#musicbrainz

/

      • Leftmost
        AlexJFisher, my instinct would be to use the full name as it's given on the case.
      • 2013-08-02 21440, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        Front of case?
      • 2013-08-02 21442, 2013

      • Leftmost
        It's pretty typical that the front of the case just says something like "RACHMANINOV", but the back will say "Sergei Rachmaninov" or the like. Myself, I prefer the latter.
      • 2013-08-02 21457, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        That's exactly how it is in this release.
      • 2013-08-02 21412, 2013

      • Leftmost
        I don't personally like crediting only the last name. I think reosarevok agrees, but I don't think there are any guidelines spelling out what to do in that case.
      • 2013-08-02 21407, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        So, I should probably redo that edit.
      • 2013-08-02 21419, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        and also edit the release artist field too.
      • 2013-08-02 21434, 2013

      • Leftmost
        If it were, say, David Bowie and the case just said "Bowie", I might credit it as such (or see Brian Eno), but it's pretty conventional for classical music.
      • 2013-08-02 21416, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        Oh... Wouldn't you have to show artistic intent to credit David Bowie as just 'Bowie'?
      • 2013-08-02 21429, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Probably, hence "might".
      • 2013-08-02 21413, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        fair enough. Artistic intent not too relevant on a classical compilation though.
      • 2013-08-02 21440, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        Ok, I'll go with 'Sergey Rachmaninov' and try to get reosarevok to pass judgement. He's voted (mostly against!) my edits in the past and has always been helpful.
      • 2013-08-02 21453, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        oh, and always right too! :)
      • 2013-08-02 21417, 2013

      • Leftmost
        He could be considered a resident classical expert.
      • 2013-08-02 21433, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        Excellent. I'd like clarity before I enter a whole load of similar edits. eg to http://musicbrainz.org/release/5f55da9d-b24a-4583…
      • 2013-08-02 21437, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        oh damn. The bloody CD credits Rachmaninov as 'Sergey Rachmaninov' with a 'y'. I guess I should ignore this and use the preferred English spelling?
      • 2013-08-02 21451, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        Time to cancel and redo another edit...
      • 2013-08-02 21411, 2013

      • Leftmost
        I would use the spelling from the case.
      • 2013-08-02 21445, 2013

      • Leftmost
        I have a few releases out there credited to different spellings of Tchaikovsky, for example.
      • 2013-08-02 21417, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        Really? I'd have thought that consistent spelling was best unless there was clear intent.
      • 2013-08-02 21420, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        But, I'm happy to follow the concensus if one can be formed.
      • 2013-08-02 21433, 2013

      • Leftmost
        There aren't always really "preferred" spellings, and if we just wanted consistency there are other ways to achieve it.
      • 2013-08-02 21402, 2013

      • Leftmost
        If people want a consistent English spelling of his name in their tags, they can use picard to choose the English alias.
      • 2013-08-02 21432, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        That's an option I hadn't thought of.
      • 2013-08-02 21420, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        I've already cancelled by last edit, so I'll submit a new one and hope for as much feedback as I can get. I'll go with the 'ei' spelling as that does seem to be favoured for this composer at least.
      • 2013-08-02 21455, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        I won't be offended if you vote against it. promise! :)
      • 2013-08-02 21452, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Link? I'll abstain for now.
      • 2013-08-02 21445, 2013

      • Kabaka joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21433, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
      • 2013-08-02 21413, 2013

      • AlexJFisher
        Leftmost: Thanks for your help. It's *way* too late where I am, so I'm signing off.
      • 2013-08-02 21437, 2013

      • JonnyJD joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21451, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        I think half of my Rachmaninov CDs say "Rachmaninoff". And score books, for that matter.
      • 2013-08-02 21444, 2013

      • Leftmost
        I've never seen any real agreement on his name.
      • 2013-08-02 21457, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        it's a в, not an ф, dammit. XD
      • 2013-08-02 21420, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I've seen agreement. on Рахманинов :P
      • 2013-08-02 21426, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        heh, exactly
      • 2013-08-02 21430, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Nor Tchaikovsky's, save a general (but not universal) settling on Tchaikovsky.
      • 2013-08-02 21449, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        (but usually I see "Rachmaninoff" in releases here
      • 2013-08-02 21452, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        )
      • 2013-08-02 21458, 2013

      • Leftmost
        ianmcorvidae, I'm happy to learn Cyrillic, but you might have trouble convincing others.
      • 2013-08-02 21459, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        (who knows why)
      • 2013-08-02 21453, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        yeah, there *is* that problem :)
      • 2013-08-02 21400, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        'ff' is possibly closer phoenetically, in certain English pronunciations
      • 2013-08-02 21419, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        because people in general are bad at pronouncing unfamiliar languages :D
      • 2013-08-02 21402, 2013

      • Leftmost
        That's because they're unfamiliar. :)
      • 2013-08-02 21416, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Give me an IPA transcription and I'm sure I'll do splendidly!
      • 2013-08-02 21432, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        heh
      • 2013-08-02 21410, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        an IPA transcription of which regional accent, though :D
      • 2013-08-02 21444, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Why, the prestige dialect of course. :-P
      • 2013-08-02 21403, 2013

