is it me or «External Links» doesn't always keep&submit what I filled in the form ?
am using import from discogs script, and it's been a few times I have to add the discogs source link manually afterwards
reosarevok
Today specifically, or also earlier?
cacabuzztoes
I haven't been submitting infos lately, but so is today
could be related with the update (seen the blog post)
reosarevok
(I ask because the blog entry for the last upda..)
yeah, that
cacabuzztoes
will try to pay better attention to it when submitting next time
johtso joined the channel
okay, so when it sums up the Edit Note (last step before submiting), what is in the «External Link» isn't listed as a commit
reosarevok
Please add a ticket :)
(specify browser and OS too)
cacabuzztoes
i have loads of firefox extension, it's not very helpful for debugging
seems my whole release can't be added coz I played too much with the forms
I removed the discogs relationship, then tried to add it again, then it said "relationship already exists", then went back to «Edit Note», and no commit was listed anymore
dns53 joined the channel
mezod joined the channel
bigshum joined the channel
bigshum
Morning al
Hope this is the right place to ask about Picard - when selecting the option for moving files to a certain folder, Picard is currently dumping all files in the same selected folder, where I would expect it to group them by folder according to matched release. Am I missing a tickbox somewhere? Or is this a job for the renaming conventions as per the scripting language?
Freso
bigshum: Matching to folder is done in the track "filename".
So if you only move but don't rename, they won't get "sorted".
bigshum
Thanks
ok will try a test small amount with renaming activated also
awesome, thanks. I did use Picard a long time ago so seem to have forgotten everything :D
Freso
Depending on how long, it has also changed a bit. :)
KRSCuan: i don’t think parent css selector even exist :)
try { document.querySelector("my + css ~ selector > here").parentNode) } ☜ we can use this maybe :)
KRSCuan
They apparently were in the CSS4 draft at some point, though it is constantly evolving.
Or devolving.
Anyway, such functionality isn't directly supported by any common browser.
JesseW joined the channel
jesus2099
it is not really lacking a lot imo…
it would probably be nice to have but ↗
KRSCuan
You have to write/produce pretty terrible web pages if you need it to style your own site, but it is really needed for userstyles fixing these terrible web pages.
Or in this case, remove a mildly annoying element.
jesus2099
I see :)
btw if you’re using tampermonkey, greasemonkey or opera with or without violent monkey — that is if you are not using chromium’s integrated user js support, you don’t need those injected workarounds any moe, as far as I tested it
chirlu` joined the channel
KRSCuan
The code is from 2011, I only changed two lines.
bigshum has left the channel
chirlu`
jesus2099: I don’t understand what you really want to achieve with MBS-7728.