#musicbrainz

/

      • hawke1
      • 2014-08-25 23719, 2014

      • hawke1
        er…venue, studio, or other?
      • 2014-08-25 23727, 2014

      • kepstin-laptop
        there is enough info on the disc id page to construct a disc id submission url, I thought there was a userscript that could do that.
      • 2014-08-25 23752, 2014

      • CallerNo6
        hawke1: it might not be a music venue, but it's certainly a venue. (repeating myself, I know)
      • 2014-08-25 23722, 2014

      • hawke1
        CallerNo6: It seems to be a music venue now…record label bought it and turned it into such.
      • 2014-08-25 23734, 2014

      • hawke1
        But it wasn’t built as one, which makes me kinda iffy on it
      • 2014-08-25 23759, 2014

      • hawke1
        And assuming the label creates studio recordings there…then it’s also a studio?
      • 2014-08-25 23736, 2014

      • CallerNo6
        ah. (clicking and reading the link helps. i should do that more often)
      • 2014-08-25 23706, 2014

      • hawke1
        :-)
      • 2014-08-25 23714, 2014

      • hawke1
      • 2014-08-25 23759, 2014

      • CallerNo6
        not clear to me if this is primarily a performance space
      • 2014-08-25 23720, 2014

      • hawke1
        There’s at least one live album recorded there, and “1200-seat concert hall” sounds like a performance space to me. But I guess that doesn’t mean it’s “primarily” performance
      • 2014-08-25 23725, 2014

      • gnu_andrew joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23755, 2014

      • hawke1
        uhhhh…https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_(E)m… — “The set was recorded live at Schauburg in Bremen, Germany on July 8, 1994 ” — “Recorded: March 7, 1994”
      • 2014-08-25 23702, 2014

      • CallerNo6
      • 2014-08-25 23736, 2014

      • chirlu`
        Is it original research? They are citing a source, after all.
      • 2014-08-25 23700, 2014

      • chirlu`
        I’d flag it as a non-neutral source, though. :)
      • 2014-08-25 23756, 2014

      • chirlu`
        Original research would be if the editor had been at the recording occasion, so knew the date from own memory.
      • 2014-08-25 23723, 2014

      • CallerNo6
        yeah, I didn't understand that note
      • 2014-08-25 23754, 2014

      • CallerNo6
        how fun would it be if wikipedia had MB-like edit notes? I'd never get around to reading the articles.
      • 2014-08-25 23706, 2014

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23724, 2014

      • mki joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23705, 2014

      • mki
        what happens to the releaseid of merged releases? are they deleted? or does the merge result have two ids then?
      • 2014-08-25 23728, 2014

      • chirlu`
        The latter.
      • 2014-08-25 23746, 2014

      • mki
        thanks.
      • 2014-08-25 23756, 2014

      • mki
        I asked because I want to understand the annotation http://musicbrainz.org/release/35a70166-074b-407d…
      • 2014-08-25 23722, 2014

      • mki
        Seems that some second releaseid (from a merge) is documented in the annotation
      • 2014-08-25 23728, 2014

      • mki
        is there any reason to do so?
      • 2014-08-25 23709, 2014

      • Nebraska joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23750, 2014

      • Lotheric__ joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23731, 2014

      • Lajjla joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23703, 2014

      • hawke joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23750, 2014

      • Freso|koume joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23751, 2014

      • spooky joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23705, 2014

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23705, 2014

      • Lotheric joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23718, 2014

      • srotta joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23725, 2014

      • peaveyman joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23734, 2014

      • LordSputnik joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23748, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        Freso|koume: I always read backlogs ;)
      • 2014-08-25 23713, 2014

      • Freso
        LordSputnik: I thought you might.
      • 2014-08-25 23721, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        do you have a link to the discussion at all perhaps?
      • 2014-08-25 23702, 2014

      • Freso
      • 2014-08-25 23712, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        eurgh
      • 2014-08-25 23718, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        I'll search for it on Google
      • 2014-08-25 23722, 2014

      • Freso
        :)
      • 2014-08-25 23755, 2014

      • xram_ joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23745, 2014

      • hawke2 joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23722, 2014

      • DarkerAudit joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23743, 2014

      • kepstin-laptop__ joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23739, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        Freso: found it
      • 2014-08-25 23729, 2014

      • robmorrissey joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23731, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        I still think that there are data overload issues with CB as it stands
      • 2014-08-25 23713, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        but it is much better than MB for casual read-only usage
      • 2014-08-25 23710, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        and also a really great achievement for a GSoC project :)
      • 2014-08-25 23706, 2014

      • Freso
        Well, CB was pretty much already done by the very first day of official GSoC. Roman really did an outstanding job on that GSoC task this summer. .)
      • 2014-08-25 23707, 2014

      • Freso
        :)
      • 2014-08-25 23732, 2014

      • _Dave_
        So...is there any notion of "original recording" in musicbrainz?
      • 2014-08-25 23742, 2014

      • derwin
        I believe the answer is "no"
      • 2014-08-25 23707, 2014

      • Freso
        Not as it currently stands anyway.
      • 2014-08-25 23729, 2014

      • Freso
        Back when Recordings were new, we had a lot(!) of discussion about how to define them.
      • 2014-08-25 23742, 2014

