aCiD2: no, I mean that mb_server has inherited a lot of stupid things over the time
aCiD2: I can think of 4 ways to convert an album to VA
Freso
The 2007 mixtape is, unfortunately, not as well documented with regards to artists as the 2008 was/is. :/
luks
aCiD2: just implementing one that covers most cases (the release editor) would be my priority
aCiD2
Oh, I see what you mean
maybe I'll take a step away from the edit types tomorrow, and do more refactoring work
Freso
Refactoring == <3
aCiD2
also need to work out how to test this framework
Muzzz
monkeys
lots f them
aCiD2 hires Muzzz for 0.00/per hour
aCiD2
80 hours a week
Muzzz
10 dorrar
Vlet
Hey folks, I'm playing around with the xml feed, and despite having read TracksWithMultipleArtists, I just want to verify that a <track> will never have more than one <artist> .. yes?
luks
for now that's correct
but never say never :)
Freso
<3 to whomever makes it possible for a track to have more than one artist! (So we can clear up in the "Foo & Bar" artists...)
Vlet
That sounds like a hint towards future MB schema having more than one artists/track ;)
aCiD2
luks: on a more general level, I know SoC finished and you probably haven't followed much of my work... but do you think I'm still going in the right direction?
ie, copying and rewriting features from the MusicBrainz site into my site
tesseracter__ joined the channel
luks
Vlet: it would involve more than adding <artist> entries, so yes, you can be sure that with the current XML schema there will be only one
Vlet
Thanks; for now, my parser will rely on that, but I think I may wipe my artist field and create a track_artists table for my application ;)
luks
aCiD2: I don't agree with that completely
aCiD2
feel free to expand :)
luks
aCiD2: as I said, there is a lot of things wrong, duplicated, etc.
aCiD2
i know
I've been changing some of that (like returning objects instead of ids and stuff)
luks
so I don't see the point in implementing those
I mean more on the UI level
aCiD2
oh, at the user level, right
luks
porting things at the code level is probably the best way to go
but I'd reduce the user side to the required minimum
aCiD2
mostly what I'm doing, but I do need a usable interface by january ;)
ok
luks
which is exactly the reason why you shouldn't implement all that
aCiD2
yup
i think the only important ones I need now are "Edit All Tracks" and "Edit Release Events", then I'm pretty much done on this section
Husio_ has left the channel
tesseracter joined the channel
milosz has quit
CatCat
[17:10] Freso<3 to whomever makes it possible for a track to have more than one artist! (So we can clear up in the "Foo & Bar" artists...)
you can get barcodes from amazon, but it's somewhat more convoluted
Freso has quit
zeno_
ok one last q: what script is this? 森 オッサン チョイチョイ キリキリまい
FauxFaux
Foriegn.
Kanji, right?
Wizzcat
yep
milosz
yeah
zeno_
so han (kanji) or kanja/kana?
^^remili1^^
kanji/kana
zeno_
cool thx
jcazevedo
jcazevedo has joined #MusicBrainz
Wizzcat wishes there was stat graph for editors
inhouseuk
what sort of stats?
Wizzcat
you know, edits over a certain period, what kind of edits, etc.
just thinking about it while looking at cord, would save me having to randomly parse his edit log :p
plus it'd be fun for my own sake
^^remili1^^
^^remili1^^ is now known as ^^remilia^^
inhouseuk
you'd require the moderations tables (which are large), but it'd be fairly easy to produce a report
Wizzcat
one more thing I don't have any time to actually code, oh well :|
inhouseuk knows how that feels!
FauxFaux
Stats are pretty.
Wizzcat
we'll see if I ever manage to install mbz locally, tried it the other day but the instructinos were cryptic to say the least
perl deps all over the floor
FauxFaux
inhouseuk: Iirc the moderation data isn't replecated, either.
Replicated.
Wizzcat: I managed it, can't be that hard.
Or you could download the vm. :)
zeno_ has quit
LotR
Wizzcat: just don't install the website and it's easy :)
FauxFaux
That's true.
inhouseuk
FauxFaux: correct, they arn't replicated
Wizzcat
so it's plain impossible? duh
or I guess I could make fake edits by myself :p
FauxFaux
Well, you could rape bandwidth and re-import every night. :p
Or you could write the code and get it committed.
LotR
Wizzcat: you can still code against the slightly-out-of-date snapshot
Wizzcat
oh you mean I can download it just not update?
inhouseuk
yup
Wizzcat
cause I don't care about that bit
LotR
FauxFaux: heh, the b/w raping briefly crossed my mind ;)
FauxFaux
Well, you do, if you want current stats. I mean, you can't host it yourself and use serious languages.
zeno_ joined the channel
nikki
I still think the moderation data should be split into smaller files... there's no point redownloading data from several years ago because it never changes
FauxFaux was going to do some stuff tonight. ¬_¬
FauxFaux
Sharding.
nikki: Heh, can you resume the download?
LotR
also, I don't think it's that hard to fake part of the moderation data by analyzing the replication packets. not votes and stuff, but what gets changed when at least
Well, you may need to drop the last meg or so to get the synch right.
FauxFaux goes to test.
LotR
FauxFaux: but it's a tarball with replication packet type files in it, no? the individual files grow, and you could resume that, but when they're in a tarball, not everything gets added to the end
FauxFaux
Ah, I assumed it was just one big file single table.
LotR
the replication packets at least have two files that both have part of the data for each update
FauxFaux
Bah.
ruaok joined the channel
LotR
FauxFaux: can you import the moderation tables seperately from the other tables?
FauxFaux
I never understood the database import, I'm just so fucking happy when it's worked and I never want to see it again.
LotR
hehe
inhouseuk laughs
did you have that much trouble with it?
nikki
I think you can...
nikki hasn't imported for months and months though
FauxFaux
Yes, yes I did. :p
inhouseuk
I believe the db snapshots are very similar to sql COPY output
LotR will wait with trying to import the moderation till he started actual coding on the other stuff he's thinking about
I think I need to write to the authors of ExpressRip. They're sending a large number of useless requests to the freedb gateway