was there some discussion about converting roman numbers?
2005-09-19 26250, 2005
luks
and also "Applies to songs that have been split across multiple tracks." - Oxygene is not one song, but 6 completely different songs
2005-09-19 26201, 2005
_mo
afaik. yes on disc # no on volume #
2005-09-19 26227, 2005
_mo
so those are wrong as they are covered by volumenumberstyle
2005-09-19 26205, 2005
_mo
they are probably intentionally roman
2005-09-19 26232, 2005
luks
probably not
2005-09-19 26236, 2005
luks
but...
2005-09-19 26251, 2005
luks
stupid style guidelines :)
2005-09-19 26211, 2005
_mo
is it whats on the cover?
2005-09-19 26215, 2005
luks
yes
2005-09-19 26222, 2005
_mo
then ding
2005-09-19 26239, 2005
_mo
but replace them with , part#
2005-09-19 26250, 2005
_mo
part #
2005-09-19 26214, 2005
luks
yes, and that's what i don't like
2005-09-19 26223, 2005
_mo
hmm!
2005-09-19 26259, 2005
luks
someone could edit PartNumberStyle
2005-09-19 26205, 2005
luks
and remove that "Applies to songs that have been split across multiple tracks."
2005-09-19 26212, 2005
_mo
:p
2005-09-19 26244, 2005
luks
because now oxygene is not covered by PartNumberStyle, imho
2005-09-19 26251, 2005
luks
as it's not one song
2005-09-19 26200, 2005
_mo
you know. thats true
2005-09-19 26206, 2005
_mo
its a song *name*
2005-09-19 26243, 2005
luks
damn, but i can't vote no :p
2005-09-19 26248, 2005
_mo
oh?
2005-09-19 26251, 2005
_mo
I did
2005-09-19 26205, 2005
_mo
bordercases lie kthis is what the voting system is for
2005-09-19 26229, 2005
_mo
go ahead and vote no rightnow thers 2 yes and 1 no
2005-09-19 26238, 2005
luks
problem is, oxygene was released on many compilations with many variations - oxygene 2, oxygene II, oxygene (part 2), ...
2005-09-19 26256, 2005
_mo
then those soudl be changed. not the album ones omho
2005-09-19 26200, 2005
_mo
imho even
2005-09-19 26237, 2005
luks
another problem - oxygen's 1-6 are numbered as "Oxygene (Part #)" and 7-13 as "Oxygene #"
2005-09-19 26207, 2005
_mo
o_O
2005-09-19 26217, 2005
_mo
to bad we cant ask him...
2005-09-19 26230, 2005
Shepard
consistency consistency consistency...
2005-09-19 26238, 2005
_mo
:(
2005-09-19 26250, 2005
luks
i hate it!
2005-09-19 26252, 2005
luks
:p
2005-09-19 26205, 2005
Shepard
on the café del mar albums we also do not care about the covers :)
2005-09-19 26215, 2005
_mo
but I think the roman numerals sould stay
2005-09-19 26228, 2005
_mo
but that are compilations
2005-09-19 26232, 2005
_mo
not albums
2005-09-19 26239, 2005
_mo
they are VA comps even
2005-09-19 26241, 2005
Shepard
so?
2005-09-19 26253, 2005
_mo
makes a huge difference imho
2005-09-19 26215, 2005
Shepard
for the title of the work? not for me
2005-09-19 26248, 2005
eMb joined the channel
2005-09-19 26257, 2005
_mo
i was talking aabout over writing whats on the cover..
2005-09-19 26205, 2005
Shepard
yes
2005-09-19 26249, 2005
_mo
then imho comps are less important than albums
2005-09-19 26246, 2005
Shepard
for the track titles yes, because it is not the artist who decides how they are written on the cover. but not for the album title because that is selected by some mixer dude and no artists intent is to overwrite it
you mean. the two differnt styles are o ntwo different albums?
2005-09-19 26225, 2005
_mo
hmm
2005-09-19 26209, 2005
luks
yes, but oxygene was released in 1978, oxygene 7-13 in 1997
2005-09-19 26223, 2005
_mo
sp? no need to change it then obviusly
2005-09-19 26228, 2005
_mo
wel I wouldn't
2005-09-19 26215, 2005
luks
hm, but they shoud be changed (if it's valid change oxygene (part #) -> oxygene, part #)
2005-09-19 26255, 2005
_mo
why ssould they?
2005-09-19 26219, 2005
luks
what's difference between "oxygene (part 1)" and "oxygene 10"?
2005-09-19 26239, 2005
_mo
two completely differnt songs?
2005-09-19 26253, 2005
luks
yes
2005-09-19 26203, 2005
_mo
so why have the same name format?
