#musicbrainz

blast from the past

ooh, that looks neat

speaking of design, the can no longer look at the mb logo (or most of the proposed new ones) without seeing http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb201404032234...

to be honest, i still think the old site looks... friendlier? somehow.

https://musicbrainz.org/edit/32862685 why is that an auto edit?!

pankkake, I suppose in some sense it could be considered to be sufficiently non-destructive as to be allowable as an auto-edit, though it's not very consistent.

if this is voluntary, it's a bad idea. it's going to be harder to catch mistakes

especially for various artist releases, which are not in subcription emails

sometimes it's a shame there's no autoedit equivalent of a cancel

well yes, fixing/reverting edits is a pain. I can easily vote on mistakes (which are already too many), I can't possibly fix/revert as many

I wish the "add new X" processing in the RE would include a way to recover from a 502 in the popup window :-(

I mostly wish it didn't have to :p

But yeah, those are a pain

if a track is not listed on the back, but the lyrics are in the booklet under a heading "UNTITLED", should the recording be called "Untitled" or "[untitled]"?

Well, it depends if the track is titled "Untitled" or is untitled, so it's up to you based of data you have, in the doubt, ask the artist if possible ;) Similarly i added few tracks titled "Silence" which are not [silence]

502s are driving me mad, 666 would have been a better choice

i would much rather wait a minute for a request to return, than to have this bloody 502

I would think that track would be titled untitled

i've left it as [untitled] for now (was a pre-existing release)

is there any planned support for multi-track-flac-with-embedded-cue-sheet in picard (as in, taking the file and treating its embedded tracks as separate tracks for scanning/lookup purposes)?

not sure if there is any progress towards it..

afaik nothing is planned about that, but you can add a feature request in Picard bugtracker

Heh, fantastic. "Who the hell entered this release? Where the hell did they come up with this information? Oh, I did."

(For some bizarro release of an album for which I can find no other information except what's on the case.)

hahaha

Leftmost, Assume Good Faith!

CallerNo6, I assumed good faith, just that the user was an eejit. Turns out I was right. :-P

As long as you meant well :-)

I did. I even made a note that I wasn't able to find any reliable information on the release, just that I was holding the thing.

That would be a hilarious CotM. Everybody go back through their own edit histories and fix things they did wrong.

I fairly regularly go back through my CDs and correct things when I find them.

And to be fair, I'm not sure I entered anything mistakenly, just with very limited information. (No release status or release date, weird label.)

I'm sure there are things in my edit history that I'd like to do over. And someday I will (he says in presumably good faith).

hey, can I get a transclusion? https://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Style_Council

(as if anybody reads this stuff)

I found a typo!

akk

I fixed a typo!

Now you will never know where it was!

Unless you check the page history.

oh. haha. not my typo.

It was presumably yours, as it was added in your edit.

wtf why is that a wikidoc page to begin with

Oh, it's not :p

oh, yeah, was just gonna say, nevermind. it's not in the transclusion table

sorry transcluder people who have better things to do than listen to me!

haha

Everyone has better things to do than listen to you. *patpat*

okay, busted. I made a typo. That's not the one I was seeing.

anyway, you really should call yourselves The Transcluders.

Which were you seeing? There's also "well informed" versus "well-informed", but that's not necessarily worthy of being called a typo.

"the the proposals"

Ahh.

I'm good at missing those things.

nearly as invisible as "the thing is is, you shouldn't make typos"

Hi, I have set up a MusicBrainz development server, and it seems to be up to date (I can see the message Last replication packet received at 2015-04-30 20:03 UTC on the main page) but I don't see any "update" on the "recent Additions" panel... Is-it normal? Do I have to activate something? Thank you very much...

I have a vague understanding that

edit details or something are not replicated

if I were you I would look at that page on mb.org

and then see if recent ids from a few hours ago are in your replicated db

[21:46] <CallerNo6> That would be a hilarious CotM. Everybody go back through their own edit histories and fix things they did wrong.

XD

Well it seems ok. I can find the 2nd album displayed on mb.org "White Magik" from Deadboy in my own Dev MB server. I just wanted to know if there was something to do to enable the panel to update on my mirror...

And thank you for your answer @Derwin

typhoe: I think the key is that replicating all that edit info is very expensive, or something

but someone else here would know with my detail

jesus2099_ has changed the topic to: Developers: #musicbrainz-devel | Latest Release: http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=2912 | IRC Log: http://chatlogs.musicbrainz.org/

New post: blog: Server update, 2015-04-27 <http://blog.musicbrainz.org/2015/04/30/server-u...;

hum

ugh I finally have some time to edit and what happens? fukken 503s

>__<