In which way? (apart from that they should be pseudos which is a 5 seconds change I mean)
2013-08-16 22803, 2013
luks
"Higurashi no Naku Koro ni Wiki On the Wiki Wiki Activity Random page Videos Photos Chat Top Content Characters Arcs Community Contribute Watchlist Random page Recent changes Higurashi no Naku Koro ni Kai Image Album Kokoro-Musubi" does look wrong :
2013-08-16 22807, 2013
luks
:)
2013-08-16 22811, 2013
reosarevok
heh
2013-08-16 22829, 2013
reosarevok
Fair enough
2013-08-16 22844, 2013
flamingspinach
ton of cover art on pseudos, apparently some dupes, label relationships, etc.
As a newbie, seems to me that track should be "Eyes Wide Shut"
2013-08-16 22827, 2013
kuno
hawke_1: this particular recording is different from the one on the soundtrack?
2013-08-16 22849, 2013
hawke_1
kuno: Yes, it’s a cover.
2013-08-16 22814, 2013
reosarevok_
whether you remove the Eyes Wide Shut thing or not, I wouldn't rename the recording to the work name
2013-08-16 22816, 2013
kuno
hawke_1: is it licensed for this 100 greatest film themes release, or recorded for it?
2013-08-16 22824, 2013
hawke_1
kuno: Not sure. Silva Screen often features the City of Prague Philharmonic for their releases…it may not have been recorded for it, but…
2013-08-16 22839, 2013
kuno
hawke_1: if the recording is made for this release, it seems more accurate to retain the movie title in the recording.
2013-08-16 22852, 2013
hawke_1
kuno: It seems strange to me, to list a movie title that just happened to use some work.
2013-08-16 22800, 2013
kuno
if it is licensed, I can understand renaming it to something more generic once it is linked to the other releases on which the recording appears.
2013-08-16 22814, 2013
drsaunde joined the channel
2013-08-16 22820, 2013
hawke_1
Like, I wouldn’t ever call a recording “Beethoven - Symphony no. 9 (Ace Ventura Pet Detective)” just because it happened to be used there.
2013-08-16 22859, 2013
hawke_1
If it were the actual recording used in the film I could see it, at least it then has some relation to the film.
2013-08-16 22825, 2013
kuno
but this is recorded in a similar context
2013-08-16 22847, 2013
kuno
(in relation to a knock-off soundtrack greatest hits release)
2013-08-16 22849, 2013
snartal
The Allmusic link seems to agree with you, hawke_1
2013-08-16 22808, 2013
hawke_1
But as is, I think the release is just saying “Waltz from Jazz Suite, the piece that was featured in Eyes Wide Shut” — which is clearly more work-related than recording-related
2013-08-16 22840, 2013
kuno
it would be "the piece that was featured in Eyes Wide Shut" if it was licensed
2013-08-16 22857, 2013
kuno
now it is more "a knock-off recording of music from Eyes Wide Shut which just happens to be this piece"
2013-08-16 22808, 2013
CallerNo6
this is where I'd use my "context" argument. The "Eyes Wide Shut" part makes sense in the context of the tracklist, but is not needed outside it.
2013-08-16 22817, 2013
hawke_1
+1
2013-08-16 22833, 2013
hawke_1
It definitely should be on the tracklist
2013-08-16 22852, 2013
hawke_1
I would actually just call it “Eyes Wide Shut” on the tracklist.
2013-08-16 22803, 2013
kuno
CallerNo6: but it seems wrong to ignore it on the recording if that context affected how the recording was done.
2013-08-16 22835, 2013
kuno
CallerNo6: there are many subtle and non-subtle ways in which a particular recording of a work can differ from other recordigs of that work.
2013-08-16 22818, 2013
kuno
CallerNo6: if this particular recording was performed specifically to be similar to the recording of the work which appears in Eyes Wide Shut, that is a fairly important aspect to the recording.
2013-08-16 22822, 2013
CallerNo6
kuno: I guess what I ask myself is, if this recording were included on another release (where film music wasn't the focus), would it include the film title still?
2013-08-16 22830, 2013
CallerNo6
(but fair point, I can certainly see doing it as you suggest too)
2013-08-16 22839, 2013
snartal
Where is all that extra track title info coming from, anyway?
2013-08-16 22849, 2013
hawke_1
Old soundtrack style, I think.
2013-08-16 22827, 2013
reosarevok__ joined the channel
2013-08-16 22846, 2013
snartal
See, this is where as a newbie, start smacking my head against the desk, cause we just had a discussion that cover art overrules text on sites.
2013-08-16 22808, 2013
hawke_1
:-D
2013-08-16 22852, 2013
hawke_1
snartal: It is useful to have the work titles in the tracks, because then you can relate them to works
2013-08-16 22819, 2013
hawke_1
rather than having to [re-]do the work of tracking down which specific song from the movie it is.
2013-08-16 22802, 2013
hawke_1
And before we had works at all, even more so.
2013-08-16 22826, 2013
snartal
Right, but same could be said for having the movie title there too.
2013-08-16 22828, 2013
CallerNo6
I wonder if there were more detailed liner notes that listed the works.
2013-08-16 22847, 2013
reosarevok__
If not I'd happily drop them from track titles
2013-08-16 22812, 2013
CallerNo6
I know not everybody agrees, but I think the back cover isn't the last word as far as tracklists go.
