#musicbrainz

/

      • Kerensky97 joined the channel
      • 2006-11-16 32022, 2006

      • toxickore joined the channel
      • 2006-11-16 32056, 2006

      • mudcrow
        we need more vocal ARs. I'm up to 16 other vocal ARs on this album
      • 2006-11-16 32025, 2006

      • JaXxon has quit
      • 2006-11-16 32037, 2006

      • JaXxon_ joined the channel
      • 2006-11-16 32026, 2006

      • Synchro joined the channel
      • 2006-11-16 32033, 2006

      • gregf joined the channel
      • 2006-11-16 32056, 2006

      • gregf
        not sure if this is the place to ask about picard but, when i lookup a few of my albums it does not seem to correct the tags on a few songs which i'm assume thats because my tags were right on those ones. The issue is that even though theres no correct to make on those tags i still want picard to rename the files based on the existing tags like it does for the others. Anyway to force this behavior?
      • 2006-11-16 32002, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        luks you there?
      • 2006-11-16 32035, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        luks: I am at the point of building picard-qt now. I run sudo python setup.py build_ext -i
      • 2006-11-16 32051, 2006

      • luks
        yep, i'm here
      • 2006-11-16 32000, 2006

      • luks
        why sudo?
      • 2006-11-16 32006, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        one min
      • 2006-11-16 32010, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        and get an error
      • 2006-11-16 32020, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        ofal/ofa.h
      • 2006-11-16 32022, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        not found
      • 2006-11-16 32024, 2006

      • luks
        you can safely ignore that
      • 2006-11-16 32032, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        ok
      • 2006-11-16 32037, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        will keep going
      • 2006-11-16 32042, 2006

      • luks
        the fingerprinting part is not fully implemented anyway
      • 2006-11-16 32052, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        ahh
      • 2006-11-16 32055, 2006

      • luks
        you can ignore the gstreamer one too
      • 2006-11-16 32005, 2006

      • luks
        you would need to install libofa and gstreamer
      • 2006-11-16 32016, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        i see..
      • 2006-11-16 32025, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        but i can ignore
      • 2006-11-16 32041, 2006

      • Kerensky97
        gregf: right click on the album and choose force savve to see if that changes if from a check-mark to a bar.
      • 2006-11-16 32053, 2006

      • Kerensky97
        *save
      • 2006-11-16 32018, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        ok have it running
      • 2006-11-16 32025, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        I will now check it out
      • 2006-11-16 32033, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        :) Thanks for the help
      • 2006-11-16 32039, 2006

      • luks
        but be careful
      • 2006-11-16 32045, 2006

      • luks
        it's really not a finished app yet
      • 2006-11-16 32048, 2006

      • gregf
        kerensky97: tried that, had the same idea earlier
      • 2006-11-16 32001, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        I will only use it on copies of my music :)
      • 2006-11-16 32044, 2006

      • gregf
        kerensky97: seems to stay blank, no metadata under the id3 on the bottom tab area, butunder the musicbrianz tab all the data seems to be there if it helps
      • 2006-11-16 32051, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        luks: do you use KDE or GNOME? or Other?
      • 2006-11-16 32055, 2006

      • luks
        GNOME
      • 2006-11-16 32005, 2006

      • luks
        and Windows XP :)
      • 2006-11-16 32024, 2006

      • gregf
        theres a smile after that ;)
      • 2006-11-16 32039, 2006

      • gregf
        i usually say it with a :( after
      • 2006-11-16 32009, 2006

      • luks
        well, i'm happy enough with windows
      • 2006-11-16 32027, 2006

      • luks
        but i have a new machine and no free win license
      • 2006-11-16 32033, 2006

      • gregf
        yeah
      • 2006-11-16 32038, 2006

      • luks
        so i installed linux/gnome on it
      • 2006-11-16 32037, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        where is your eclipse installed?
      • 2006-11-16 32006, 2006

      • BrandonLC has quit
      • 2006-11-16 32011, 2006

      • gregf
        kerensky97: yeah when i do force save nothing happens i just double checked
      • 2006-11-16 32029, 2006

      • luks
        uhh, dunno
      • 2006-11-16 32033, 2006

      • luks
        where did the ubuntu package put it
      • 2006-11-16 32042, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        no i mean what machine
      • 2006-11-16 32046, 2006

      • luks
        ah, on both
      • 2006-11-16 32046, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        win or ubuntu
      • 2006-11-16 32031, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        luks: How is the GUI design work done with elcipse and pydev.. no glade or anything like that?
      • 2006-11-16 32022, 2006

      • luks
        qt gui is usually done in the qt designer
      • 2006-11-16 32044, 2006

