#musicbrainz

starter cards are usuall $500

my cc only goes to 5000nok since I'm a poor student :|

thats uh 50 000 nok about

Wizzcat: yeah, only $1500 here for the same reason :-P

so.. this is how much you can *borrow*

CatCat: yes.

so you can *borrow* that amount?

aahh

loi $42,000

thats A LOT

CatCat: although, it's noramally not that simple either

it's useful when you're abroad so people don't scam you

yea well im not getting one so i dont have to worry

I know on mine, it's just the amount you get 60 day's interest free on

CatCat: at insane rates usually though :)

if you go over the limit, you get interest charged immediately

i used my visa mastercard to wirthdraw 100 punds

visa mastercard? it can't be both :p

postbanken visa

postbanken? crazy!

post bank?

we used to have one of them

what would be cool: bringing up the edit history if someone tries to change a track or release name to some value it has been set to in the past

MClemo: agreed.

if I don't forget it til evening, I'll file a feature request in the bug tracker

is there a style guide for 2 people colaborating, but there's no 'and' in the title?

e.g. 'Person A / Person B': Title

I do "Person A & Person B" if it's not a named collaboration of some sort

and "Person A, Person B & Person C" for more than two artists

with an &, or 'and'?

well, some people take it very literal how the collaboration is named on the release

see two of my failed edits for that ;-)

that's what I'm adding

http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/FeaturingArtistStyle has something

for the feat. part. You can use that for the collaborations, I guess

that's jazz, isn't it?

yeah

there the artist business is so difficult, I don't touch that ;-)

heh

some jazz dude can help you better probably

sparks: http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2824650460/

the man: http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2824651084/

big ass hummer: http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2824652772/

BURN: http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2823819729/

stainless steel jungle gym: http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2824657700/

heh. these are just the highlights.

the BURN one is worth it. :)

hehe

my art project: http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2824659052/

sunrise: http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2824660686/

dust!: http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2823827107/

sagrada basura: http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2824662976/

real life sierpinksky triangle: http://flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2823831491/

it's too small :-P

too low order you mean?

it was 2 stories tall

yeah, I do

although, you're right, another level and it would have to be massive

for some reason I took 'real life' to mean one made out of people lying on the ground :-P

is there a tendancy to create larger-than-life things?

or smaller than life.

this time there was an EXIT sign that was....

far away and REALLY big.

or close by and REALLY small.

I never did bother to go investiage

you weren't sure which it was, or it was both at the same time?

normally they are 20-30cm tall.

that was closer to 2m.

right :)

someone tell me where my manuscript is

ok, guyise

imoff

to IKEA!

:-( someone destroyed my art: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mayhem/2824661822

fukkers.

does it say "thx douchebags" ?

hah

hadebra ruaok

Hmm. Anyone found out what the hell is Google Chrome doing when it starts to trash your HDD?

uh :-/

If I just open it and leave it there, after about half a minute it starts do something with my HDD. And it's doing it enough to make the whole desktop sluggish.

Wow, that's the first I've heard of that

I've been using Chrome for an hour seriously now and I keep finding small gripes that keep from switching it to my default browser

It probably sends everything to Google to use as they like (regarding the TOS)

Or it's integrating with Google Desktop and tries to reindex everything.

Muz: flash isn't working here in chrome, I haven't given it a proper try yet.

wfm

Also, damn you IRC, I had an idea how to confront this bug and now I've forgotten :|

Muz: Just not having ad blocker is enough to keep it from regular use.

srotta, I don't ever use adblock on Firefox so that bothers me not

It was terrible to see the ugly truth of the Internet again :|

too bad it also filters the current cdbaby design as 'domain squatter'.

pretty fast js engine atm

Seriously, an ad block that jumps into middle of a news article with some animation and other ugliness?

And someone actually thinks that will increase their sales?

but it's not tested against mozilla/webkit nightlies

I doubt that even then the Mozilla nightlies will fare much better than Chrome or the other browsers

noscript++ # who cares about the speed of the js engine when it's turned off anyway

LotR: uh, my gmail account cares

Muz: firefox has a new jit js compiler

that is *insanely* fast

screw webmail.

oh, flash suddently started working. weird google.

LotR: google chrome is aimed at speeding up web _applications_. If you're not using any of those, you won't see any benefit :)

warp: I wouldn't anyway, since it's windows only :)

There is the intention to make it available on OS X and Linux so you silly OS Zealots can pry your heads from your arse and use it in all due time

LotR: and 32 bit

there's lots of really bad 32-bit assumtions in the code

LotR: eventually it'll be open source and available for other platforms.

like doing 32-bit math on pointers :-P

warp: there's an svn repo out

alastairp: oh, nice

someone I know is hacking on the js engine, trying to make it 64-bit clean

Remosi, in facr

fact

Muz: I actually curious if it can eventually make browsers stable on OS X. because the firefox on windows xp at work almost never crashes, and the browsers at home do so daily.

+am somewhere

warp: the multiple process is really nice

warp: nobody will make it as snappy on linux as on windows

alastairp: i suspect it's flash crashing them though, which isn't properly included in the sandboxing right now.

alastairp: doesn't work as well as advertised :)

luks: i do not currently use linux on the desktop anywhere. though hope to get back to it when I get a netbook :)

a flash process managed to make the whole browse inresponsive

luks: that is as advertised though, atleast in that comic book thingy

oh

warp: ah :)

luks: it's not snappy on windows, is it? ;)

it is

but I don't see many advantages of this over something like Opera

except for the fast JS

replacing Firefox is very close to impossible for me