2005-09-19 26214, 2005
lilo
[Global Notice] Hi all. John Reeves Hall, a community hacker mentioned here previously, passed away on September 17. ( http://overcode.yak.net/ ) He'll be missed. I know he would want to thank all of you who contributed to his drive for the American Cancer Society.
2005-09-19 26241, 2005
luks
because of PartNumberStyle? they are just a parts without "Part" written on the cover
2005-09-19 26252, 2005
fctk has left the channel
2005-09-19 26228, 2005
_mo
but not accordign to yoursefl, (or me imho) because the 'part' bit is just a fancyname because he was lazy and couldnt coem up with anything
2005-09-19 26235, 2005
_mo
:)
2005-09-19 26253, 2005
luks
:)
2005-09-19 26223, 2005
luks
i hate PartNumberStyle! i hate MB style guidelines!
wih instructions of copying at will and give to people
2005-09-19 26256, 2005
_mo
what's the min amount of peoepl before its booleg?
2005-09-19 26200, 2005
_mo
anyone know? care?
2005-09-19 26204, 2005
luks
imho, it's a bootleg when it's publicly available
2005-09-19 26256, 2005
_mo
good definition
2005-09-19 26253, 2005
juhae
So, does a rare bootleg become something else? ;)
2005-09-19 26219, 2005
_mo
lols
2005-09-19 26222, 2005
_mo
I got one of those
2005-09-19 26226, 2005
_mo
revolutionary!
2005-09-19 26219, 2005
luks has quit
2005-09-19 26259, 2005
tolsen joined the channel
2005-09-19 26200, 2005
ruaok
Shepard, fuchs: seid ihr da?
2005-09-19 26212, 2005
Shepard
ich schon :)
2005-09-19 26218, 2005
ruaok
hi!
2005-09-19 26228, 2005
Shepard
hi
2005-09-19 26234, 2005
ruaok
ich bin da ein bisschen verwirrt von der wahl...
2005-09-19 26242, 2005
Shepard
nicht nur du *g*
2005-09-19 26255, 2005
ruaok
vielleicht koenntest dur mir ein paar fragen beantworten?
2005-09-19 26205, 2005
_mo sighs
2005-09-19 26207, 2005
Shepard
wie fuchs so schön sagte: wir haben's vermasselt
2005-09-19 26209, 2005
Shepard
klar
2005-09-19 26213, 2005
ruaok
lol
2005-09-19 26222, 2005
ruaok
_mo: should we speak english?
2005-09-19 26236, 2005
_mo
no I just wish I understod...
2005-09-19 26246, 2005
ruaok
wikipedia says that the chancellor will be chosen from the strongest party.
2005-09-19 26253, 2005
ruaok
which was CDU, by a margin.
2005-09-19 26255, 2005
_mo
what fuchs scön sagte?
2005-09-19 26206, 2005
ruaok
so no clear chancellor until Oct 6th, at least.
2005-09-19 26209, 2005
_mo
schön
2005-09-19 26217, 2005
ruaok
but why is Merkely getting kicked in the balls so badly?
2005-09-19 26224, 2005
ruaok
so is not out, yet is she?
2005-09-19 26236, 2005
ruaok
s/Merkely/Merkel
2005-09-19 26242, 2005
_mo
atleast norwqays ellection went well ^^
2005-09-19 26245, 2005
ruaok
s/so/she
2005-09-19 26236, 2005
ruaok
_mo: no unprecendented happenings?
2005-09-19 26244, 2005
_mo
what? o I meant
2005-09-19 26251, 2005
_mo
we finally get the red greens again
2005-09-19 26251, 2005
nikki_
moin ruaok!
2005-09-19 26253, 2005
Shepard
from the strongest party.. well the strongest party has the "job" to build a government.. but i think it is possible that this government can be under another cancellor as the candidate of the strongest party
2005-09-19 26255, 2005
_mo
no more of this blue stuff
2005-09-19 26258, 2005
ruaok
moin nikki_.
2005-09-19 26221, 2005
ruaok
and strongest party will be determined after the coalition is built?
2005-09-19 26223, 2005
_mo
hei nikki
2005-09-19 26253, 2005
Shepard
the strongest party i mean is the party with the most votes
2005-09-19 26256, 2005
ruaok
I wonder, what are the rules for building a coalition? Who can say what? Who starts the negotiations?
2005-09-19 26225, 2005
ruaok
ok, so there is no confusion about that -- we just have to wait until all votes are counted to know for sure.
2005-09-19 26232, 2005
ruaok
some time after Oct 6th then.
2005-09-19 26233, 2005
fuchs
ruaok: the chancellor is elected by the parliament, and there she has no majority, because the PDS will never vote for her, but the PDS might vote for Schröder as the lesser evil
