 2005
somniloquy
somniloquy is now known as somnout
2005-01-04 00413, 2005
ruaok
canidae: you around?
2005-01-04 00448, 2005
soccos has quit
2005-01-04 00427, 2005
kass
ruaok, no ... :)
2005-01-04 00442, 2005
kass then afks and sleeps.
2005-01-04 00441, 2005
ruaok
kass: I met an american lady named kass in London a few weeks back. The meeting was MB related, so I was just checking to see if it was her.
2005-01-04 00439, 2005
somnout has quit
2005-01-04 00405, 2005
somnout joined the channel
2005-01-04 00401, 2005
Muti
hmm.. is there something up with the site?
2005-01-04 00408, 2005
Muti
seems to be really laggy
2005-01-04 00444, 2005
ruaok
must be your connection.
2005-01-04 00450, 2005
ruaok
32.5ms ping times for me
2005-01-04 00456, 2005
ruaok
pages load ok
2005-01-04 00421, 2005
ruaok
load avg is ok.
2005-01-04 00425, 2005
Muti
hmm, okay
2005-01-04 00441, 2005
cikkolata
I'm getting packet loss, but I normally blame my connection
2005-01-04 00456, 2005
cikkolata
and an average of 600ms for pings
2005-01-04 00420, 2005
ruaok
round-trip min/avg/max = 32.4/38.4/126.4 ms
2005-01-04 00421, 2005
DJKC
very slow responding here too, actually. 30-60 seconds per page load
2005-01-04 00441, 2005
Muti
odd, ping times are really low for me but the page load time is about 20 seconds
