#musicbrainz

heh

i wish it was that straightforward here. but it's still pretty easy, especially since ASCAP/BMI have put most everything online

it's been available online for a few years now

how good is musicbrainz at detecting songs?

that's a hell of a hard question :)

:)

what things can cause it not to match?

musicbrainz uses musicip to do that.

musicip.com doesn't provide a lot of information

and they have a system of fingerprinting and full hashin to match.

can someone following this transl(iter)ation AR discussion tell me why "Translation" isn't an option of one of the future release types?

has a lot of info.

BrianG, a little too specific I think. If you have Translation you have to have Transliteration. I think the general consensus is to only add one new release status. Official, bootleg, promotion, -blank-

Kerensky97: what about "Transl(iter)ation"

conservatives!

I think that should be a possibiillty but some people didn't want parenthesis in the word.

Kind of a weak excuse but it could confuse the n00bs.

"what's a virtual release?"

"oh a translation? why didn't you just say so"

and virtual and/or pseudo wont confuse anyone.. heh

But ehy've been called virtual relases in the wiki for the last year or two.

psudo confuses me, I think that one is weird.

and it's been marked as BadTermonology

I think that's the biggest issue with that AR, nobody can agree to a name.

but it wasn't in any part of the documentation though, right?

None are really perfect.

confuse the noobs?! theres been over 100 emails about transliterations, I think whatever you decide, the rest of us will be confused

it was only in the wiki as a propsed something or other

i think calling something what is it is apt for least confusion

Translations have been called alot of things in the wiki.

how about "t9n/t13n" ?

:D

well proposals aren't official anythings and should have the proper terminology applied

i'm going to go eat pseudo food

by that i mean food, but i'm just going to call it somethign else to confuse everyone

Don't you mean virtual food?

:)

maybe i'll feed my elephant

and then walk my car

nikki proposed "alternate titles", that's pretty close. Covers unicode too.

i propose "squish mitten"

I propose Jalalabadi

or Jelly baby

how about "We Don't know what to call it" release

BrianG: Another thing to remember is that this all will be documented in the wiki and help docs. So any answer to a question is "Click the (Help) link next to the edit you're doing!"

Kerensky97: yeah, but that should NOT be an excuse to not call a book a book

from my experience people tend not to read help pages or links

currently the release type/status help links are kinda broken

"alternate titles" is too vague

it can mean anything

and then that means people will start adding anything

and then we'll get tired of making corrections/voting no/explaining

with "alternate titles" does taht mean weezer can finally get it's "green album"?

No matter what we call it people will ask questions, and people will put the wrong things in there. There is no way around that. How straight forward is Offiicial and how often is it abused?

because we're conservative when it comes to adding new release types

no one wants "their furnature moved around"

ruaok: what did he say? "you are doomed!" ? :)

tru: he who?

she?

ruaok: the "pro-bono business advisor"

oh.

Kerensky97: there are plans for {transliteration/translation} tick box when applying the ar right?

no, but he made me realize a few inconsistencies in my thinking. :)

ruaok: that's good.

BrianG: Yes

Kerensky97: has anyone thought that if its ticked for one the release type could list translation if its unticked the release type could be transliteration

but there is a lot of ground to be covered. MB/MeB has become quite complex with lots of history.

its not like saying: we make and sell these widgets.

true.

BrianG: I actually mentioned that on the mailing list, having the AR edit and the release type edit connected. My only reservation was I'm not sure how hard that is to work out on the developer side. And how it would work if the release being edited already had something set (say as a bootleg).

Nobody really responded to it though.

Kerensky97: well the source would stay bootleg, but the translations would automaticly become translation/transliteration on the respective "vitual releases"

..release type

That's what I was thinking too.

But I've never seen an AR that does two edits at once so I'm really hesitant how MB developers would take it.

and what about the releases which have officially been released in more than one language?

does anyone feel that the current RFC or RFV or whaatever is coming too soon?

I think it is a mess and definately needs a lot more thought

BrianG: It's all been debated but nobody was discussing it any more.

has anyone proposing this stuff even discusses it with any of the developers that would implement it?

is AR really the best way to link this stuff?

If the release is in both languages I'd call them both official, the "Original" would be the native language reaalses to avoid clusster issues with the ARs.

does NGS discuss translation/transliteration release at all?

nope, not that I can remember

!+quote <tru> true.

Quote added. (id: 14)

Most all of this has been discussed in the mailing list and wiki for the AR. Not sure about NGS though.

hm? :)

people want to get rid of bootlegs? *shudder*

I'd like to get rid of loads of dodgy bootleg albums and bootleg compilations - especially all those dodgy remix comps and hip hop comps

well lets make pseudo realese first

then get rid off all bootlegs

..

then get star filtering out releases from 3rd world nations

and also releases with a low number of pressings

no one listens to those!

I made my own mix CD of dance music, burned 10 copies and gave it to local clubs. I even printed out CD cover and liner art listing the artists. But when I try to enter it into the database people vote it down because they say it's a home brew CD. It's not! I did it at work on professional CD pressing equipment!

it's still a home made compilation, even if it was produced on professional equipment

But it's been downloaded as a torrent 2000 times and growing! Everybody has my disc!

good for them. if theres one or one million discIDs, so what?

find a better way to display them

i have a large collection of live bootlegs.. you start removing legit discIDs, than MB dosen't work right in programs that load meta data from MB

i'l be a little mad to find i have to keep adding my discIDs to release i've entered

I tend to not remove discids from bootlegs

make bootleg discIDs more fuzzy if you don't want 124823947987 discIDs

I was being facetious. But it's not much different from many bootlegs, including alot of live versions.

BrianG: the trouble with the fuzzy TOC matching, Grace$hit hold a patent on it

i coudl care less how many discIDs a release has, as long as tehy all belong to that release

removing bootlegs to solve an asthetics problem is dumb.

s/dumb/not thought out very well

I'd just like the option to hide them.

i'd like to see it re-organized

ngs

That would be ideal.

where is artist type information used?

besides saying that an artist is a group or a person

or rather, one person or more than one person

which packages (and versions) have i to install that musicbrainz works in amarok 1.4.4

BrianG: I think the discussion was about 'fake' discids on official releases, not about removing discids from bootleg releases

don't have any real pressings but are distributed as CD-Rs?"

but most bootlegs are distributed that way

Haha ruaok, you've seen me drunk before. I'm a nice guy ;)

not drunk. maybe tipsy. :-)

but the water was for hang-over prevention. :)

Nah, 3 beers == me more than done

I'm young, I say "piffle" to hangovers

inhouseuk: i dont understand the point you're trying to make

cheap date -- I miss those days.

BrianG: many bootlegs are distributed on CD-R, there is little point in removing and discids from bootleg releases, unless it is obviously attached to the wrong place

s/and/any

right

someone on the ml is sugguesting the removel of all discIDs on bootlegs that come from CDRs

that is plain stupid

yes

i didn't see where the discussion was about 'fake' discids on official releases, but about removing discids from bootleg releases