#musicbrainz

:o But it's the browser you use

it's opera?

oh,

Yes

Windows though.

well there you go, you can configure opera ad finitum to look almost completely unlike

oh yea, now i see it

Thats the default look :p

loi

Wooohooo! I got the job transfer! I still have a job!

cool!

that must be a relief

nice, Kerensky97

Yeah. It's not as nice and I think I get a $1 an hour pay cut; but right now I just don't want to be unemployed.

oh yea, that would suck

good thinking...

and especially at this time

I still have some debts hanging over me right now so I need steady income.

:D

gah. why does cmd-h keep breaking on me :/

"Mysteries of the Moose"

what a great documentary name

so, dexter season two is done :)

pronik` is now known as pronik

navap: ping

Pong

can you please give me edit privs on the spreadsheet from yesterday?

rob@ ?

rob @ mu.. brz dot org

:-)

Sent

thx

there's too little CSG talk here lately

"Water Music" Suite No. [...] or Water Music Suite No. [...] ?

stillLotR is now known as LotR

that's like going

Symphony No. 2 "Ressurection"

isn't it?

so I would do quotes

xlotlu: I think that's cause we finally have 99.9% of things worked out :)

heh

brianfreud: i bet you don't have haendel figured out :)

:P

alastairp: it's 3 suites, known together as the "water music"

xlotlu: It's actually in CSG-works, specifically cause you mentioned that case last year :)

hmm, maybe Suite "Water Music" No. 3

call me the cornercaser

or Suite No. 3 "Water Music"?

that doesn't make sense... you'll have Suite No. 1 "Water Music", and 2 and 3

oh

the first watermusic suite

not the first suite, which was watermusic

i think i put alastairp in an endless loop

bzzt

now only if i could find that damned cd...

navap: in the spreadsheet, how do you set cells to be comma separated?

numbers in cells be comma sep?

Click the 123 button

Set it to rounded

hm, this is probably a bad idea: calling_package = inspect.stack()[3][4][0].split ()[1]

oh. rounded to int. got it.

navap: thanks for doing the leg work on this.

No problem :)

if you check out the spreadsheet now, its organized the way I want to present it.

Still need the monthes in red?

xlotlu: I like Water Music S. No. ...

those are the ones where I fudged the numbers.

so I want to leave those in red as a reminder

ah

symphonick: i was just hitting "add release" :)

:)

ruaok: You can publish it, or export it as html if you want to use the table as is.

And you can delete the hit/hour data if you want, that was just me being bored.

brb

i wish i could mark a couple of artists for possible dupes

but what i'd really like is saving an unfinished edit and coming back to it later...

adding a release is soooooo ungodly time consuming :/

xlotlu: Really?

Just titles, release artist.

Are you including ARs?

"Just titles", hey pbryan we're dealing with CSG here! ;-)

Oh, well, CSG is a different matter entirely.

Getting CSG right is soooooo ungodly time consuming :/

;)

I have so many titles I haven't added because CSG is so difficult.

me too

doing the same 20 checkboxes over and over for 5 artists sucks

ok, i'll do a javascript:void(select_all_checkboxes(where x > 5)) in the address bar.. but it still isn't funny

i want to open the track listing, draw an ellipsis around the 20 checkboxes, and search for/add the artists on the right side without leaving the page

.. and then select the AR type for each ofthem

ok, navap: you get to hear the numbers first.

Oh good, when is it ready?

ooh goodie

before or after NGS? :-(

in 2006 it cost us $17.56, 2007 $17.89 and 2008 $16.21 to serve out 1M "hits"

2007 was slightly more expensive, but 2008 much better.

even though we spent $9k for hardware

so, if our cost per 1M is going down, then hardware expenditures are justified.

and appropriate. :)

Good to hear

Simple calculation based on elapsed time?

And hits during time?

for web service hits, we were: $30.58, $33.58, $26.58

if only you could reduce the hits neeed to add a classical releas from 15 to 1... :)

pbryan: that's taking all the hits and deviding it by the amount of money spent operating the site.

Okay.

its inteded as a general metric of how expensive it its to host the site.

So, if WS were to get more popular than web site, their prices would be lower.

and how "efficient" we're doing it.

yep.

as we saw in 2008

I'm generally quite happy with those figures.

So, now you need to let me sponsor the first 1M hits per month. ;)

This hit, brought to you by: ________.

it shows that in 2007 we've had a little too much capacity, but in 2008 we were hitting the mark.

:-)

haha I'll get the second 1M

It shows you had higher expenditure.

it doesn't show capacity, but the ratio of hits vs capacity.

yes, higher expenditure, but even higher traffic.

which justifies expenditure.

let me start compiling the annual report blog post.

hey xlotlu, perhaps you can settle an argument?

with a modic fee for legal counsel, of course :)

:)

I could pay in chocolate, but it of course depends on what your verdict will be ;-)

OK xlotlu, here

's the deal:

Oh boy...I'm getting modbot spam again

And coincedently, its again edits envolving you ojnkpjg :p