#musicbrainz

As long as you keep listening mostly to "normal" music and not to weird classical albums :p

reosarevok, to be sure: now I scanned my mp3, changed the release on the left, dragged all the files. After that i can click submit for the acoustid ?

I... guess so? If the release on the right is the right one and the tracks are in the right positions, sure!

reosarevok, yes :)

reosarevok, and the bars are all green

Yep, sounds about right

what does mean the * near (11/11;11*) ?

11 unsaved changes

no, 11 unsaved files :)

I see now :)

I saw that if I upload a cover of 700kb, after saving my mp3s, every file will be 700kb bigger: why saving an hires image into the mp3 ?

Because the thumbnails haven't been made yet :(

(it takes a while)

)

reosarevok, mmmh should be better that picard will do thumbnailing too, to avoid too large images stored into the file ?

I have a news case ! Some files recognized as albumname, and other as albumname 2012 edition). What's the better way to handle this ?

I simply drag the files on the rght to the correct album, and after I submit.

Yeah

that's pretty much it :)

Nobody knows about a tools that resize cover arts saved into mp3 files ?

the question is, do you need the cover art in every mp3 file in the first place?

Mineo, It helps with my android player ... and if the image i 40kb, what does it care ? We have 32Gb storage on our phones ;)

Who wants to lend me a scanner? :-P

Who has Lyricsbot?

Shouldn't the bot owner be listed on the bot profile page? :|

Also, someone feel like leaving an edit note about "feat." and artist credits on http://musicbrainz.org/edit/19975316 ?

The site's owner IIRC

reosarevok: Which site's owner? ruaok?

The lyrics site they add lyrics for

Oh.

hawke_: Also, if you have time, I'd like help with another set of AcoustIDs. :D

Is the last one on http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=2055505 an obi?

tu9

Think so, yes

"tu9"?

(wtf tu9)

:p

For anyone else who's interested - FTL is on sale

$6 from http://www.ftlgame.com/

reosarevok: Looks like SpaceChem

Fairly sure it plays nothing like it

am i supposed to create a new artist for a one time collaboration?

noobie: Yes and no.

noobie: If it can be easily AC'd, no. If it can't, yes.

or just use an artist collab with artist credits

eg. "the Leu Family Iron"

but this one isn't^^

I'll create a new entity

that's less likely to be mistaken

Tykling: https://musicbrainz.org/edit/19989616

Ain't we all.

Freso: would you leave incorrect capitalization on tracklisting? I remember we discussed diacritics...

function1: Depends on the kind. I wouldn't leave ALL CAPITAL LETTERS as-is.

just articles To The, e.g.

Gates To The City

I'd use "guess case" on that.

done

No one wants to leave a comment on http://musicbrainz.org/edit/19975316 ? :(

A 2:!5 AcoustID fingerprint shouldn't be assigned to a 2:31 track, should it?

*2:33

*2:15

( luks hawke_ )

seems you guys don't have much interest in acoustid for anything other than identification of poorly named files, e.g. track01.wav

so who cares? but i try to be a purist

Freso: also, on that edit, would you vote it down? or just cite wiki for proper AC's

oh, already applied

nikki: didnt mean they were. did i phrase that oddly? just thought that acoustid/bad filename matching was the _only_ reason acoustid's are really of interest

it sounded like you think it doesn't matter if the times don't match, when I think times matter, because if the times are different, the match isn't that good

but I have no idea about freso's case, since I don't know the track

i guess i cant comment on the quality of the match

i would vote no, but if there is a match that makes positive id, then it doesnt matter i suppose

Freso: http://musicbrainz.org/artist/a864a5bc-e2d7-4ad...

function1: for what it's worth, if the only problem with that edit is the feats, I wouldn't vote no (re-adding the release would be a lot more work than just fixing the artist credits)

yeah those open edits do just that

oh, but yeah in the future no 'no' vote

okay

adding a related work is difficult when there are already works established with the same name. especially when [traditional].

virtually impossible unless you have one of the other recordings to compare it too

function1: Thank you.

function1: Re: "n't have much interest in acoustid for anything other than identification of poorly named files" - if the 2:15 fingerprint wrongly matches a 2:31 Recording, it should be fixed, or it won't be able to properly identify "poorly named files".

yep

function1: I believe the algorithm have some time different limit inherent to it which does some sort of time/length something. But luks would be the one to know.

I think it has a max of 10s

In which case it shouldn't link 2:15 to a 2:33. :)

Indeed

If I could get someone to run through the list for https://musicbrainz.org/edit/19992028 that'd be great.