#musicbrainz

wtf a draw isnt a loss

what happen?

mb or neo?

neo

fuck that

pretty sure i got ripped off with this CD

<_mo> what happen? <- somebody set up us the bomb.

we get signal?

its you.

mo i hate cellblock this is BS

how are you gentlemen

ew cellblock

try something else

i want the trophies for it first

>.<

aha i figured out the trick!

yay!

lol http://www.oralse.cx/

my cat who will eat anything wont eat veggie burgers >.<

lol

there's a lesson, there

we had a cat that eat onion rings

lol mo

the lesson is: my cat isnt a vegetarian

jupp

I think he's on to something

she

that cat, I mean

close enough

;)

alright mrsneil

hahaha

i quite enjoyed my flamecooked soyburgers

@" <- mrsnail

lol

hm fixedsys excelsior doesn't show underline

___

yes it does

but cute

that's an underscore

___

whats underline hen?

underlined text

howd you get an underscore and a " in the same line then?>

impossible

mirc controlcodes

you ned <u></u>

ctrl+u

ekk what are those?

lalalala

lalala

^ ^

lalala

oooh!

not on xchat doh

bold! cool

yeah but fixedsys excelsior doesn't show them here :(

hmmm

weird

fdsfds

f

lll

10omg colour

ok thanks sheppy

can someone explain this? http://musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=3377534 and 3377535

I didn't see it because I have mirc colours and stuff turned off :P

lol

that is a colab not a member of

GURT: it's probably a collaboration

its both

if anything

that's like saying all collaborations are also members

collaborations is wrong

no

why?

collaborators work together

so what's going on there?

dave and tim didn't write anything together

they play trogether

in a group

that is the same

and therefore are members

colab is for thatto

no

if its the same why is there members and colaborations

why is simon and grafunkle members but not collaborators?

because members are more... involved?

hmm

weølll I suppose thats wrogn to then :)

because they're not seen as separate parts

I'd personalyl use colab here to

but maybe not

collaboration should be used for writing

not for two members of a group

why?

because tehy have two different meanings

your meanings are different than my meanings then

your meanings are wrong

maybe *your* meanings are wrong

because your meanings are shared between two different words

grrr

nikki knows more than you

you're saying a collaboration is 2 members in a group

no its two people collaburating

define collaborating

"collaborate: to work jointly with others or together especially in an intellectual endeavor"

a band with only two people has member of

to WORK

dave and tim don't work

they play

yes, perform = work

play = work

all work and no play

work doesn't = play

that makes no sense

neither does having 2 options for the same thing

we keep tellign you :/

i keep telling you

would you prefer if we went back to using feat?

because the collaboration relationship is there so that we don't have to use feat for everything

i wuold prefer that collaboration be used properly

well its not dave featuring tim

its dave and tim

well, it's up for a vote, and people vote how they think it works

2 members of a group of two

or two people collaborating together

what are they collaborating on?

ok, i know someone wants to help me close some open mods

the songs they're performing

no.. thats not what collaboratin means

to YOU it's not

no, to webster

the dictionary definition does not exclude performing together as collaborating

mb defines its own terms

alias isn't really an alias

so what's the big deal

musicbrainz isnt a dictionary

itself

what's a clusterfuck?