nikki will continue using this version until she really needs or wants to upgrade
reosarevok
v6lur: oh, changed then
jesus2099
I know your update strategy… you’re really right… I do this for almost everythnig except Opera but I don’t know why… anyway I really should not :)
kovacsur joined the channel
CallerNo6 joined the channel
nikki: do you want to drop an eye on my userjs to upgrade your page ? Or are you ok just like this ?
jesus2099 joined the channel
nikki: sorry to disturb again but could you integrate my small code in your page, please ? (it matches all ISRCs in a text area and quickly/basicly marks the duplicates if any)→because we can’t submit anthenticate with Opera so my userjs ixs useless :/
it’s very small
code
well, “very small”
or well, maybe I can try with FF if you’re not there…
I don't know the guy and I have never developed a mobile app
But if that's a decent tutorial we might want to tweet about it :p
luks
no, it's not a decent tutorial on how to use the MB API :)
reosarevok
Then maybe we should indicate them why it is not so they can use it correctly :P
jesus2099
indecent tutorial
reosarevok
Totally NSFW!
hawke_1 joined the channel
:D
jesus2099
not safe for what ?
reosarevok
No, that would be "NSFW?" not "NSFW!"
:p
jesus2099
ah oh true
jesus2099 had to search wikipedia to understand though :)
Now I know NSFWTF
reosarevok
Oh :)
jesus2099
and NSFOMFG
jesus2099 was threatened by NickServ because of “nick nick”
hawke__
ocharles: So, shouldn’t that “context” just be a matter of showing the entire tracklist when one is changed?
ocharles
that's one option
though that's exactly what we used to do, iirc, and it was too much
I plan now to add 1 track context around each change
hawke__
Ah. Hmm.
Just seems wrong to say “old /tracklist/” and not show the tracklist
Even worse since it doesn’t even show which track # is being removed
ocharles
sure it does
it's track 1
hawke__
Well…kinda, but at least in that one, it just looks like it’s numbering the tracks being edited (as in “this is the first track being changed”). Perhaps clearer when there’s context.
ocharles
well if you want to read it that way... but it's not making up a track name, so I can't see why it would make up a track number
kovacsur
What I find slightly confusing about it is that an edit like this changes track positions for all the remaining tracks, but that's not reflected in the diff
2 -> 1, etc.
ocharles
yes, because if you show that, you end up displaying the entire tracklist again
I opted to just show the chanegs a user made, outside changing track positions
bitmap
jesus2099: I can't find any issue with pending edits, do you have a release where it's broken?
hawke__
ocharles: Fix one thing, break another eh?
What’s wrong with displaying the entire tracklist? Just that it becomes too much info?
reosarevok
hawke__, I'd argue it becomes so huge you can barely see the changes
(we had this discussion a long time ago)
v6lur
hm, url type isn't autodetected when adding youtube links
reosarevok
Yeah
I think I might have broken it
(while making it autodetect URL for youtube *videos*)
ocharles
hawke__: we *used* to have just that
reosarevok
Open a ticket and assign it to me, please :)
ocharles
I imagine there's a good reason why we now don't do that
hawke__
ocharles: I can’t think of one. :-p
ocharles
unvotable edits isn't good enough for you?
because that's why we did this
hawke__
They’re unvotable now…
But, MB needs better diff views in general so it’s just one more problem with them
reosarevok
No
hawke__
certainly not a showstopper
reosarevok
Removals are hard to vote now
While everything was hard to vote before
:p
jesus2099 joined the channel
(of course, if we can find a way for everything, including removals, to be easy to vote, that'll be better)