anomie[m]: last time they came up the suggestion was to create an artist like [person performing as X and Y] just to link them, whose name should be changed to legal name if found out
CatQuest
eeew :C
reosarevok
Do we know absolutely nothing about the legal name? (no first name, no last name, no initials?)
anomie[m]
reosarevok: Well, I could ask him. Seems like a personal question though.
reosarevok
Sure, if it's not public then it's not public
anomie[m]
Can you vote to remove this relationship please? I didn't realize "legal name" was the inverse.
I think I've asked this before, but is the "right" way for this to be encoded is either for a recording to be a partial recording of the whole work or as a complete recording of all of the parts?
In other words, should the things marked Part A, B, and C; Parts 1-7; Parts I-VIII; Parts I-V; and Parts VI-IX all go away and be replaced with either partial recordings of the work as a whole or multiple relations to the parts that make them up?
CallerNo6
yukk. I wouldn't have made overlapping parts that way.
CallerNo6 doesn't know what the "right" answer is, but one way or another that needs to be cleaned up.
Of the two options you give, I think the second is usually more correct.
Parts A, B & C aren't even linked to any recordings.
xplt has quit
xplt joined the channel
toddobryan
OK. That matches my intuition. I'm down to about 1400 places where there are duplicate mappings of releases to works, and I think Shine On You Crazy Diamond is more than half of them.
BabyJesus666_ has quit
peaveyman has quit
Cyna has quit
Priapus joined the channel
xps2 joined the channel
xps2 has quit
peaveyman joined the channel
xplt_ joined the channel
xplt has quit
xplt joined the channel
xplt_ has quit
JoeLlama joined the channel
Dragonzeron joined the channel
Dragonzeron
Hey guys I have been having issues with adding isrcs
It's basically showing a link to a metabrainz blog
