for the menu elements, they should all have the same color (unlike page content, where it's useful IMO)
but we do override the link colors anyway, an you can't make out that big a difference -> so it looks more like an error to users if you don't stick to the colour scheme
finally something where exon is right, most times i'm a bit annoyed by his comments
djce
True, I've just never found it necessary to add those rules.
:-) but in a way, he's right.
g0llum
always. but he'd like a homepage like google after all :)
djce
There is a balance to strike between accessibility and looking nice.
It's hard, I think we'd all agree that.
g0llum
i forgot to add the sixth patch before sending you the whole stuff
nikki_
I often turn off css just so I can see which links I've been to because mb makes everything the same :/
hmm
I wish opera had an option to use a stylesheet just for one site...
then I could change anything I wanted without worrying about destroying the rest of the web
djce
g0llum: are you hacking on your server at the moment?
nikki_
I managed to change the pending edit colour without killing other websites, but that's a class and stuff
djce
I hope so, 'cos it looks rather broken.
g0llum
just applied the 6th patch again
what was broken?
djce
want a snapshot? quite a bit.
g0llum
nikki_: i've promised you we'll try to come up with a minimal stylesheet you'll like ok?
nikki_
yay!!
nikki_ hugs g0llum
g0llum
djce: yes
djce
ok, 1 min/
Russss
XSL is evil
dseomn
Russss: why?
Russss
mainly because I don't know it :P
djce
oh wait, either you just fixed it or my cache wasn't cleaned :-) it's ok now.
Russss
but it's better than DSSSL :P
dseomn
yeah, much better
Shepard
XSL-T is funny
g0llum
the only thing that still breaks the opera-stuff, is
* Home (sidebar open)
Shepard
but crap because it's a programming language in XML which is not what anyone wants ;)
g0llum
* close sidebar
* go contribute
* back home
* open sidebar
dseomn
Shepard: it's not really a prog language
Russss
XSL isn't really a programming language though
heh
wheras DSSSL is. Kind of.
Shepard
it is supposed to be
for a certain task only but it is
dseomn
no, it's meant for transformations
g0llum is getting too old for this :)
programming languages are more complex (e.g. C) or convoluted (e.g. asm or bf)
luks
well, it has foreach, if, else, ... :P
Russss
it's a template language
dseomn
it's halfway b/t markup and macro
luks
it is markup!
XML :D
dseomn
that's like saying C is text/plain
Shepard
right
so it's a programming language :P
but only with a certain focus
Russss
who cares, it's annoying
Shepard
so it's limited
Russss
I'm beginning to doubt if it is actually better than DSSSL
luks likes XSL-FO
dseomn
Russss: it's much better than DSSSL if you're working w/ XML
what are you (thinking of) using it for anyway?
Russss
docbook
I want to make HTML from docbook which doesn't look shite
dseomn
ooh, that's going to take some effort
Russss
hah
dseomn
XSLT is definitely easier than DSSSL for that
djce has quit
I was thinking of doing something like that for my website, but I found parsewiki which worked much better for me
it's a DJ-mix, but i think the same style should apply
Shepard
and dseomn, as i said yesterday: it's very complex at the moment and noone will remember the rules. perhaps you could simplify them so that still everyone knows what to do in every case. or you could add a FAQ below like on PartNumberStyle instead
fuchs
dseomn: and add some formating as on the other style guides, it's very hard to get the point ;)
dseomn
ok, /me looks at other style guides
fuchs
things like "If the ?TrackTitle ends in "medley" it should be changed to "(medley)" unless the ?TrackTitle is "medley" in which case it shouldn't be changed. Also, if the word medley is obviously part of the ?TrackTitle it should not be converted to (medley)." are very hard to understand, f.e.
dseomn is not very good at simple and precise wording