#musicbrainz

a mixtape enters as an album?

I guess so. We don't really have a better way

(for now at least)

Ideally we'd be able to separate those, when we can add stuff as "album, whatever" ("album, remix", "album, soundtrack" etc) maybe I can convince people to add "mixtape" or something. We'll see

:)

in hip hop it helps

I know, hip hop and classical are the two things I edit more often :)

both are complicated. classical I don't...

i love her face in this http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/upshot/obama-pictur...

lol at all the comenters complaining of the use of the word "viral" instead of the actual subject of the photo

if a split doesnt have a title it is named after the artists right?

Is there a feature request for switching artist and track values in the release editor?

at least for the track parser I know there is

master reosarevok

?

:p

Yes? :p

any thoughts on this one ?

dankine: http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Titles/Split_r...

(so, yes)

danke

completely identical release name

huh

same barcode, different tracklist?

[20:34] navapIs there a feature request for switching artist and track values in the release editor?

First option is "someone messed up"

I belive there ixsists an userscript

It exists, but it works quite badly

seesm that the release with 12 tracks is a remix of the other release

exists

:/

yeah

CatCat: I used a regex, problem solved :)

@ navap

script for chrome /chromium

noobie: http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=50699 vs. http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=194933

So it seems legit

yes

(including the barcodes)

but idk,personally i think they should be somehow made more distinguishable :(

like (remix) or (remastered)

idk

Disambiguation comment

noobie: feel free to add a disambiguation comm

yeah

that

:p

(just edit the release and add it)

yeah alright...:D

anywany,the barcode on the pics you posted are different than the one @ musicbrainz ?

Looks the same to me

6 00353 95052 8

Mushroom JazzCD121996-10-22USOm RecordsOM-005600353950528

wait

Looks like that 11-track release is the 2-disc version

right

sorry :D

the 11-track release is the original

and the 12 track is a re-release

Reissue of the original that contains all 11 tracks from the first disc (although mixed in a different order) and also contains Midnight Calling (Fly Amanita Remix) by Mark Farina.

Yep

reosarevok: I forget, how do we handle CD-ROM-only second discs?

just 1 track, [data track]?

I don't think we know :)

Hehe

hawke_1: that's how I would add them.

warp: Depending upon what’s on them I could see doing the second as “digital media”

hawke_1: well yes, if the data is a set of music files, I'd be ok with that.

Looks like this one doesn’t do that, though

noobie: I fixed some of the acoustIDs from that release, but some are still questionable. You might want to look at that if you have the release

how do i edit the acoustids at mb?

ah

i see ^^

hm

acousticID vs ampliFIND ??

seems that acoustid is the better choice??

Yes

amplifind is goin to be dead soon..why is picard using it by default ???

It is not supposed to in the next version

k :)

when i do a right click -> details is picard showing the acoustID from the database or the acoustid created from my file?

the latter one i think?

again

mushroom jazz 1-5 is tagged as "mushroom jazz x" but the 6th release is tagged as "mushroom jazz volume 6"

i guess mushroom jazz,volume x would be the correct form?

looooool

what a great example.

great series brah

so, I think 1-5 should be named "mushroom jazz x"

and 6 "mushroom jazz, volume 6"

but that is just like, my.. opinion.. man.

but according to the style guidelines all should be mushroom jazz,volume x ... :)

Should they?

�Release title, Volume 2�

"and are labeled as volumes"

which they are

(see other suggested releases)

hmm

The cover just says the number, right?

I'd go with that in order to avoid the ugly, ugly ", Volume n" but that's just me :p

soo messy the label :o

no it says volume

lol

actually

it is different on every release

heh

i'll just leave it as it is ^^

The release editor really doesn't like it when you click previous :(

Doesn't it?

You mean how it unselects half of your choices?

I've had different things happen when I try and go back to the tracklist page. Sometimes it's complained I haven't set artists (I have), and sometimes it can't load the tracklist at all

Moving forward to the recording page I find that everything's unselected

The latter always happens, yeah

scotland is not in the list for countries @ artist details?^^

or it counts to uk?

it's part of the uk

k

(Never Been to) California

or (Never Been To) California

first one i guess?

first IMO

yeah first one's right acording to the style guidelines

loi what, is amplifind ?

a prorietary service similar to acousticID ?

[21:16] noobieit is different on every release

that reminds me..

of that thing