#musicbrainz

/

      • Fiff
        Yup
      • 2013-08-11 22330, 2013

      • viper6661
        Some are really asking for it... even if you downvote their edit and explain what's wrong they will tell you to fuck off its just a damn album
      • 2013-08-11 22349, 2013

      • viper6661
        fortunately they get deleted too :)
      • 2013-08-11 22354, 2013

      • Leftmost catches up on subscription edits. What made him think this would be a good idea? :-P
      • 2013-08-11 22357, 2013

      • Fiff
        Some people can't be helped, though.
      • 2013-08-11 22308, 2013

      • Fiff
        I can't even imagine.
      • 2013-08-11 22350, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Oh, only several hundreds of edits to scan over.
      • 2013-08-11 22339, 2013

      • Fiff
        Almost makes me glad I made a new account.
      • 2013-08-11 22314, 2013

      • viper6661
        Only several hundreds? Chickenfeed, try 2k+
      • 2013-08-11 22354, 2013

      • Leftmost
        That's actually more accurate.
      • 2013-08-11 22341, 2013

      • Leftmost
        The ones I'm least happy about are where they've added cover art which applies to some release in the RG, but not to the one in question.
      • 2013-08-11 22310, 2013

      • drsaunde joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22324, 2013

      • Fiff
        ouch
      • 2013-08-11 22315, 2013

      • viper6661
        is it really that hard for some to check the cat# and label...
      • 2013-08-11 22345, 2013

      • Leftmost
        viper6661, in this case, it's almost understandable. One catno and label were the same, but there was a second catno and label.
      • 2013-08-11 22353, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Or in one of the cases, at least.
      • 2013-08-11 22315, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Of course, a bot subsequently saw the UPC in the cover art and entered it. :-P
      • 2013-08-11 22353, 2013

      • viper6661
        hehe automation is not always good with unreliable humans
      • 2013-08-11 22310, 2013

      • Leftmost
        If I had been paying attention to my subscriptions I could have caught it, but oh well.
      • 2013-08-11 22337, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Editing would be so much easier if I wasn't so picky.
      • 2013-08-11 22330, 2013

      • viper6661
        Details are everything
      • 2013-08-11 22316, 2013

      • Fiff
        "If only I listened to more commonplace music..."
      • 2013-08-11 22305, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Commonplace doesn't matter so much. Might make it worse. If only I didn't care if things were correct and consistent.
      • 2013-08-11 22313, 2013

      • viper6661
        I personally changed over 40 cat# of a label just because they didn't include a "dot" so i know what you mean
      • 2013-08-11 22358, 2013

      • drsaunde
        i don't understand, "with" shouldn't be capitalized. especially when used as an artist join phrase
      • 2013-08-11 22303, 2013

      • Leftmost
        It's not an artist join phrase, it's part of a title.
      • 2013-08-11 22316, 2013

      • Leftmost
        And it should be capitalized, because it's not a preposition of three or fewer letters.
      • 2013-08-11 22354, 2013

      • Leftmost
      • 2013-08-11 22312, 2013

      • CallerNo6
        usage guides aren't totally unanimous on the 3-letter limit iirc
      • 2013-08-11 22339, 2013

      • Leftmost
        That guideline is ambiguous as to whether it's only the prepositions listed, but it's unambiguous as to how to capitalize everything but short prepositions, and defines short prepositions unambiguously as well.
      • 2013-08-11 22337, 2013

      • CallerNo6 concedes that the style guide is unambiguous, but thinks the choice of 3 vs 4( or even 5) for the limit was arbitrary.
      • 2013-08-11 22353, 2013

      • Leftmost
        It was. The guideline author says so.
      • 2013-08-11 22309, 2013

      • CallerNo6
        ah. yes. that sounds familiar.
      • 2013-08-11 22354, 2013

      • Leftmost
        I'd actually like to clarify language in that guideline regarding whether the list is exhaustive or not, but I need to feel less like debating on the list will make me smash things.
      • 2013-08-11 22334, 2013

      • CallerNo6
        That's what I like to hear. None of that namby-pamby descriptivist stuff.
      • 2013-08-11 22330, 2013

      • CallerNo6
        Crush your enemies. See them driven before you. Hear the lamentations of their [special friends].
      • 2013-08-11 22346, 2013

      • derwin
        lol
      • 2013-08-11 22356, 2013

      • Leftmost
        Oh, I'm a descriptivist through and through when it comes to language use. But MB isn't about language use. MB is about imposing our worldview on the collection of music data! Forcing the universe to conform to our ideals.
      • 2013-08-11 22310, 2013

      • Leftmost
        We will subjugate reality to our collective will.
      • 2013-08-11 22339, 2013

      • CallerNo6
        That is totally what is best in life.
      • 2013-08-11 22305, 2013

