it was only manually and only created the entry if the feat. artist was in the db and easily matched to the name. Did it even do it on album titles? I only saw them created from song titles
2005-09-07 25033, 2005
dseomn has quit
2005-09-07 25041, 2005
fuchs
yes, song titles only
2005-09-07 25013, 2005
dseomn joined the channel
2005-09-07 25059, 2005
FauxFaux joined the channel
2005-09-07 25013, 2005
dseomn has quit
2005-09-07 25050, 2005
dseomn joined the channel
2005-09-07 25017, 2005
schmidtma has quit
2005-09-07 25026, 2005
FauxFaux has quit
2005-09-07 25010, 2005
FauxFaux joined the channel
2005-09-07 25057, 2005
_mo
I knew Clutchie would love that :)
2005-09-07 25020, 2005
_mo
also <mrneil> sorry, can't PM until I register or some such... anyway, everything looks AOK
2005-09-07 25058, 2005
_mo
mrneil: if you can get the perosn you're PMing to set it there is a switch i nthe freenode thingy to alow pm messages from unregidtred users
2005-09-07 25027, 2005
_mo
but I think you need to search for it with freenode HELP or something, as I forgot what it was
you know, in 10-20 years it's going to officially be u-country
2005-09-07 25004, 2005
fuchs
_mo: /msg nickserv set unfiltered on ;)
2005-09-07 25009, 2005
_mo
>_<
2005-09-07 25013, 2005
fuchs
but why would one want to do that? :)
2005-09-07 25016, 2005
_mo
there you go! thanks fuchs
2005-09-07 25027, 2005
_mo
<mrneil> sorry, can't PM until I register or some such... anyway, everything looks AOK
2005-09-07 25005, 2005
fuchs
mrneil: then register, it's easy :)
2005-09-07 25012, 2005
_mo
well maybe he cant
2005-09-07 25026, 2005
_mo
someone maybe had registerd that name
2005-09-07 25043, 2005
_mo
to change your nick just so you can PM somebody
2005-09-07 25045, 2005
_mo
rude
2005-09-07 25020, 2005
_mo
both mo, mo_ AND mo__ are registred
2005-09-07 25033, 2005
ojnkpjg
don't you have to set umode +6 or something
2005-09-07 25038, 2005
_mo
so its not that _mo stands for emo ;)
2005-09-07 25041, 2005
ojnkpjg
to get private messages from non-registered users
2005-09-07 25044, 2005
_mo
no it works
2005-09-07 25046, 2005
_mo
I tried it
2005-09-07 25047, 2005
ojnkpjg
ok
2005-09-07 25057, 2005
ojnkpjg
i don't understand why that's on by default
2005-09-07 25001, 2005
ojnkpjg
blocking pms
2005-09-07 25004, 2005
_mo
yea
2005-09-07 25005, 2005
dseomn
spam
2005-09-07 25027, 2005
_mo
aperantly *someone* had problems with alot of spam PM's
2005-09-07 25028, 2005
ojnkpjg
that's why they have it, but i don't think it ought to be on by default
2005-09-07 25040, 2005
_mo
I totally agree with ojnkpjg
2005-09-07 25048, 2005
dseomn
me too
2005-09-07 25054, 2005
ojnkpjg
i didn't even realize there was anything like that until it didn't work
2005-09-07 25001, 2005
_mo
its a good idea, but should not be default
2005-09-07 25025, 2005
ojnkpjg
every ircd seems to have its own set of modes
2005-09-07 25035, 2005
_mo
ircd?
2005-09-07 25040, 2005
_mo
IRC'D!
2005-09-07 25040, 2005
ojnkpjg
irc server
2005-09-07 25044, 2005
_mo
:p sorry, injoke
2005-09-07 25059, 2005
_mo
like.. 404'RD!
2005-09-07 25043, 2005
fuchs
_mo: well, if the nick is already registerd, you can kindly asked an an opper to remove it if it's not used in the past 90 days or in case it is used, you will get killed everytime the person who registered the nick comes in ;)
2005-09-07 25058, 2005
_mo
yea I know
2005-09-07 25014, 2005
fuchs
_mo: so the argument doesn't count ;)
2005-09-07 25029, 2005
dseomn
_mo: about that article, one of the stupidest things IMHO is (re)building there, Barbara Bush's was just a silly ignorance thing
2005-09-07 25043, 2005
dseomn
*Bush's comment was
2005-09-07 25015, 2005
dseomn hits MBChatLogger for not telling us not to elect bush
no, only explanation was track times differ to much
2005-09-07 25000, 2005
fuchs
hmm, strange example - the albums seem to be different indeed otherwise you wouldn't have discids that differ that much
2005-09-07 25031, 2005
fuchs
faugn: are you sure it's really the same album?
2005-09-07 25043, 2005
ojnkpjg
i've seen a few cases where totally bogus data came from old freedb discid adds
2005-09-07 25050, 2005
fuchs
faugn: could be that those are two different live recordings
2005-09-07 25004, 2005
ojnkpjg
so you might want to check the mod history
2005-09-07 25018, 2005
faugn
ok
2005-09-07 25055, 2005
faugn
so DiscID is valid, but track times could be bogus?
2005-09-07 25005, 2005
faugn
anyway to correct this?
2005-09-07 25019, 2005
faugn
if that's the problem...
2005-09-07 25046, 2005
ojnkpjg
the track times would come from the first import either from freedb or from a discid add
2005-09-07 25013, 2005
ojnkpjg
if it came from freedb, i might be suspicious
2005-09-07 25014, 2005
fuchs
the discid is invalid as well if the track times are, because the discid is calculated from the track lengths
2005-09-07 25039, 2005
faugn
mmm, yeah
2005-09-07 25016, 2005
ValHallA|SW`gone has quit
2005-09-07 25026, 2005
nikki_ groans
2005-09-07 25029, 2005
nikki_
I'm knackered.
2005-09-07 25058, 2005
ClutchEr2
What if we have a double Album with only one artist on one cd and only one on the other? Is it proper to give one to an Artist and the other to the second or isn't it better to treat them as a VA even with all tracks belonging to one Artist? http://musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=3349412
2005-09-07 25058, 2005
lindestinel has quit
2005-09-07 25049, 2005
lindestinel joined the channel
2005-09-07 25019, 2005
ojnkpjg
what's the point of a various artists album with an identical artist for each track
2005-09-07 25052, 2005
ojnkpjg
if it's just to indicate that there's another disc with work by another composer, i'd just add an annotation
2005-09-07 25021, 2005
ClutchEr2
Yes, in fact, really no use.
2005-09-07 25023, 2005
djce is back (gone 02:40:41)
2005-09-07 25023, 2005
ojnkpjg <- going to see sufjan stevens now
2005-09-07 25024, 2005
ojnkpjg
hooray for me
2005-09-07 25056, 2005
djce
g0llum: so, that committed copy of topmenu works does it?