      • _Dave_
        I'll bet
      • 2014-08-25 23702, 2014

      • Freso
        Some were proponents of it being the actual studio recording, but it ended being mixes.
      • 2014-08-25 23720, 2014

      • Freso
        (Most people were either Recording==a master or Recording==a mix.)
      • 2014-08-25 23731, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        I'm still interested in having Performance and Master entities
      • 2014-08-25 23701, 2014

      • hawke1 wonders what would be meant by 'original recording'. ;-)
      • 2014-08-25 23703, 2014

      • _Dave_
        I figured this would be a difficult idea to express, since humans disagree on it too
      • 2014-08-25 23707, 2014

      • _Dave_
        well
      • 2014-08-25 23726, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        hawke1: you really want to go down this rabbit hole? :P
      • 2014-08-25 23741, 2014

      • _Dave_
        For me, it would be the first time the work(?) (I call that a song) was rendered in a medium for public consumption
      • 2014-08-25 23705, 2014

      • hawke1
        LordSputnik: I’m just not clear what _Dave_ meant by it. So in this case it’s something like 'original release'
      • 2014-08-25 23709, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        so the audio from a track on the original release?
      • 2014-08-25 23717, 2014

      • _Dave_
        *I'm* not clear what I mean by it ;)
      • 2014-08-25 23726, 2014

      • _Dave_
        from an anal perspective of course
      • 2014-08-25 23734, 2014

      • LordSputnik
        the original mastered recording, I guess?
      • 2014-08-25 23742, 2014

      • _Dave_
        yeah
      • 2014-08-25 23745, 2014

      • _Dave_
        that would work
      • 2014-08-25 23705, 2014

      • _Dave_
        there's problems of course
      • 2014-08-25 23708, 2014

      • Freso
        From an anal perspective, I guess it could still easily be a bit muddy...
      • 2014-08-25 23710, 2014

      • hawke1
        _Dave_: Then yes, we have that … kind of. Since all recordings are shared among any masters, the earliest release should contain that recording.
      • 2014-08-25 23714, 2014

      • Freso
        (Sorry... >_>)
      • 2014-08-25 23732, 2014

      • _Dave_
        Oye Como Va was originally done by Tito Puente but common humanity knows the Santana version as original too
      • 2014-08-25 23753, 2014

      • _Dave_
        so when i ask a random person "who did Oye Como Va" they say "Santana"
      • 2014-08-25 23711, 2014

      • _Dave_
        when I ask MusicBrainz, it should say "Tito Puente" (if I ask for original recording)
      • 2014-08-25 23713, 2014

      • hawke1
        _Dave_: So you’re talking more about songs and covers, than about recordings?
      • 2014-08-25 23738, 2014

      • _Dave_
        I had never considered mixes to be relevant data for my purposes, but you are correct there are different mixes
      • 2014-08-25 23744, 2014

      • _Dave_
        and that would confuse things
      • 2014-08-25 23749, 2014

      • _Dave_
        let's see though...I believe the example of "The Lemon Song" would break my definition since that was originally done by Leadbelly but it's commonly known to be done by Led Zeppelin
      • 2014-08-25 23721, 2014

      • Freso
      • 2014-08-25 23735, 2014

      • Freso
        Just because "it is known" does not mean "it is correct".
      • 2014-08-25 23744, 2014

      • Freso
        MusicBrainz is about the latter rather than the former.
      • 2014-08-25 23741, 2014

      • _Dave_
        And I prefer the latter of course...however "what is correct" can confuse an issue with correct but irrelevant data
      • 2014-08-25 23733, 2014

      • _Dave_
        I'm just getting into AcoustID/Musicbrainz tagging ideas and when I do a lookup, there's lots of correct (I presume) information that I don't care about...and I have to sift through it
      • 2014-08-25 23720, 2014

      • derwin
        many songs credited to leadbelly
      • 2014-08-25 23723, 2014

      • derwin
        are in fact [traditional]
      • 2014-08-25 23731, 2014

      • derwin
        so it's even worse for you
      • 2014-08-25 23739, 2014

      • _Dave_
        what is "traditional"?
      • 2014-08-25 23751, 2014

      • derwin
        folk music
      • 2014-08-25 23754, 2014

      • hawke1
        a special case of "unknown" :-)
      • 2014-08-25 23757, 2014

      • _Dave_
        lol
      • 2014-08-25 23711, 2014

      • _Dave_
        how do you know the special case if the general case is unknown?
      • 2014-08-25 23704, 2014

      • Freso
        Works that are the result of multiple, unknown (and most often unknowable) folks - usually be passing the work down in an oral tradition.
      • 2014-08-25 23724, 2014

      • _Dave_
        I see
      • 2014-08-25 23730, 2014

      • Freso <- trad./"folk" musician
      • 2014-08-25 23748, 2014

      • _Dave_
        Yeah, I'm just a jazz player ;)
      • 2014-08-25 23706, 2014

      • _Dave_
        I never got into what was 'folk' since you can't carry a piano too far
      • 2014-08-25 23730, 2014

      • Freso knows plenty of folk pianists
      • 2014-08-25 23712, 2014

      • LordSputnik
      • 2014-08-25 23746, 2014

      • CallerNo7 joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23758, 2014

      • Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23730, 2014

      • Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
      • 2014-08-25 23700, 2014

      • LordSputnik has left the channel