#musicbrainz

hello everyone

if it's not listed like this on the cover, leave it out i say

hi nechto13

yo nechto

im pretty tired of (feat.)

gurt. this whole "feat." thing is wrong

who isn't?

yllona: i agree 100%

just have to wait untill that whole thing settles

i'm against featuring as well. who's for it? let's fight :)

i dont think applying lead vocal to a track by that artist really does anything

yeah.. feat might be/is wrong but also so many releases list it that way though too

i sang lead vocal on my solo cd

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB... clear

that just seems kind of redundant

well jessi's mods are correct from the standpoint of the actual CD credits artist, and "business of music". MB is th eproblem here

then write to md-users and mb-style

how long has that been around??

yeah, my mail to mb-style is three pages long and growing :P

i would put NGDB - songtitle and just add an AR for Suzy whatshername

by the time this much arguing over a mod takes place, you stop caring about it!

growing is good.

yup

i'm just trying to keep it accurate...aren't we all? geez

i know lord of the flies

if you put Suzy B performed lead vocal i'd vote for it

jessifan: here's a compromise: suzy lead vocal, NGDB background vocal.

wonder if 59,900,000 got lucky cuz they voted that way or was it that 11,800,000 people don't have one ;)- http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB...

add'l notes in the album annotation field

NGDB vocal is implied

why would i do that? it's a duet. it's not just her taking control of the song

the lead singer of the dirt band sings a verse too

and yes, i could put it in like that, but then everyone would be doing that for band/artist duets

GURT has changed the topic to: http://musicbrainz.org/ | http://www.last.fm/group/MusicBrainz.org/ | Add your language to http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ModeratorLanguage | Add yourself http://www.frappr.com/musicbrainz

dual lead vocal then.. one for suzy one for lead singrof NGDB. sorry

i think they already do

the lead singer of the dirt band sings a verse too

aadd the lead singer

and the dirt band for background vocal, since they're also on the track?

gurt, and it;s wrong

and add him doing lead vocal as well

jessifan: yes

tele were you responsible for "My girl friend" vs "mop"?

Sen: didnt see that one... seems to fall under the same as - http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB...

sen: no i was

lol

let's watch someone vote down the new mod too, yllona

someone will dare to

HEY! what up with that gurt

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB... FUCK

Shepard told me to leave it until you recognized it :)

sen that one is much better: http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB...

your both asshats :P

i dont have more than one asshat

?

i can always just pull a "Sen" on google fight and beat any of your guys's names

"we are aaaall individuals.." - "no! I'm not!"

I meant where did these 1,118 people come up with idea to vote on that

vote on what?

oh

wait what?

sen: you can't beat me, cause i beat everyone http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB...

sen: that's cheating, my name is nechto13 ;)

46 results

lo

l

enclose it in quotes

"it"

muz?

What?

did you like teh faint

shup tele

You asked yesterday, and the answer was yes, you even suggested to me what ones to acquire and to avoid Media

yesyes but i was wondering if your opinion changed or you liked the other stuff you heard

sorry to ask, jeez

Sorry, just in an incrediby sour mood, so don't mind me

ok... take that to the MushBrainz channel

that would be the mushroom then?

i recently heard that wikipedia plans to qualify some entries as stable and everything else as live, shouldn't MB follow suit at some point in the future?

:) slow.. but good one

sorry didn't have my daily dose of bad puns yet

budum tssss

you mean and become as slow and inconsistent... I think we're there aren't we :P

nechto13: there were ideas about "closing" albums long before wp did that

i was talking more about artists, then albums, but that probably should be done to albums as well

and we had several ideas about a wiki-like editing system, with different revisions and stuff, on the summit

I think locking should be done on every mod I make... that would simplify things :)

funny

so in the future you may have a system here where everyone at any time can edit textfield data without it going to vote. and then you can lock data and after that every change needs a vote

locking has it advantages.. but many things arent that critical thats its a necessity

tell inhouseuk that :)

hi dupuy

'lo

im in bed now, again, bye

cu

I can understand inhouse's point and agree.. cuz people who especially pay don't want data to say 1 thing today and another tomorrow and yet another next week ..

A simple lock would suffice in many cases... just like when having a disc id by not allowing add & remove track edits.. I would almost like to see that option removed completely.. cuz there really isnt a reason for it now.. Just add it correctly from the get go and call it done

i suggest locking against voted down mods, so that no one can relpicate them, or on album imports, which are already in MB that have the same track listing. something like that, if not the complete locking mechanism

Although looking it only accounts for 202 open edits..

that's much more complicated

which include Data track removals and nat adds

and the definition of duplicate is fuzzy

Shepard: i was just thinking that

nevermind

we kind of have that now.. (album import) fuzzy match.. though a very (bad) generic one

I think our list of 'Data' in various languages should be last track checked when freedb imports are made... a simple coding addition that would alleviate the stupidly redundant Data track removal edits

or my even easier to implement suggestion (but dont help the noobz) allow you remove the darn things before importing them.. Still think that is dumb that we cant edit freedb imports... I dont even bother using them now with the COOL PARSING action

can't edit freedb imports??

clarify: add - remove tracks

whole point of freedb (was) to simplify things and save typing though with all the crap it has usually creates more typing

now if I need something with + or - tracks of a freedb entry I just c&P and then parse it

heres 30+ votes to clear up some data/video track removals - http://musicbrainz.org/mod/search/results.html?...

ah

i think it'd be cool if mb submitted revisions to freedb.. then no one would be importing the same CDs that have been 'fixed' over and over

sure they would.. cuz its whatever one they grab first... and since freedb will keep them all nobody will sort through them

freedb dosen't keep revisions

it overwrites them

as long as they are submitted via something taht supports revisions

True.. which the most commonly used stuff 'doesn't afaik what I mean though.. is if there are 10 versions of and 1 is MB correct there still is the possibility that the other 9 would be used..

unless you revise the other 9 as well..

revise the other 9 :P

but than thats kind of working to fix freedb and not MB

Shepard` is now known as Shepard

it amazes me that people that arent concerned with MB and just want to tag their data still go through trouble of downloading the tagger, setting up an account, importing some freedb junk into mb.. tagging there crap...

dont these nimbots know they can just download a tagging program and type it themselves faster?

night

Night shepster

g'night shep

hmm... 24hrs till d-day for yllone ;)

yllona

ok, the wiki formatting or annotations feature is done now.

CamelCase links will actually go to the wiki now.

tw is now known as ruaok

heh

that was the most rewarding thing I've coded all week.

gtg

teleGUISE: in some parts of the world it's Ilona, Ilone, and just pain helen

pain ;)

i answer to allof them