      • Leftmost
        I can work on the others from there. :-P
      • 2013-08-02 21429, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        http://accent.gmu.edu/ <- awesome example of this
      • 2013-08-02 21428, 2013

      • Leftmost
        You bastard. :|
      • 2013-08-02 21403, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        time-suck warning XD sorry
      • 2013-08-02 21436, 2013

      • Leftmost
        I had things to do in the next year.
      • 2013-08-02 21442, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        heheh
      • 2013-08-02 21453, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        at least I didn't link to tvtr**** :D
      • 2013-08-02 21411, 2013

      • Leftmost
        This may be worse for me.
      • 2013-08-02 21426, 2013

      • CallerNo6 joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21412, 2013

      • kepstin_ joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21429, 2013

      • Kabaka joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21433, 2013

      • STalKer-X_i joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21459, 2013

      • drsaunde joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21448, 2013

      • royale1223 joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21412, 2013

      • derwin
      • 2013-08-02 21413, 2013

      • derwin
        !
      • 2013-08-02 21451, 2013

      • CallerNo6
        derwin, holy crap, somebody actually did it. that's awesomeful.
      • 2013-08-02 21450, 2013

      • derwin
        seriously
      • 2013-08-02 21411, 2013

      • derwin
        wish it was me but lol
      • 2013-08-02 21421, 2013

      • derwin
        they seem to use itunes as meta info db
      • 2013-08-02 21423, 2013

      • derwin
        source of truth
      • 2013-08-02 21432, 2013

      • derwin
        which is a sane business decision.
      • 2013-08-02 21415, 2013

      • CallerNo6
        i wonder if they went for a patent on the mix file idea.
      • 2013-08-02 21415, 2013

      • simukis_ joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21434, 2013

      • royale1223 joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21413, 2013

      • santiissopasse joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21447, 2013

      • Mistah_Darcy joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21420, 2013

      • MistahDarcy joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21447, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        if a tape contains the same recording as a CD, but the tape ends & the recording is cut, does that make the tape track a separate Recording? it's technically not an edit, but the track times are obviously way off
      • 2013-08-02 21431, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        "or a shortened, censored, or otherwise edited version of the same material" I suppose that applies
      • 2013-08-02 21445, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        ^ rec-rec edit AR
      • 2013-08-02 21447, 2013

      • derwin
        yeah
      • 2013-08-02 21457, 2013

      • derwin
        I'd say it's another Recording
      • 2013-08-02 21406, 2013

      • derwin
        but I'm not an expert..
      • 2013-08-02 21431, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        Billy needs to stop over-filling his cassette demos XD
      • 2013-08-02 21428, 2013

      • nikki joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21457, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        wow. just found a scan of a CD bootleg that literally took its tracklist & info straight from my web site XD
      • 2013-08-02 21425, 2013

      • derwin
        haha
      • 2013-08-02 21434, 2013

      • Leftmost
        th1rtyf0ur, how can you tell?
      • 2013-08-02 21451, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
      • 2013-08-02 21410, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        the 'Track info' part is straight from here: http://www.spfc.org/songs-releases/boot.html?boot…
      • 2013-08-02 21429, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        except that spfc has been updated since we now know the title of track 18 XD
      • 2013-08-02 21434, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        other than that, it's a direct copy/paste. lol
      • 2013-08-02 21430, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Ha.
      • 2013-08-02 21458, 2013

      • santiissopasse joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21417, 2013

      • reosarevok joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21441, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        just thought of something. is a song that's never really finished & only released as an instrumental demo, still an 'instrumental' (disamb) & thus shouldn't have 'instrumental recording of' checked?
      • 2013-08-02 21435, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        i.e. should 'instrumental' be on the work disamb., & not in the recording-work AR?
      • 2013-08-02 21420, 2013

      • portik joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21432, 2013

      • nikki
        technically neither :P
      • 2013-08-02 21408, 2013

      • nikki
        you can use no linguistic content as the lyrics language (and we should display that better but...)
      • 2013-08-02 21405, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        should the work be listed as 'song' then? I know it says somewhere not to list instrumentals as 'song' since people don't agree on it...
      • 2013-08-02 21431, 2013

      • nikki
        well, that depends who you ask :P
      • 2013-08-02 21440, 2013

      • nikki just doesn't bother with work types
      • 2013-08-02 21449, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        well, I noticed e.g. the JASRAC importer userscript automatically sets 'Song' & has a button for language (en/ja), and if the JASRAC entry has no lyricist credit it'll enter "instrumental" in the DA comment & won't set 'Song'
      • 2013-08-02 21415, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        so I've been following that "convention", if you can call it that
      • 2013-08-02 21427, 2013

      • nikki
        if one person counts as a convention, sure :P
      • 2013-08-02 21404, 2013

      • reosarevok
        I don't think "instrumental" as disambiguation makes much sense, what is it disambiguating it from and all that
      • 2013-08-02 21413, 2013

