#musicbrainz

I have an album where a couple of songs are labeled as "Song_name (with some_other_artist)", how should those be added as track relationships? using performer, additional and guest would be ok?

«09:26:46 C<CatQuest> drsaunders: this also why I want to basically remove all these little villages in the US name after everywhere else, they clog up the search, makes it difficult to find what you're looking for, and i'm certain that like 80% are never going t obe used anyway» – I'm actually sure that 90+% are at some point relevant. They will have a

school or a bar or *something* where *someone* once did a musical performance.

(Whether that actually ever gets added though? :shrug:)

al right.

but: they should be excluded from initial search, put them all behind a "extensive" or "advanced" or" us villages" or osmesuch

oh hey, having inline search having categories, that'd be a thing, so if I'm adding some cambodian thing, fetch me things in order cambodia, then rest of asia then unknown and *then* the other places would maybe be cool

drsaunders, reosarevok: It is almost the same issue as SEARCH-336, I agree with drsaunders https://chatlogs.metabrainz.org/brainzbot/music... and a new search server is in progress.

SEARCH-336: searching "Universal Music" and 34. entry is correct "Universal Music" https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/SEARCH-336

so if one is adding "this usonian thing" have the search have categories "europe" "asai" "usa"

asia*

I'm generally talking about inline search when adding recordings/people/relationships etc though.

search search is a differnt tomato

hn.. why is there no series-label rels? like "label released series" etc

I would make a ticket just.. it seems so obvius that i thikn i'm making amistake and it's actually there?

There's a ticket

Some people are against it because that's duplicating the label on the linked releases

So we need a proper discussion about it eventually

¬¬

what's the ticket, I'd like to vote (and link these two examples to why not)

any thing that makes something easier to find is worth the duplication imho

I wouldn't go that far, but I'm reasonably in favor of this link

It's STYLE-347

STYLE-347: Series by label relationship https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/STYLE-347

And you might have voted already :p

anyway it isn't. the series could be one made by a different label (think if it was bought by a diff label or something)

or sitius that are like "label a rereleases all releases by band A (and b, c etc) as "series F"

reosarevok: hah, i had

reosarevok: https://www.discogs.com/Thra-Ka-%E1%9E%8A%E1%9E... beeautiful don't you think? (look at images)

>_<

(if they'd just made a decent scan could probably have fogured this out arg)

haha

unknown EVERYTHING

huh you guys were talking about "KEXP"

look what i find here: https://www.last.fm/search?q=Cambodian+Rocks%2C...

(on tracks)

(apparently the version i have is some other version that's not in mb/discogs/whereever with "bonus "dance circle" tracks. greeeat)

aaahh <3<3<3<3 RYM

hasal lthe editions. there are 3 everyone else is shit. now mb is gonna be awesoem too thnak you rym

!m RYM

You're doing good work, RYM!

>_< can i take it back https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/various... ARG wtf why is this onformation nowhere

(atleast those have glorious actual script. better thna discogs shit by far)

:/ why is there no "import from RYM" userscript :/

Hm. Once again I wonder how to best publish an e-mail I've gotten from an artist somewhere so it can be referenced. I could include it "raw" in the edit note, or upload it somewhere and link it.

Hm hm.

Freso: You could just explain the info came from an e-mail without posting its contents.

I've done that when referencing data from books (mention the title, author and page number without copying any of the text)

Oh, is this not for an edit note?

It is for edit notes. And I would like to reference the exact text, so future editors looking at it can see exactly how it was worded.

(Rather than blindly trusting that my interpretation is correct.)

You can post a relevant snippet, as long as it doesn't contain compromising information

drsaunders, no worries. :)

hi, I hope you guys could vote for https://beta.musicbrainz.org/edit/44549210 so I don't have to wait a while week for this fix (only 2 days) thank you!

thou

wait.. woa

thanks you -> thou

o_O

mind: blown

CatQuest, I'm sorry to disappoint you, but that's not what thou means :P

I know, I was making a ref to the thanks whatever - thatever thing

ah

another label related question!!

should i add another "VoxLox Documentary Sound Art" label and credit that for copyright? https://ia601505.us.archive.org/15/items/mbid-c...

Yes, unless they performed another function that we can only credit to Artists (e.g. graphic design)

there is a 'VoxLox' label already, i'm not really sure how holding ones work though

but C+P is credited to "VoxLox Documentary Sound Art"

on this particular release