#musicbrainz

muz!

Hahah, that track is horrid

kul

:p

Dusj

heh

Tullemo

dusj?

tullemuz

Hrm... what should the casing be for "Night Riders (Reiter Der Nacht remix Von Boole)" ?

Dusjen

what about it?

Dunno

wtfreak

søtetullemuz

:D:D:D

slaad: "Night Riders (Reiter der Nacht remix von Boole)"

Cheers.

hm

or actually no :D

Oh?

oh CASE-ing

n to casTing

"Night Riders (Reiter der Nacht Remix von Boole)"

as I read it

hmm

Remix another Capitalised word in German?

it's in a context of german words, so english capitalisation doesn't work here. one has to see it as a foreign word

Yeah... I'm totally confused :)

and as it's a noun it has to be capitalised in german

not arguing, just thinking

not arguing either, just explaining :)

:P

thank you for explaining

np :)

Okay, so any complaints for entering it as "Night Riders (Reiter der Nacht Remix von Boole)" ?

nope

How do you remove an Amazon URL from an album?

in the same way you remove any other relationship

edit relationships then delete

Doesn't have any relationships, but it still has an Amazon info and buy link. Or is that normal?

thats an old script generated ASIN, you'll need to add an ASIN to remove that one.

Ah, yay.

Okay... with that particular release it's the European release. Can I use Amazon.de for the link? (Only the US release appears on .com, and I can't find either on .co.uk)

sure

Hrm... didn't appear to like that.

Oh wait.. yes it did. But the info / buy links redirect to .com, where it doesn't exist.

the info / buy links redirect to whatever amazon shop you set in preferences

Ah, okay.

you can go fix it in the setting now :3

to anyone around here: I would appreciate any comment on my Picard interface proposal: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbra...

but you all already know that :)

yarrrr

I like the two apnel idea

panel

but i'm not that displeased with the current picard

it works *remarcably* well

I *really* like the lastes picard

so I can scroll separately and drop things from top to bottom without having to scroll up and down all the time

btw: I meantioned that it woulsnt load cd's once, remember? but that was bogus of my computer so nothing to worry about

hmm... /me dittoes nikki.

yes

that's the *only* thing a bit condfusing with it'

I don't particularly like the idea of *vertical* columns 'cause then there's a limited amount of width for the titles

nikki_: with two horizontal panels you would have to resize them all the time

ideally I'd like some sort of browser internal window, it would make it easier to identify single tracks.. but I realise that's not going nt ohappen for reasons that it would make the interface impossible :)

why?

well, unleas you are running if fullscreen

*unless

I always do

luks: se always runs stuff at fullscreen :)

she*

hehe

nightgroove: WX has a browser widget, soemone insane could make the server serve mini mobile-targetted pages :)

Ok, ok, I know that you all are used to the current Picard. The question is what would new users like and find 'intuitive'.

dsrbecky: A clone of the old tagger!

oohh

nei

the old tagger is :(

FauxFaux: ....and useful

I don't use it anymore

it buggers up æøå and accents

dsrbecky: that's exactly the problem, some people think the old tagger had a way better interface, others say the new one does

and unicode is forgetabout it

I like the iframe browser thing thought. but that's' about the only thing

the old tagger is is *easier for newbies*

Picard 'leaves room to be desired' when dealing with VA cds and recognising badly tagged things, about all that I use it for.

but also its easier to make mistakes i n that 'why should I care i'm getting my tags right'

hmm

all of my files tagged with the old tagger were mistagged

but neither the old tagger nor Picard are helpping me much in tagging 100 directories without messing things up

different releases, etc.

Um, that quoted bit makes no sense at all, never mind.

in picard you have to search youself. in the old tagger, you uhad to do that to, but it was more transaprent since you did the searchin *within the program'

and you still lhave to do a lookup for m the program, and then you can get the tagger icon to work, but I'm used tothat by now

not going to happen

maybe yes

maybe yes o nwhat luks?

the old tagger ui for picard

yes, some thing, a bit simmilar

for all its faults, the ui in the old tagger did *work*

It also didn't make me want to hurt babies.

but having both the curent picard interface and something with other windows is esencial, people lahave gotten used to picard now

it didn't for me, as i said, all my files were mistagger :p

*mistagged

yes I mean, the problems between 'what goes here and wtf and what is this and the inline browser' worked

not that it was correct :)

Ooh, we can just make them use Picard, ahaha.

the old tagger didnt work for me very well, I only have full releases and it was so hard to tell if every track from an album was being tagged from the same release

picard is a goodsent easy with album tagging

I've been doing that recently and its *so* much easiert

this book on percussion is vey helpfull

I have to lend it back to the library to dat though, which is bah, since i've just started reading ti today

mudcrow: So how do you like my interface? If you have only full releases it should be ideal

the new interface is to deal with singular track adding, the old interface works fine for albums

tagging not adding

cant really comment without actually using it. took me ages to get used to picards quirks, so I'm a bit hesitant of any changes

we need to have bot interfaces

exactly for that reason mud said

yes, that's probably what will happen

two interfaces

;)

i like that idea

I think that the current Picard makes album tagging easier, but it is still track centric as the old tagger was. I want real album centric tagger.

what would be coolest, is if you could switch interfaces seamlessly, and the stuff loaded would still be loaded

erh

it is album centric?

It's a shame there are no sane languages for writing GUIs in.

(NOT python, not java..)

wtf is wrong with python?

:p

well we can have two interfaces - the current picard and the new interface in QT - if people find the new one great there will be no need to port the old interface to QT