      • reosarevok
        But then, I put "video" there for videos so :)
      • 2013-08-02 21415, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        "Use the "instrumental" attribute only for works that have lyrics. For example, East St. Louis Toodle-Oo is a recording of East St. Louis Toodle-Oo, not an instrumental recording, since the work does not include lyrics. "
      • 2013-08-02 21426, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        oh crap. I've been using 'partial' wrong?
      • 2013-08-02 21428, 2013

      • nikki
        reosarevok: on works? :P
      • 2013-08-02 21447, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
      • 2013-08-02 21449, 2013

      • reosarevok
        nikki: I meant that it's abusing the field in the same way so who am I to complain :p
      • 2013-08-02 21452, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        recording-work
      • 2013-08-02 21404, 2013

      • nikki
        reosarevok: the difference is that we have a field/value that means no lyrics, we don't have one for video :P
      • 2013-08-02 21455, 2013

      • nikki
        reosarevok: plus it's hardly uncommon for both a video and non-video version of the song to exist
      • 2013-08-02 21456, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        'Do not use the "partial" attribute if there is a work that corresponds to the recording.' - is this only for Classical works made up of multiple parts? I've been using it for incomplete recordings, i.e. only 'part' of the song is performed, or the recording is cut off somehow...
      • 2013-08-02 21419, 2013

      • reosarevok
        th1rtyf0ur: the only "official" way of marking no lyrics that we have is the language "No linguistic content" - which we should rename to No Lyrics for works
      • 2013-08-02 21439, 2013

      • reosarevok
        And yeah, that use of partial seems right, unless for some reason that cut-off version deserves its own work :p
      • 2013-08-02 21443, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (which seems unlikely)
      • 2013-08-02 21402, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        for popular music, I don't think it ever does
      • 2013-08-02 21441, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        unless the 'partial' bit is a parody work, maybe
      • 2013-08-02 21459, 2013

      • nikki
        I think it could do in some obscure circumstances
      • 2013-08-02 21403, 2013

      • murk_ joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21410, 2013

      • reosarevok
        It does if the artist claims it does :p
      • 2013-08-02 21414, 2013

      • reosarevok
        But apart from that...
      • 2013-08-02 21418, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        like "Ballad of Jimi Hendrix" by MOD. plays 2 bars of Purple Haze & says "You're dead". That's the whole song.
      • 2013-08-02 21456, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        but that's more a work-based on-work AR than a recording-is a partial performance of-work :P
      • 2013-08-02 21459, 2013

      • reosarevok
        That does sound like a different "creative work" to me I guess, yes
      • 2013-08-02 21423, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        or whatever the more-apropriate parody AR is
      • 2013-08-02 21431, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        anyway. back to my original question
      • 2013-08-02 21450, 2013

      • Leftmost
        reosarevok, there was a fellow in here earlier asking about crediting classical artists. I recommended using the spelling on the case, but also directed him to you. http://musicbrainz.org/edit/23159007 and http://musicbrainz.org/edit/23159008 for reference.
      • 2013-08-02 21458, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        there's a bunch of demos that don't have lyrics. in a few cases you can hear some very faint (un-mic'ed) singing in the background, but it's unlikely any real lyrics were ever written/finished
      • 2013-08-02 21443, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        so does the 'use "instrumental" only for works that have lyrics' rule apply?
      • 2013-08-02 21434, 2013

      • mr_maxis joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21420, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Leftmost: oh, yep, just saw they messaged me
      • 2013-08-02 21429, 2013

      • sc-content-1 joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21456, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        or should I not worry about stuff that nit-picky :P
      • 2013-08-02 21428, 2013

      • Leftmost
        I thought I remembered that you preferred full name, but I didn't want to speak for you.
      • 2013-08-02 21440, 2013

      • reosarevok wouldn't worry, but you're certainly not the first one who cares about tiny things
      • 2013-08-02 21458, 2013

      • reosarevok
        We had a months-long argument about whether to put a space before punctuation in Vietnamese or not once :p
      • 2013-08-02 21402, 2013

      • Leftmost
        You're worried about being nit-picky on MB? :-P
      • 2013-08-02 21421, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        heh, ok. i'll stick to making sure all the rec-work ARs match up & merge all these duplicate recordings then :P
      • 2013-08-02 21444, 2013

      • nikki
        reosarevok: years, you mean
      • 2013-08-02 21452, 2013

      • Leftmost
        MB is where the nit-picky go to thrive.
      • 2013-08-02 21413, 2013

      • Schisma__ joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21425, 2013

      • th1rtyf0ur
        MARGH caa error
      • 2013-08-02 21439, 2013

      • zazi joined the channel
      • 2013-08-02 21425, 2013

      • CatQuest
        [09:52] <reosarevok> th1rtyf0ur: the only "official" way of marking no lyrics that we have is the language "No linguistic content" - which we should rename to No Lyrics for works
      • 2013-08-02 21447, 2013

      • CatQuest
        the problem with that is when the thing has singing withotuh lyrics :)