#musicbrainz

well it says that in the comment so I can see that :)

also it's clearly kana :)

it should be possible to remove the "this article is about x, for the y see z" notice from wikipedia articles

I was thinking of merging them into one, since on the booklets I have they credit パニックチャンネル as producer et al

weird tere's a en. wiki but not a jp.wiki

they were kinda popular outside japan

neat

yea in early '00 visual kei was big in u and europa too

their gothic music is quite nice

even i heard of it (was how came across some music)

like malice mizer - dir en grei. c'le arc.. how you spell.. there's much more

l'arc en ciel

lol grei

grey not grei XD

yes that' was it

This is the first time I've seen EvO4life enter a release that almost follows feat. style: http://musicbrainz.org/release/c818c407-f16b-40...

And then he blows it with missing spaces.

Can Guess Case not correct that?

Only track titles, not credits.

I think.

He never uses guess case anyway.

It’s an easy mistake to make though

Yeah, true.

When I select the autocomplete dropdowns for the field in Fx, it even strips the spaces.

it used to add spaces

around "vs." and "feat."

(as well as around "&" and after ",")

Was that feature removed at some point?

It broke and nobody fixed it IIRC

CatCat: I'm not even sure whether the removal is a "feature" of Fx.

And yeah, if I use "auto" completion for the join phrase in Fx, it will strip whitespace.

are there any official docs on the difference between release and standalone recording?

other than whatever's on the page for standalone recordings, no

standalone recordings are a bit of a sore spot for me and a few other people, since i often want to attach info like release dates, etc. to individual recordings put out by an artist that aren't music releases in the traditional sense

which of course standalone recordings don't have

and standalone recordings naturally lose all their standaloneness if the recording is ever put on a release.

yeah, the classical release mode isn't really applicable to things like free songs for download

Leo_Verto: Well, some (myself included) would treat them as simply 'singles'

[18:20] <KRSCuan> CatCat: I'm not even sure whether the removal is a "feature" of Fx.

not sure what "fx." is in this context

Firefox

wha

t

"ff" is firefox

Fx -> Firefox

Fx is also Firefox.

"Kært barn har mange navne."

fx is like.. effects (ie special effects)

ja jøss da. men kan vi ikke holde oss til en forkortelse i stedet for a finne opp nye i eninga jus kun for å forvirre en stakkar?

what's wrong with just using ff I guess my argument was :)

see? if you don't expand those abbreviations, all heck breaks loose

FF? That's Final Fantasy, not a browser.

;)

friendly fire from false flag fliers

the mozilla people prefer "Fx" or "fx" (http://website-archive.mozilla.org/www.mozilla....)

I don't always mention Firefox, but when I do, I write out the name.

For those who didn't get the reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-4zfsy6rsM

+1 :-)