hrm. the remove rating script destroys AcoustID page :<
2015-03-24 08343, 2015
d4rkie joined the channel
2015-03-24 08306, 2015
LordSputnik has left the channel
2015-03-24 08316, 2015
Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
2015-03-24 08348, 2015
D4RK-PH0_ joined the channel
2015-03-24 08347, 2015
JoeLlama joined the channel
2015-03-24 08330, 2015
kurros
what would be the best way to clean up a merge that was mistakenly set to append? just marking medium 2 for removal would orphan the track ids, I assume. not sure if that is a concern. http://musicbrainz.org/release/578b7de4-f225-480d…
2015-03-24 08315, 2015
kurros
edit was two weeks ago, too. missed it :/
2015-03-24 08331, 2015
mezod joined the channel
2015-03-24 08337, 2015
kurros
the only disc id is attached to medium 2, too
2015-03-24 08354, 2015
CallerNo6
are track IDs even exposed anywhere?
2015-03-24 08352, 2015
CallerNo6
I guess I could be asking that on devel
2015-03-24 08340, 2015
CallerNo6
It seems like, if trackids aren't exposed anywhere, then merge-rather-than-delete doens't really matter. so it'd be safe to simply more the discid and then remove medium 2.
2015-03-24 08311, 2015
CallerNo6
*if*
2015-03-24 08336, 2015
kurros
well, Picard tags them. i don't know to what extent other things might use it. i think the recording ID is probably more important.
2015-03-24 08334, 2015
JesseW joined the channel
2015-03-24 08358, 2015
CallerNo6
are you sure you're not thinking of recording id?
2015-03-24 08300, 2015
kurros
ah, disc id moving has improved since the last time I did it years ago. easy enough.
2015-03-24 08333, 2015
CallerNo6 opens picard 1.2, doesn't see anything about track id. has that changed?
This time it's a live album with multiple headlining acts
2015-03-24 08306, 2015
reosarevok
7 artists? I'd probably go with VA for that tbh
2015-03-24 08315, 2015
reosarevok
(assuming the list on the left are artists)
2015-03-24 08347, 2015
hibiscuskazenek1
they are
2015-03-24 08359, 2015
hibiscuskazenek1
but the implication with Various Artists is that the release is a compilation
2015-03-24 08306, 2015
hibiscuskazenek1
(and Picard sorts it accodingly)
2015-03-24 08316, 2015
hibiscuskazenek1
accordingly*
2015-03-24 08354, 2015
reosarevok
Dunno, I guess it depends on the definition of "compilation" :)
2015-03-24 08310, 2015
reosarevok
I've added plenty of various artists albums which aren't MB compilations
2015-03-24 08344, 2015
hibiscuskazenek1
The vast majority are (in the sense that the material contained therein was previously released elsewhere or pulled from another source)
2015-03-24 08302, 2015
reosarevok
Dunno. I'd think a VA + Live without compilation is clear enough about it not being a comp (Picard will probably by default add the itunes compilation tag but that's really unrelated)
2015-03-24 08313, 2015
reosarevok
(I wish we'd rename it "thing that iTunes wants because it sucks")
Although it might have the unintended effect of attaching "Remix" to the main single RG, so that should probably be changed if it does get merged
2015-03-24 08335, 2015
reosarevok
I guess the thing is - if that was the original song + the remix it'd clearly be included in the main single RG, so it makes sense to have it there anyway. But I don't think there's a clear consensus for this
2015-03-24 08342, 2015
_5moufl
my thoughts too
2015-03-24 08334, 2015
CatQuest
atleast until we can set release-specific type
2015-03-24 08352, 2015
randybias joined the channel
2015-03-24 08320, 2015
reosarevok
But why is it relevant
2015-03-24 08321, 2015
reosarevok
?
2015-03-24 08328, 2015
reosarevok
Normal singles are full of remixes too most of the time
2015-03-24 08352, 2015
ariscop joined the channel
2015-03-24 08309, 2015
ariscop joined the channel
2015-03-24 08341, 2015
hibiscuskazenek1
The issue is that one single is a remix of the other
2015-03-24 08313, 2015
The_Freso joined the channel
2015-03-24 08357, 2015
CatQuest
reosarevok: well *now* a days sure.. but go back a couple a decades and no such thing
2015-03-24 08335, 2015
CatQuest
making a remix single of a one fo those release.. that would be a different RG.. but again I don't know tis particular case that good either
2015-03-24 08345, 2015
CatQuest
you'll notice I didn't vote on it :)
2015-03-24 08322, 2015
CatQuest
it was more an aside to wanting to be able to set release spesific type i guess
2015-03-24 08359, 2015
The_Freso joined the channel
2015-03-24 08344, 2015
The_Freso joined the channel
2015-03-24 08338, 2015
The_Freso joined the channel
2015-03-24 08306, 2015
arx8 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08327, 2015
arx8 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08355, 2015
arx8 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08349, 2015
hibiscuskazeneko joined the channel
2015-03-24 08325, 2015
arx8 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08332, 2015
STalKer-X
blah ;p
2015-03-24 08353, 2015
arx8 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08356, 2015
arx8 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08318, 2015
arx8 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08320, 2015
Freso joined the channel
2015-03-24 08312, 2015
arx8 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08340, 2015
Gentlecat joined the channel
2015-03-24 08306, 2015
arx8 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08333, 2015
JESUS2099 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08303, 2015
arx8 joined the channel
2015-03-24 08313, 2015
JESUS2099
STalKer-X : « the remove rating script destroys AcoustID page » is it about the HIDE_RATINGS module of my TURBO script ? what AcoustID page is it about ? acoustid.org’s or mb’s ?
2015-03-24 08356, 2015
STalKer-X
JESUS2099 you have one, too? :D
2015-03-24 08322, 2015
JESUS2099
STalKer-X: for « Advanced search by default » you don’t need script… in my browser, typing mr followed by anything, will make a release search that is advanced mode