      • Leftmost
        I want to impose this worldview on other media as well. Music isn't enough.
      • 2013-08-11 22348, 2013

      • shardz joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22341, 2013

      • wild_dagger joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22307, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        hi, is there an webmaster of musicbrainz here ?
      • 2013-08-11 22301, 2013

      • Leftmost
        wild_dagger, you're better off asking your question. Someone will probably be able to answer it.
      • 2013-08-11 22343, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        thank you leftmore, i am sorry to report it this, but i can't register on forum of musicbrainz
      • 2013-08-11 22342, 2013

      • derwin
        wild_dagger: what happens when you try?
      • 2013-08-11 22346, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        is it a way to synchronize my account (i am register on dashboard i think
      • 2013-08-11 22310, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        i have a pop up asking me my account (id and password)
      • 2013-08-11 22346, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        (sorry for my poor english)
      • 2013-08-11 22301, 2013

      • warp
        wild_dagger: read the pop up carefully
      • 2013-08-11 22318, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        In order to combat spam registrations, you need to log in to register. Please press your browser's Refresh button, then follow
      • 2013-08-11 22335, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        ,,
      • 2013-08-11 22337, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        ??
      • 2013-08-11 22342, 2013

      • Diaoul joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22348, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        Le site http://forums.musicbrainz.org demande un nom d'utilisateur et un mot de passe. Le site indique : « MusicBrainz Forums Registration - please log in with username 'forums', password 'register' »
      • 2013-08-11 22307, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        I can't connect to register ...
      • 2013-08-11 22301, 2013

      • wild_dagger
      • 2013-08-11 22335, 2013

      • warp
        as it says, you should log in with username 'forums', password 'register'
      • 2013-08-11 22354, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        omg sorry
      • 2013-08-11 22300, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        thank you warp , i don't understand it
      • 2013-08-11 22319, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        it's work fine now
      • 2013-08-11 22324, 2013

      • wild_dagger
        have a good day :)
      • 2013-08-11 22331, 2013

      • warp
        great :)
      • 2013-08-11 22351, 2013

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22317, 2013

      • simukis_ joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22330, 2013

      • reosarevok joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22339, 2013

      • voiceinsideyou joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22324, 2013

      • CatQuest
        flamingspinach: I think it's more that he's been down voted on a HUGE amount of edits http://musicbrainz.org/user/Deleted%20Editor%20%2…
      • 2013-08-11 22332, 2013

      • CatQuest
        with 5 to 10 no's at the very least
      • 2013-08-11 22320, 2013

      • flamingspinach
        he also cancelled an add release edit (out of spite?)
      • 2013-08-11 22352, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Well, he's been downvoted in a huge amount of edits because they were all wrong :p
      • 2013-08-11 22314, 2013

      • CatQuest
        [07:47] <viper6661> those people should be left in an indefinite limited status until they can submit something proper
      • 2013-08-11 22338, 2013

      • CatQuest
        I agree with viper6661 here, a good idea to keep thos in unending limited
      • 2013-08-11 22337, 2013

      • CatQuest
        and "bring back iframe voteing!!" I think remember that reosarevok?
      • 2013-08-11 22303, 2013

      • reosarevok
        heh
      • 2013-08-11 22318, 2013

      • reosarevok
        sadly there's no way to do that unless you're going to have like "elections" for normal editor
      • 2013-08-11 22325, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Which sounds like a chore
      • 2013-08-11 22322, 2013

      • CatQuest
        [08:59] * CallerNo6 concedes that the style guide is unambiguous, but thinks the choice of 3 vs 4( or even 5) for the limit was arbitrary.
      • 2013-08-11 22325, 2013

      • CatQuest agree's
      • 2013-08-11 22344, 2013

      • CatQuest
        always i feel that "with" and "from" should be lower case
      • 2013-08-11 22356, 2013

      • CatQuest
        it just *feels* wrong not to
      • 2013-08-11 22359, 2013

      • CatQuest
        i can't explain it
      • 2013-08-11 22318, 2013

      • CatQuest
        if they are capitalized they just popout, like.. discogs releases that haven't been guess cased
      • 2013-08-11 22322, 2013

      • CatQuest
        to me anyway
      • 2013-08-11 22308, 2013

      • CatQuest
        well I'd not say elections, but if the amount of no-voted and rejected edits towards the anounts of yes-voted/accepted (ignoring autoedits) is over a certan threshold. extent the "limited" status with a new two weeks or something
      • 2013-08-11 22331, 2013

      • ehrgeiz joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22312, 2013

      • outsidecontext joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22303, 2013

      • night199uk joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22305, 2013

      • night199uk joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22340, 2013

      • LordSputnik joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22356, 2013

      • viper6661
        so many [unknown] releases, 30 pages of them... sigh
      • 2013-08-11 22316, 2013

