Mutiny: all that bit banging you saw was from the orig pyid3. I didn't write it but I will look at struct to see if it will sufice.... not sure it will
2003-07-17 19802, 2003
yalaforge
icepick: ok, done
2003-07-17 19809, 2003
alus_ has quit
2003-07-17 19813, 2003
icepick
yalaforge: tarball it... and donno... email it to me I guess icepick@icepick.info
2003-07-17 19836, 2003
yalaforge
ok, but promise me you won't give the tags to anyone else
djce (~davide@195.60.9.122) has joined #musicbrainz
2003-07-17 19816, 2003
ruaok
evening djce!
2003-07-17 19808, 2003
djce
hi there
2003-07-17 19801, 2003
ruaok
bad timing. I gotta run to lunch. Back in an hour.
2003-07-17 19806, 2003
ruaok
ruaok is now known as ruaok|lunch
2003-07-17 19814, 2003
djce
:-) np
2003-07-17 19805, 2003
yalaforge is away: football
2003-07-17 19856, 2003
djce is away: I'm busy
2003-07-17 19801, 2003
yalaforge is back (gone 01:01:56)
2003-07-17 19851, 2003
verus
i ran findtags on mine =]
2003-07-17 19816, 2003
verus
2687 tags do you want them icepick
2003-07-17 19834, 2003
icepick
sure... esp if they are raw from the wilds of the internet
2003-07-17 19849, 2003
verus
oh then you wouldn't want them
2003-07-17 19855, 2003
verus
they are tunetaggered onces
2003-07-17 19805, 2003
yalaforge
my tags are pretty boring, hm?
2003-07-17 19808, 2003
icepick
ahh...
2003-07-17 19824, 2003
icepick
I should try tagging with itunes and wmp
2003-07-17 19823, 2003
yalaforge
I've got some with id3v2.2
2003-07-17 19820, 2003
icepick
2.2 tags are my lowest priority... might just write code that will update them to 2.3/2.4 with out allowing write access
2003-07-17 19836, 2003
icepick
but so far I've found less 2.4 tags than 2.4
2003-07-17 19817, 2003
yalaforge
the v2.2 stuff has been encoded by itunes
2003-07-17 19831, 2003
yalaforge
I don't know if itunes still uses 2.2
2003-07-17 19834, 2003
icepick
really ? that's yucky
2003-07-17 19845, 2003
yalaforge
TEN (Encoded by): iTunes v2.0.2
2003-07-17 19859, 2003
yalaforge
that's what your id3v2(1) says
2003-07-17 19834, 2003
icepick
I need to "upgrade" id3v2(1) and make it a python app
2003-07-17 19845, 2003
yalaforge
that would be great
2003-07-17 19801, 2003
yalaforge has quit
2003-07-17 19853, 2003
ruaok|lunch
ruaok|lunch is now known as ruaok
2003-07-17 19806, 2003
ruaok
Wow. I just had a 1.5 hour conversation with our IP lawyer.
2003-07-17 19842, 2003
ruaok
Quite interesting all around. Seems like we're in good shape and now we have some more direction on some of the legal issues that were pending.
2003-07-17 19839, 2003
ruaok
I may not ever get more code written, but at least we're less likely to get sued.
2003-07-17 19812, 2003
djce is back (gone 01:54:17)
2003-07-17 19819, 2003
ruaok
wb
2003-07-17 19850, 2003
ruaok
djce: I have the legal framework/limitations for the copyprotected CD issue in place.
2003-07-17 19854, 2003
djce
the above: good news
2003-07-17 19800, 2003
djce
excellent
2003-07-17 19804, 2003
ruaok
Its time for me to get back to Peter and let him know how to proceed.
2003-07-17 19831, 2003
ruaok
And, as long as we provide a DMCA take down notice and register a take down notice agent with the copyright office, our Arbitraty URL feature should be legally in the clear.
2003-07-17 19853, 2003
ruaok should learn to spell arbitrarrary
2003-07-17 19804, 2003
djce
me too :-)
2003-07-17 19806, 2003
ruaok
I'm jazzed.
2003-07-17 19833, 2003
djce
what does the "register a take down notice agent"... bit mean?
2003-07-17 19859, 2003
djce
Someone has to be a nominated person to enact the removals?
2003-07-17 19818, 2003
ruaok
Yes.
2003-07-17 19836, 2003
djce
That doesn't sound too onerous.
2003-07-17 19849, 2003
ruaok
We will need to pay $25 to the copyright office (US) to register ourselves as a takedown agent.
2003-07-17 19803, 2003
djce
yearly fee?
2003-07-17 19818, 2003
ruaok
In case one of the links violates someone's copyright, that agent would be notified to take down the offending content.
2003-07-17 19823, 2003
icepick
icepick is now known as icepick-away
2003-07-17 19825, 2003
ruaok
once, I believe.
2003-07-17 19800, 2003
ruaok
Then it would be our job to remove the offending link within 24 - 72 hours to be good citizens and not get our asses sued off.
2003-07-17 19800, 2003
djce
Who would be registered? A real person, with a phone number etc? Or an e-mail address or other contact point?
2003-07-17 19815, 2003
ruaok
The former -- I would register myself.
2003-07-17 19830, 2003
ruaok
As an official representative of the MB non-profit.
2003-07-17 19853, 2003
djce
ok, that all sounds cool.
2003-07-17 19807, 2003
ruaok
But, I could turn this around and pass it on to a trusted team of MB experts to address.
2003-07-17 19826, 2003
ruaok
Yes, I'm pleased by this conversation.
2003-07-17 19850, 2003
djce
it's great news, if it allows progress to be made on the .dk front
2003-07-17 19852, 2003
ruaok
He had a lot of positive things to say about our proactive nature to identifying and addressing legal issues.
2003-07-17 19856, 2003
Mutiny
icepick-away: You got my email right?
2003-07-17 19818, 2003
ruaok
djce: it should. I will draft a mail to Peter today.
2003-07-17 19823, 2003
djce
ruaok: self-preservation is a powerful force :-)
2003-07-17 19835, 2003
ruaok
There are a number of emails that I am slacking on.
2003-07-17 19840, 2003
ruaok
Including my report from OSCON.
2003-07-17 19806, 2003
djce
I'm just slacking on code :-( I've not been very productive for the last few weeks, I'm afraid to say.
2003-07-17 19819, 2003
ruaok
You and me both. :-(
2003-07-17 19826, 2003
ruaok
But summer will do that to you.
2003-07-17 19836, 2003
ruaok
Summer is the least productive for me.
2003-07-17 19843, 2003
djce
I think so. I blame summer for all sorts of woes.
2003-07-17 19802, 2003
ruaok
But I'm looking forward to the post BM time -- things quiet down and I get TONS of work done in the fall.
2003-07-17 19828, 2003
djce
BM is September isn't it?
2003-07-17 19830, 2003
ruaok
I'm looking forward to your add moderation note at time of moderation feature.