a lot of the relationship names are different from the link phrases, and I haven't fixed some of them
hawke_
k
bitmap
should it just be "chamber orchestra"?
hawke_
If you want it to be the same as the relationships page, yeah.
kepstin
hawke_: the issue is that the webservice doesn't provide the link text - only a sort of identifier string for each relation. So the script has to know about the different types to get the wording right.
hawke_
kepstin: nod.
bitmap: Second thing: hitting “show relationships at bottom” doesn’t remove them from inline, and hitting “show relationships inline” keeps duplicating them inline.
kepstin notes that it used to clear them, but in the copy he has, he manually disabled that because it conflicted with jesus2099's isrc/puid script.
bitmap
I can't reproduce that in any browser I have installed
hawke_: what browser are you using?
hawke_
bitmap: Chromium 12.0.742.91 (87961) Ubuntu 11.04
bitmap
worksforme in chromium 14.0.797.0 (89636)
hawke_
heh
bitmap
maybe you have duplicate copies of the script installed ;)
(it's happened to me before)
hawke_
Nope.
bitmap
hmm
hawke_
I do have: Show full annotation., Easier work merging, Batch-add "performance of" relationships, and jesus2099’s Inline PUID+ISRC and duplicate finder (all browsers)
bitmap
maybe the PUID+ISRC script is conflicting with it
hawke_
bitmap: Yup, that’s it.
bitmap
ah
I thought I already fixed a conflict with that :/
hawke_
bitmap: Maybe you did and another one cropped up. :-)
Oh, one more thing: Would it be feasible to have that script show the relations at the RG level?
bitmap
what kind of relations?
hawke_
Well…at least the release-level relations, but really all relations would be nice.
The problem I’m trying to solve is that you have to drill down to the track level from a release group to find any of the performers.
bitmap
release-level relations for every release?
it's possible, it would require a request for each release though
bitmap: The problem is that currently, if I have a well-known classical piece like Vivaldi’s “The Four Seasons”, and I want to clean up the release group list so that the performer(s) are in comments…
…In order to find out if there are any performers, and what those performers may be, I have to go from the search, to the RG, to a release (hoping they’re all the same enough), to a random track on the recording (hoping I pick a track that has a performer AR)
bitmap
hawke_: yeah, I can see why it would be useful. I can look into it
hawke_
The script helps in that I only have to go from search to RG to a random release, in hopes that they’re all the same…but being able to look at the release group alone and see immediately if there are any performers would be helpful
I understand that it would generate a lot of requests though, and why that would be undesirable
bitmap
hawke_: what if a small button was added next to each release, allowing you to expand the relationships for a specific one?
hawke_
What, have an inline display for each release? That would work nicely.
bitmap
yes, I suppose so
hawke_
(I assume that’s what you mean by “expand the relationships”
bitmap
basically just display them under the release you request them for
hawke_
right
Speaking of placing buttons next to releases and such…it would be pretty cool to have a script that added an icon next to any track that had an associated work.
bitmap
my script shows associated works already, or do you mean just the icon?
hawke_
er…which script?
derwin
does anyone have a script that, if the release has a discogs relationship, will relate the discogs release "master" to the release group?
bitmap
the relationships script we were just talking about ;)
it shows "performance of" relationships
derwin: I don't know of any
hawke_
bitmap: Ah, I see. I think an icon would be nice, because the “performance of” tends to get mixed in with the other relations
also because an icon would go nicely with “show relations at bottom”
derwin
bitmap, given what you know of such things, seem tractable?
bitmap
hawke_: I could probably sort them so they don't get mixed in as much
derwin: how would the script work? add the master URL automatically while you're adding a release-level URL?
derwin
yeah, something like that
basically, I tend to add releases, and associate the discogs url, but I do not want to click up to the release group and hunt around for the discogs url
but it's always 1:1
(I think?)
hawke_
bitmap: That might work, though I still think icons would be nicer for the quick “at a glance” view of which tracks need to have associated works. But, it’s your script so I won’t feel bad if you say “no”. :-)
bitmap
it could probably be done in two requests
hawke_: maybe once an icon for works is created :)
(there's a ticket for it)
aeontech joined the channel
hawke_
bitmap: What, the simple divided purple/orange square (as used on any work page) doesn’t scream “Work” to you?
bitmap
lol
never even noticed it until now
hawke_
Voted for the work icon ticket, though
bitmap
I could probably scale that one down for now
hawke_
Could also be good to put on an artist’s recordings page — might be a better thing for a different script though, to avoid the one growing too many features.
bitmap
well, my other script can already show associated works on recording pages (but no icon)
it waits a second between requesting each one though, so it's rather slow
hawke_ is out, bbl
derwin
bitmap are your scripts in pythonm/
?
bitmap
derwin: the browser scripts?
derwin
I see, javascript
bitmap
yes
derwin
I'd also like to auto-associate the releae with the url from discogs as I import, hehe
