Creating the release group first, and when I try to add that discogs URL to it, it says: 'This URL is not allowed for the selected link type, or is incorrectly formatted.'
2017-10-24 29733, 2017
adhawkins
What am I doing wrong?
2017-10-24 29738, 2017
Rotab
release group = discogs master
2017-10-24 29744, 2017
Rotab
release = discogs release
2017-10-24 29729, 2017
adhawkins
Aha, ok. I'll add that URL to the release then. Thanks.
2017-10-24 29744, 2017
yvanzo
Discogs releases with no other version do not have discogs master URLs to link to.
2017-10-24 29756, 2017
adhawkins
On the reverse of the cover. For track 1, it says: "Track 01 - Blue Arctic Danue", then on the next line "10.00pm Session at A30 - Budapest"
2017-10-24 29707, 2017
adhawkins
How should I enter the '10.00pm Session...' info in the release?
2017-10-24 29716, 2017
adhawkins
As a disambiguation for the recording?
2017-10-24 29718, 2017
yvanzo
Is it for this track only?
2017-10-24 29735, 2017
adhawkins
Yes. The second track has a similar annotation. Just trying to upload a photo.
2017-10-24 29700, 2017
yvanzo
Is that the name of an event?
2017-10-24 29708, 2017
Rotab
that track duration on discogs o_O
2017-10-24 29750, 2017
yvanzo
If you cannot get more info on that event (which is the only way to enter 10:00pm for now), an annotation will do.
Or I guess it could be considered part of the track title?
2017-10-24 29708, 2017
MajorLurker joined the channel
2017-10-24 29747, 2017
Darkloke joined the channel
2017-10-24 29719, 2017
Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
2017-10-24 29706, 2017
D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
2017-10-24 29730, 2017
agentsim_ has quit
2017-10-24 29712, 2017
agentsim joined the channel
2017-10-24 29757, 2017
agentsim has quit
2017-10-24 29741, 2017
MajorLurker
Further question to my problem with acoustic ID and Picard above. All the tracks that Picard/AcousticID are not picking up are under 2 minutes in length. Does anybody know why that might be?
2017-10-24 29723, 2017
naught101 joined the channel
2017-10-24 29735, 2017
reosarevok
Hmm. I think generally acoustIDs are 2 minutes long?
2017-10-24 29703, 2017
MajorLurker
SO if the track is less than 2 minutes it does not generate one?
2017-10-24 29730, 2017
MajorLurker
I have only noticed this problem over the last little while.
2017-10-24 29751, 2017
MajorLurker
Maybe I have not had so many short tracks before :)
2017-10-24 29713, 2017
reosarevok
I would expect it to still generate one
2017-10-24 29726, 2017
reosarevok
But that might be where the problem stems from, maybe something broke or I dunno
2017-10-24 29742, 2017
MajorLurker
OK I will throw a bug in and see then....
2017-10-24 29702, 2017
reosarevok
Make Freso open that AcoustID forum category we decided about and then post there :p
2017-10-24 29720, 2017
MajorLurker
Freso, ^^ do that!
2017-10-24 29726, 2017
MajorLurker
please
2017-10-24 29751, 2017
reosarevok
(I would but can't figure out if I have the rights and how to do it)
2017-10-24 29725, 2017
Darkloke
Hi, guys. reosarevok, i need your help again about downvoting. This edit: https://musicbrainz.org/edit/48621417. I made such changes, coz imo track artist should be credited "audiomachine" being as main group/band/production studio, while individual tracks still have composer info. What do you think?
2017-10-24 29747, 2017
Darkloke
[11:05] <Darkloke> I see. Ok, then 2nd question - how should i credit a track artist for this release (and similar) - simply "audiomachine" for all tracks or per composer? I think the 1st one, but not sure.
2017-10-24 29747, 2017
Darkloke
[11:11] <reosarevok> Darkloke: without seeing the tracklist it's hard to know, but I think it makes sense to have it as you did if it does list the composers
2017-10-24 29731, 2017
simukis joined the channel
2017-10-24 29742, 2017
reosarevok comments
2017-10-24 29722, 2017
iliekcomputers__ is now known as iliekcomputers
2017-10-24 29750, 2017
MajorLurker
ok now I thought I made a bug report but I cannot find it now.... ;(
Thanks for the comments, reosarevok, but i am still confused what to do now...
2017-10-24 29720, 2017
MajorLurker
adhawkins, I would have added the dates too
2017-10-24 29721, 2017
reosarevok
Darkloke: fwiw at least the move from various artists to audiomachine seems very reasonable to me and makes the stuff less of a mess
2017-10-24 29734, 2017
adhawkins
MajorLurker: In the annotation? Or the 'recorded' relationship?
2017-10-24 29739, 2017
reosarevok
b)
2017-10-24 29748, 2017
adhawkins
Ok. Will do.
2017-10-24 29750, 2017
MajorLurker
in the relationship
2017-10-24 29717, 2017
reosarevok
Darkloke: the per-track bits, less sure. The digital version should have the composers as artists, as per that page. I don't know how the physical version shows the composers
2017-10-24 29732, 2017
reosarevok
(but it might make sense to leave them be as artists if we don't have more info that they are *not* credited)
2017-10-24 29738, 2017
adhawkins
Should I enter the same date for start and end? Seems a little counter-intuitive.