      • Kerensky97
        gregf: I'm not sure if it's still not allowing you to save, you might want to just wipe the tags completely on the tracks having problems are then add tags from MB.
      • 2006-11-16 32055, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        luks: so the *.ui files are the GUI as output from the designer?
      • 2006-11-16 32028, 2006

      • luks
        yep
      • 2006-11-16 32044, 2006

      • luks
        then they are compiled to a python code
      • 2006-11-16 32034, 2006

      • gregf
        kerensky97: yeah it def tagged the files just not renaming some i'll have to report it as a bug and see what they tell me
      • 2006-11-16 32044, 2006

      • gregf
        kerensky97: thanks though
      • 2006-11-16 32045, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        luks: how is the GUI "hooked" to the python modules? For instance when i click the "add files to tagger" button, which function in which module is executed?
      • 2006-11-16 32015, 2006

      • luks
        JaXxon_: it's based on qt's signal/slot architecture
      • 2006-11-16 32031, 2006

      • luks
        in the code you connect signal clicked() from that button to a function
      • 2006-11-16 32036, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        I am somewhat farmiliar with signals and slots
      • 2006-11-16 32047, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        ok
      • 2006-11-16 32018, 2006

      • luks
        gregf: you mean the files are correctly matched, but picard doesn't rename them?
      • 2006-11-16 32027, 2006

      • mustaqila has quit
      • 2006-11-16 32039, 2006

      • mustaqila_ joined the channel
      • 2006-11-16 32040, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        luks: what plays a bigger role in identifying a track, the known metadata or the content id from musicdns?
      • 2006-11-16 32028, 2006

      • luks
        currently the two are completely separated
      • 2006-11-16 32041, 2006

      • luks
        you can do either metadata loopups or fingerprint lookups
      • 2006-11-16 32002, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        when i choose analyse in picard that is doing a fingerprint?
      • 2006-11-16 32009, 2006

      • luks
        yes
      • 2006-11-16 32023, 2006

      • luks
        and if the puid matches more than one track, it compares also the metadata
      • 2006-11-16 32048, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        Have you ever used foosic?
      • 2006-11-16 32058, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        libFooId
      • 2006-11-16 32036, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        If no puid match occurs, how is a new puid created? Is this only done by musicdns?
      • 2006-11-16 32033, 2006

      • luks
        yes, new puids can be created only by the musicip mixer
      • 2006-11-16 32040, 2006

      • luks
        and no, i haven't used foosic
      • 2006-11-16 32038, 2006

      • luks
        they call it completely free, but the server isn't more then than musicdns...
      • 2006-11-16 32040, 2006

      • gregf has left the channel
      • 2006-11-16 32053, 2006

      • luks
        err, *more free
      • 2006-11-16 32020, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        So the "encode" is "free" but the search algorithim is not ? on both
      • 2006-11-16 32001, 2006

      • luks
        yes
      • 2006-11-16 32046, 2006

      • srotta
        I guess the idea is more that foosic's algorithm is public?
      • 2006-11-16 32050, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        Is musicbrainz one of the bigger tagger site?
      • 2006-11-16 32056, 2006

      • srotta
        And freely usable.
      • 2006-11-16 32005, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        Yea i have looked at the foosic algorithm
      • 2006-11-16 32031, 2006

      • luks
        srotta: the fingerprinting code is free in both solutions
      • 2006-11-16 32040, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        But no where is any discussion about how you would search a collection of bits that represent finger prints
      • 2006-11-16 32048, 2006

      • luks
        the only difference is that foosic is under BSD, libofa is GPL
      • 2006-11-16 32040, 2006

      • srotta
        luks: Oh, I thought the MusicIP algorithm was closed, sorry.
      • 2006-11-16 32002, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        Does anyone know how the music dna (pandora) project works?
      • 2006-11-16 32019, 2006

      • luks
        they manually "tag" each song
      • 2006-11-16 32034, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        wow that's a lot of work
      • 2006-11-16 32038, 2006

      • luks
        yeah
      • 2006-11-16 32055, 2006

      • luks
        but it's also pretty accurate
      • 2006-11-16 32026, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        yea it is
      • 2006-11-16 32048, 2006

      • luks
        far more accurate then fingerprinting or last.fm-like playlists based on users stats
      • 2006-11-16 32055, 2006

      • luks
        *than
      • 2006-11-16 32008, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        Has there been much discussion about how the fingerprint search occurs?
      • 2006-11-16 32012, 2006

      • russ_
        depends how you define "accurate".
      • 2006-11-16 32057, 2006

      • luks
        if i pick one song, i want a playlist that will sound similar
      • 2006-11-16 32046, 2006

