Leftmost: you can also say in, not really sure if "auf" would be correct or not in this case. You see "auf" for ships, not sure if that also counts for submarines..
2015-06-14 16537, 2015
JonnyJD
hibiscuskazeneko: lol
2015-06-14 16553, 2015
hibiscuskazeneko
that came to mind from what you guys were saying
2015-06-14 16548, 2015
Freso
ZaphodBeeblebrox: Well, it's "ubåd" in daily speak here too, just like "automobil" is simply "bil".
2015-06-14 16524, 2015
JonnyJD
Freso: in german it is worse, we say "Auto" for Automobil, not that "auto" would make it technically distinct
2015-06-14 16528, 2015
CallerNo6
What /is/ the deal with those beer boots? They always remind me of something my mother used to say. "He's so dumb, he couldn't poor piss out of a boot if the directions were on the sole."
2015-06-14 16534, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
Freso: well that's what I assumed too :P
2015-06-14 16544, 2015
CallerNo6
oops, s/poor/pour/
2015-06-14 16554, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
he's poor in the inteligence levels
2015-06-14 16503, 2015
CallerNo6 deserved taht
2015-06-14 16506, 2015
JonnyJD is afk again
2015-06-14 16507, 2015
CallerNo6
grr
2015-06-14 16508, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
freso, though afaik the "bil" denomination was a result of a vote in amagazin/newspaper for what a the danish word for "car" should be. and "bil" was chosen (from automobil) and was further imported to norway and sweden
2015-06-14 16503, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
while "ubåt/d" is just a simple foreshortening of "undervannsbåt" afaik.
2015-06-14 16552, 2015
Freso
ZaphodBeeblebrox: Just 'cause a word wins a vote in a paper does not mean it automatically gains acceptance in the public daily language.
2015-06-14 16531, 2015
derwin
ZaphodBeeblebrox: lame,bummer.
2015-06-14 16504, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
Freso: urhm.. any what else do we today call cars then?
2015-06-14 16543, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
also I didn't say it was fact, i seem to remember this reading itsomewhere
2015-06-14 16523, 2015
Freso
ZaphodBeeblebrox: I'm not saying we're not using "bil" or that it didn't win some vote in some paper.
2015-06-14 16550, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
ok fine. I'm not saying that it's not possible that people used "automobil" aroudn the time
2015-06-14 16552, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
ok? :)
2015-06-14 16510, 2015
Freso
Just that B) might as well be caused by A) as the other way around.
2015-06-14 16541, 2015
Freso
(That is, people might as well have voted for "bil" since they had already started using that word.)
2015-06-14 16549, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
well it was picked because it was part of "automobil" so
2015-06-14 16501, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
uhm.. oh well oh is that your arugment uh
2015-06-14 16509, 2015
Freso
Part of it anyway.
2015-06-14 16511, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
i thoguht that it was tht people used "automobil"
2015-06-14 16520, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
in anycase
2015-06-14 16522, 2015
Freso
They did way back.
2015-06-14 16524, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
i dag sier vi "bil"
2015-06-14 16538, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
in german bis das "auto"
2015-06-14 16501, 2015
ZaphodBeeblebrox
and the english are speical as usual and use "car"
What should the 'album artist' be for a karaoke compilation of remade songs. legally, the artist is the production company. Should I do [unknown] or 'Various Artists'?
2015-06-14 16552, 2015
hibiscuskazeneko
Probably either [unknown] or [no artist]
2015-06-14 16551, 2015
davygrvy
k,tnks i'll go with [no artist]
2015-06-14 16557, 2015
hibiscuskazeneko
no prob
2015-06-14 16550, 2015
CallerNo6
doesn't [no artist] mean literally that there was no artist?
2015-06-14 16504, 2015
davygrvy
they aren't artists, just paid anonymous employees
2015-06-14 16542, 2015
davygrvy
any attemp to find who played drums would be impossible ;)
2015-06-14 16500, 2015
CallerNo6
that's what [unknown] is for.
2015-06-14 16509, 2015
davygrvy
ok... so for example, sound scapes of running water and waves splashing at the beach fir for [no artist], literally
ok, for some reason dragging the url?tport=8000 over to picard isn't working
2015-06-14 16542, 2015
sleezio
i don't see a green tag on the page either
2015-06-14 16514, 2015
Freso
sleezio: Picard doesn't care about the ?tport=...
2015-06-14 16514, 2015
davygrvy
yeah, just append ?tport=8000 and you're good
2015-06-14 16546, 2015
Freso
sleezio: If Picard isn't getting the releases when you click the green "button", something is off in your system.
2015-06-14 16556, 2015
Freso
Are you using NoScript?
2015-06-14 16500, 2015
sleezio
when i try and drag the url to picar and let go, it just returns back to the browser, it doesn't add the new item in the right panel like it did earlier
2015-06-14 16507, 2015
sleezio
it's disabled
2015-06-14 16541, 2015
Freso
Completely disabled, or just "allow scripts on all sites" or however that goes.
2015-06-14 16549, 2015
sleezio
globally
2015-06-14 16557, 2015
Freso
Yes.
2015-06-14 16530, 2015
Freso
So is it disabled on about:addons or just having scripts allowed globally?
2015-06-14 16547, 2015
Freso
The latter option will still block some non-script things.
