#musicbrainz

Yep

no, he's just finally getting round to getting some proper furniture

cool

hawke_1: yep

luks_: Just wondering if you had any idea what was up with the musicbrainz/acoustID integration userscript…

luks_: and/or if you saw the issue I entered in github about it

I saw the issue, but didn't have much time to look at it yet

can anyone tell me if http://musicbrainz.org/url/02bd45b2-f1b3-45bc-9... is correct? I just get "We're sorry, the document you requested is not available in your country." so I have no idea what it is

US-only

nikki: The angryfolk band…

I think

“The Angryfolk Band does not exist. It is the name used for anything produced from the creative efforts of the Angryfolk.com studio.”

Should we be linking to region-locked shit?

There is one song available for purchase

reosarevok: No opinion on that.

This web store is retarded though…

purchase one track for $0.49, or the entire album of one track for $0.99!

I’ll be getting right on that

lol

If you were a true completist, you'd do it.

Cola can for 33 cents! Special offer, get 3 for 1€!

uk supermarkets love offers like that

not that they admit it when people who can do maths complain

I've seen coke can 6-packs for more than the price of 6 cans in dutch supermarkets.

I assume that sort of stuff happens everywhere.

the whole is more than the sum of the parts?

[22:05] reosarevokShould we be linking to region-locked shit?

@I say NO

if 90% of the countries i nthe world can't accsess it, what's the point?

is that right? http://musicbrainz.org/edit/17035230 (didn't we have a separate last.fm ulr now)

url even

we don't have a separate type for last.fm, no

hmm

but we allow linking now?

hmm.

well, it does have tracks that they've apparently posted.

AHAHA i tried 11.67on the intel just now

yea i'm not updating

no

tried dragging tabs between windows, no crashing, but it auto stacks

it's bad enough how 10.60 starts printing when i use "preview"

atleast 10.10 doesn't do that

and i tried 12 alpha!

uh, so the skins are going away and now there are "themes" yea, i have no use ofr colourful backround images, i want icons that are not jsut grey on grey os i cant tell them apart

but apperantly can't has

hopefully it might be better

AND WHY FOES OPERA.COM SHOW ME JAPANESE WHEN I CHOSE "NORWEGIAN" ?????

Wizzcat said an option to disable tab grouping is still "future" and that ruby is still unscheduled, so I'm not even going to bother trying 12 alpha :P

heh

Wizzcat: oh, and total sadface at ruby still being unscheduled :( it's not just IE any more, webkit can too! >(

is this ruby-> stuff ontop of kanji?

not ruby-> scripth stuff

sort of, it's what you use to write the stuff on top of kanji (aka furigana) in html

yea that's what i meant

and no, not the script stuff :)

i remember

maybe for fun and lols i'll download a really crapp early version like 6

see wtf stuff looks liek with it

"Opera 7 series

ork, Bork! "

lol

oh so the javascript engine in 10 is "futark" while in 10.50+ is "carakan"

hmm that might explain some stuff

heh, I remember the bork version XD

aw man I wish i had known of opera before

it's. yea

my first version was 3.62

it was pretty bad. but fast. and fit on a floppy disk.

and I loved the whole tabs in a window idea

giggle

actually, opera headquarters isn't far from wher i live

i go past it on the bus every time to school

I remember it didn't support arbitrary words as colour names, so when people wrote something like <font color="letsseewhatthisis"> and got something like light yellow, I would get black. that meant that loads of things were black on black and I had to turn off styling for most sites to work

i've bee nthinking about pttign a postit on the door or something t othe effect of "hello opera, you amke a fantastic browser, pelase enable "tab grouping on/off" :D"

haha

it's worth a sot

shot*

ok so now it is impossible to remove a musicbrainz tag fro ma file

not cool you guys

using on the latest with both regular and bitmapdiff

try removing the mb ids and save and it doesn't happen

"save tags" is checked

CatCat: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/PICARD-171 ?

still "clear exsisting tags" needs checking

then it works

nope, reverse

was it ever possible to not save mbids when using picard?

this is trying to remove something, clicking "save"looking on the file and it is removed, but on next readd to picard, has this removed stuff

no

only "not tags"

does it work with clear existing tags checked?

yes

then it works as expected

but aperantly brickas problems isn't solved by that

his problem is that no tags get saved

to you what wrote it, ni bert it does, to someone else it is puzzeling that "clear exsisting tags" need to be checked for "removed tags" isn't saved

it's "check this or removing tags no matter if they are fro mthe files before ,or saved earlier by this program" won't be saved

not quite the same, semantically

clear existing to me means "blank completely before writign new tags"

but that's the same

(wich is why i am careful with it as it also blanks out tags i don't want it to, eg genre,comments etc)

luks: no, it's not it really isn't

i na coding point of view i understand that it is

well, the way picard works it's impossible to know which tags do you want to get removed

its what it "does" or soemsuch

the ones i remove using "dlete" :)

it only knows which tags you currently have in the window

delete

double clik it and lots ot tags show up

and you can remove or add more

no, that doesn't work, because you are not editing the file's tags, you are editing the tags from musicbrainz

anything added is kept

you don't necessarily have them in your files

anything removed isn't

wait whaqt

luks_: doesn't picard basically rewrite the entire set of tags?

i'm prettu sure they are in the files or how else would the progrsm know that it has it?

nikki: yes

exactly, it rewrites, where i understand why "clear" first does it so that mbids are removed

CatCat: picard doesn't care what's in your files

what you are editing in the window comes from MB, not your files

but if i remove mbids fro mthe "more stuffwindow" it should remember that

it's not a window it's a dialogue boc

box

it does, and accordingly it doesn't write it to the file

i don't understadn you at all right now luks

so really when we say "delete this tag", we mean "don't write this tag when rewriting them, whether it was in the original tags or not"

yea!

wich to someon who sees this tag i nthe window assumign it's i nthe tags of the file will expect this behaviour when removign that tag, (eve nif that tag isn't i nthe file?)

picard users shouldn't expect that

picard is not a tag editor :)

well exuse me for not knowing something liek that wich seems as if its what it is

it does let you edit tags though :P it just seems unbalanced that you can add or edit tags but it has no idea how to remove one

given behaviour prior and what i have understood up til now

what nikki saying

exactly

I agree that it could work if you don't match your files to MB at all

then it can remember what was in the file and track your deletes

but I don't see how it could work for MB tags