#musicbrainz

it's grey and easy to miss :)

and not on the right hand side where all the other edit and merge links are ..

yes... i thikn this is becasue the checks. but

yea it's a bit inconsistant :/

but gimme the edit link, i wanna vote for it:)

1 yes :-)

maybe we can entice xplt who was her a while ago to vote as well?

.. is Major_Lurker lurking?

in the dark ..

though i thing it's hella early over there now

yup, anyways good night for all here let me get ready for work tomorrow

\o natta!

yep it's like 6:25 over there

(i mentally guessd 5:25 so that's not bad, just an hour off :O)

madmouser1_: CatQuest: I'm fine with this :)

now we just need 1 more voter and it will close in 2 days instead of wholeweek :)

CatQuest: Wait, don't you have powers to merge the thing automatically?..

erh no? noone has that

:D

[Hm, I thought Autoeditors could do it...]

nei

autoeds are not magic :)

we cannot automerge things

nor can we approve edits we can't do automaticlly ourselves

reosarevok: Community wants MORE MAGIC in MusicBrainz!!!

tull

but sure, get reo here and he cna be the 3rd voter

[BTW, MB's April Fools joke was great (and underrated) :) ]

also this https://beta.musicbrainz.org/edit/41677289

Wait, are they trying to delete Recording's name?..

ikr?

>>"Opened: 2016-11-13" Wow

Is it a bug or?..

hmm, maybe related to https://beta.musicbrainz.org/edit/41802671 ?

that waa also bug

looks like bug to me

reosarevok: I take my words back!

[because it's some black magic]

jajaja

Should I vote against these (something is really wrong going on)?

I'd create a but report more than anything lse

What is the official consensus on "&" vs. "and" in titles?

basically: do as on cover, if the cover /booklet/back of release are all different.. that's difficult :D