Yurim: message the editor portik, he might be able and willing to help :)
2014-07-16 19729, 2014
mat__ joined the channel
2014-07-16 19721, 2014
Freso joined the channel
2014-07-16 19741, 2014
chirlu` has left the channel
2014-07-16 19728, 2014
d4rkie joined the channel
2014-07-16 19751, 2014
gnu_andrew joined the channel
2014-07-16 19734, 2014
DWSR joined the channel
2014-07-16 19746, 2014
DWSR joined the channel
2014-07-16 19700, 2014
STalKer-X_w joined the channel
2014-07-16 19706, 2014
Yurim joined the channel
2014-07-16 19738, 2014
gnu_andrew joined the channel
2014-07-16 19731, 2014
Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
2014-07-16 19742, 2014
d4rkie joined the channel
2014-07-16 19738, 2014
CallerNo6 joined the channel
2014-07-16 19725, 2014
CallerNo6 joined the channel
2014-07-16 19727, 2014
v6lur joined the channel
2014-07-16 19706, 2014
Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
2014-07-16 19732, 2014
CallerNo6 joined the channel
2014-07-16 19723, 2014
CallerNo6 joined the channel
2014-07-16 19702, 2014
gioele joined the channel
2014-07-16 19708, 2014
ruaok joined the channel
2014-07-16 19754, 2014
Diaoul joined the channel
2014-07-16 19741, 2014
jjyy97 joined the channel
2014-07-16 19757, 2014
jjyy97
Hello everyone
2014-07-16 19759, 2014
jjyy97
I'm a bit new to the site, and I'm trying to work out how to add a new collection of songs for the artist Marcus Warner.
2014-07-16 19747, 2014
jjyy97
The issue is that the artist released almost all of his songs as singles, with little to no album organization, and I was sondering how best to represent this?
2014-07-16 19759, 2014
jjyy97
*wondering
2014-07-16 19728, 2014
ianweller
you could add them all as separate releases, and those releases would be marked as singles
2014-07-16 19732, 2014
jjyy97
That's what I was thinking, I was just a little confused as to why it still requested a tracklist when I marked the release as a single.
KillDaBOB: approved the one needed for the merge (the new track add)
2014-07-16 19726, 2014
KillDaBOB
thank you very much
2014-07-16 19742, 2014
reosarevok
Note that you don't need parentheses in disambiguation, the field has them already, so that edit would make it ((Deluxe Edition))
2014-07-16 19716, 2014
KillDaBOB
d’oh.
2014-07-16 19720, 2014
reosarevok
I'd actually make it "deluxe edition" in lowercase, also, since it's more a qualifier than a title (as made obvious by you removing it from the title :p)
2014-07-16 19733, 2014
jesus2099__
ETI
2014-07-16 19744, 2014
reosarevok
Anyway, any other edits there shouldn't block a merge :)
2014-07-16 19712, 2014
KillDaBOB
if i kill Edit #28508991 then it should take care of the disambig with the merge (the release it’s being merged into already has a disambig)
oujs has ? btw the drawabcks i know for oujs and gf are
2014-07-16 19735, 2014
jesus2099
oujs : musicbrainz group is MANUALLY edited (not up to date)
2014-07-16 19715, 2014
jesus2099
gf : replaces downloadURL and updateURL by its own (which is cons if its update fails but pro as it prevents github to be too heavily loaded by update requests)
2014-07-16 19725, 2014
jesus2099
JonnyJD_: the rating of oujs scripts is the amount of favourites ?
2014-07-16 19706, 2014
jesus2099
oujs does not show version history as gf does… those two sites should really merge ! :)
2014-07-16 19728, 2014
jesus2099 going to lunch
2014-07-16 19740, 2014
robmorrissey joined the channel
2014-07-16 19752, 2014
JonnyJD_
jesus (for later) the rating is the average rating of the scripts in the group I think. And the "rating" of a script is actually the number of upvotes for that script.
2014-07-16 19719, 2014
JonnyJD_
and I can't favorite scripts for some reason
2014-07-16 19713, 2014
JonnyJD_
anyways, you can vote/rate for MB scripts, pushing the musicbrainz group from page 2 to page 1 (in the list of groups): https://openuserjs.org/group/musicbrainz
i don't know if this will be the reference website in the future
2014-07-16 19702, 2014
JonnyJD_
xram_: I have seen this website. I have not added it to the list because it is beta, not open-source and the UI/features don't seem as good
2014-07-16 19728, 2014
JonnyJD_
like there is no grouping of scrips available, probably also no github (or similar) integration
2014-07-16 19735, 2014
JonnyJD_
why would tampermonkey need to "support" any repository anyways. Everything is done in web frontends anyways?
2014-07-16 19721, 2014
JonnyJD_
no possibility to use OAuth, the only thing that is good on monkeyguts is the rating, which is a real rating (opposed to the voting system called rating in OUJS)
2014-07-16 19705, 2014
xram_
I agree with you
2014-07-16 19717, 2014
xram_
Was just outlining this, quoting TM : 'Recognize and outline scripts installed from MonkeyGuts'
2014-07-16 19736, 2014
xram_
something not the best featured website wins the competition too
2014-07-16 19705, 2014
xram_
well they also seem to support openuserjs anyway
2014-07-16 19708, 2014
JonnyJD_
puh
2014-07-16 19726, 2014
JonnyJD_
it looks like greasyfork is winning this currently