      • luks
        not based on bpm, frequency spectrum or statistics, but on the actual music
      • 2006-11-16 32047, 2006

      • russ_
        FWIW, foosic fingerprints have a well-defined difference function
      • 2006-11-16 32004, 2006

      • russ_
        like levenshtein distance
      • 2006-11-16 32033, 2006

      • russ_
        so searching them is viable using dimensionality-reduction and other such trickery
      • 2006-11-16 32045, 2006

      • srotta
        I've tried Pandora a bit, but I'd have to listen too much terrible crap to make it learn I haven't bothered :P
      • 2006-11-16 32023, 2006

      • russ_
        so yes, it is a lot more open than PUID or TRM, in that the fingerprint actually represents the music, and isn't just a reference to the actual location in the server.
      • 2006-11-16 32017, 2006

      • luks
        russ_: i was talking about ofa fingerprints, not puids
      • 2006-11-16 32049, 2006

      • luks
        to use foosic in MB like environment, you would need a server and short IDs anyway
      • 2006-11-16 32054, 2006

      • russ_
        true
      • 2006-11-16 32034, 2006

      • russ_
        but the MusicIP central server is not open-source either
      • 2006-11-16 32043, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        but then the client could create the foosics
      • 2006-11-16 32037, 2006

      • luks
        yes, it isn't open source. but at least there is one, and it works
      • 2006-11-16 32021, 2006

      • luks
        foosic is a one-man project, afaik
      • 2006-11-16 32005, 2006

      • ruaok wakes up and pokes his head in
      • 2006-11-16 32009, 2006

      • ruaok
        moin kids!
      • 2006-11-16 32018, 2006

      • luks
        moin
      • 2006-11-16 32034, 2006

      • ruaok
        luks: :-)
      • 2006-11-16 32048, 2006

      • ruaok
        russ_: did you ever setup the mayhemchaos account?
      • 2006-11-16 32058, 2006

      • ruaok
        or just the mayhem account? :-)
      • 2006-11-16 32007, 2006

      • russ_
        WRT Pandora: we think that describing music through listening similarities is a lot better in the long term than describing music by an arbitrary number of arbitrary characteristics (Ambiguous vocals, wtf)
      • 2006-11-16 32018, 2006

      • russ_
        mayhemchaos is a subscriber, yes
      • 2006-11-16 32041, 2006

      • luks
        russ_: the problem is that people listen to crap :)
      • 2006-11-16 32001, 2006

      • russ_
        russ_ is now known as Russss
      • 2006-11-16 32003, 2006

      • luks
        the tag radios would be cool, but again people don't use them correctly
      • 2006-11-16 32036, 2006

      • Russss
        they can be improved by tweaking our algorithms, we aren't anywhere near doing that well.
      • 2006-11-16 32038, 2006

      • luks
        it isn't that rare to hear metallica when you listen to a "hip-hop" tag station
      • 2006-11-16 32005, 2006

      • luks
        which what makes it unusable :/
      • 2006-11-16 32028, 2006

      • luks
        and there is too few genre specific tags
      • 2006-11-16 32004, 2006

      • Russss
        we have an algorithm which tries to work out if users tagged stuff maliciously, unfortunately it still sucks
      • 2006-11-16 32017, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        Is there nothing that we can tell about the "style" of music from its analog wave form?
      • 2006-11-16 32041, 2006

      • Russss
        yes, lots
      • 2006-11-16 32057, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        Is anyone working on anything like that Russss
      • 2006-11-16 32019, 2006

      • Russss
        yes, we have a whole one-man department working on fun things like that.
      • 2006-11-16 32025, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        :)
      • 2006-11-16 32031, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        Are you that man?
      • 2006-11-16 32041, 2006

      • Russss
        god no
      • 2006-11-16 32052, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        who is?
      • 2006-11-16 32026, 2006

      • Russss
        we have a music research guy
      • 2006-11-16 32035, 2006

      • JaXxon_
        at mb?
      • 2006-11-16 32048, 2006

      • Russss
        at last.fm
      • 2006-11-16 32050, 2006

      • Russss
      • 2006-11-16 32057, 2006

      • Russss
        there's some light reading
      • 2006-11-16 32018, 2006

      • Russss
        it was the winning paper in the 2005 MIREX genre classification competition
      • 2006-11-16 32028, 2006

      • tru
        Russss: you are the last.fm guy right?
      • 2006-11-16 32030, 2006

      • Russss
        yes.
      • 2006-11-16 32043, 2006

      • Russss
        check the hostmask ;)
      • 2006-11-16 32017, 2006

      • Russss
        although someone took away my lovely reverse-DNS and gave me a freenode cloak :P