      • reosarevok
        heh
      • 2013-08-11 22325, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Some might need moving to [traditional]
      • 2013-08-11 22329, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Or something like that
      • 2013-08-11 22332, 2013

      • reosarevok
        But yeah
      • 2013-08-11 22317, 2013

      • viper6661
        im sure some of them can be fixed pretty fast as they were probably added out of laziness
      • 2013-08-11 22309, 2013

      • viper6661
        lol some are here because whoever managed to fix them forgot to fix the release group
      • 2013-08-11 22345, 2013

      • reosarevok
        heh, that happens :)
      • 2013-08-11 22352, 2013

      • reosarevok
        At least those are easy to fix
      • 2013-08-11 22306, 2013

      • ehrgeiz joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22357, 2013

      • viper6661
        found an unknown album in 10 seconds with google... grrr
      • 2013-08-11 22326, 2013

      • reosarevok
        heh
      • 2013-08-11 22332, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Added how long ago?
      • 2013-08-11 22337, 2013

      • viper6661
        let me see
      • 2013-08-11 22305, 2013

      • viper6661
        no edit history... huh
      • 2013-08-11 22347, 2013

      • viper6661
        found... added in 2008
      • 2013-08-11 22307, 2013

      • viper6661
        originally Imported from FreeDB country/c30d270e
      • 2013-08-11 22308, 2013

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22355, 2013

      • viper6661
        wonder how this ended up in the unknown bunch http://musicbrainz.org/release/d2031b0b-5086-4192…
      • 2013-08-11 22333, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Well, it says "covered by studio musicians"
      • 2013-08-11 22339, 2013

      • reosarevok
        So performers are unknown indeed
      • 2013-08-11 22346, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Even if the works are not
      • 2013-08-11 22350, 2013

      • viper6661
      • 2013-08-11 22337, 2013

      • viper6661
        this lists the "performers" but some are the composers
      • 2013-08-11 22307, 2013

      • reosarevok
        I think that's mostly the original performers and not the performers here
      • 2013-08-11 22330, 2013

      • reosarevok
        This one seems like it should be unknown, unless someone can get the release and find the right info
      • 2013-08-11 22342, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (but linking it to the appropriate works would be good)
      • 2013-08-11 22348, 2013

      • viper6661
        im on it already
      • 2013-08-11 22358, 2013

      • viper6661
        the songs deserve it
      • 2013-08-11 22319, 2013

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22325, 2013

      • viper6661
        also you were saying about your windshield getting sprayed with oil?
      • 2013-08-11 22340, 2013

      • viper6661
        oh damn wrong tab :/
      • 2013-08-11 22343, 2013

      • viper6661 has left the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22341, 2013

      • snartal
        Am I reading this correctly??? This recording is tagged with karaoke? http://musicbrainz.org/recording/40144a98-0d8f-4e…
      • 2013-08-11 22333, 2013

      • reosarevok
        it is
      • 2013-08-11 22343, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Probably by someone who uses that to mean "I like to sing this in karaoke" :p
      • 2013-08-11 22348, 2013

      • reosarevok
        Or something like that
      • 2013-08-11 22305, 2013

      • Dremora joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22307, 2013

      • snartal
        Do add edits not show up in the history?
      • 2013-08-11 22313, 2013

      • snartal
        add=tag
      • 2013-08-11 22325, 2013

      • Mineo
        there's really no reason for them to appear there - voting on them doesn't make sense and you can even disallow other people from seeing your tags
      • 2013-08-11 22347, 2013

      • _5moufl joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22308, 2013

      • _5moufl joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22320, 2013

      • humid joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22332, 2013

      • _5moufl joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22355, 2013

      • culinko joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22321, 2013

      • simukis_ joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22307, 2013

      • snartal
        So, tags are pretty much the wild west, anything goes.
      • 2013-08-11 22342, 2013

      • HankCorto joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22309, 2013

      • reosarevok joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22333, 2013

      • Dremora joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22350, 2013

      • snartal
        hmmm, even more so, if the taggers out there support folksonomy submission.
      • 2013-08-11 22330, 2013

      • simukis_ joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22320, 2013

      • humid joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22316, 2013

      • snartal
        So, what is the "usage count" counting on a tag? http://musicbrainz.org/artist/b5c2fdfc-d037-45b8-…
      • 2013-08-11 22316, 2013

      • murk_ joined the channel
      • 2013-08-11 22336, 2013

      • reosarevok
        The amount of different people who have used it on that artist
      • 2013-08-11 22341, 2013

      • reosarevok
        (or release or whatever)
      • 2013-08-11 22345, 2013

      • adhawkins-away joined the channel